Abstract

While current computational capability has led to finite element analysis becoming the predominant means of assessing three-dimensional stress concentrations, there are nonetheless some three-dimensional configurations where the desired level of accuracy of stresses is not realized on the finest mesh used. Here, we offer some simple means of improving the accuracy of finite element stresses for such configurations, and doing so with modest increases in computational effort. These improved stresses are obtained by using an adaptation of Richardson extrapolation on original mesh results, and also on mesh results with a reduced mesh refinement factor. Verification of the improvements is undertaken using the convergence checks and error estimates reported earlier. The approach is applied to nine three-dimensional test problems. Finite element analysis of these test problems leads to eleven stresses on the finest meshes used that could benefit from being improved. The extrapolation procedure in conjunction with the reduced refinement factor improved all eleven stresses. Error estimates confirmed these improvements for all eleven.

References

1.
Pilkey
,
W. D.
, and
Pilkey
,
D. F.
,
2008
,
Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors
, 3rd ed.,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
2.
Richardson
,
L. F.
,
1911
, “
The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, With an Application to the Stresses in a Masonary Dam
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
210
(459-470), pp.
307
357
.10.1098/rsta.1911.0009
3.
Richardson
,
L. F.
,
1927
, “
The Deferred Approach to the Limit — Part I: Single Lattice
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
226
, pp.
299
349
.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.1927.0008
4.
De Vahl Davis
,
G.
,
1983
, “
Natural Convection of Air in a Square Cavity: A Bench Mark Numerical Solution
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
3
(
3
), pp.
249
264
.10.1002/fld.1650030305
5.
Roache
,
P. J.
,
1994
, “
Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
116
(
3
), pp.
405
413
.10.1115/1.2910291
6.
Pai
,
S. S.
, and
Riha
,
D. S.
,
2006
, “
Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-70132.10.1115/GT2012-70132
7.
Subramaniyan
,
A. K.
,
Kumar
,
N. C.
, and
Wang
,
L.
,
2012
, “
An Illustration of the Concepts of Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26257.10.1115/GT2014-26257
8.
Beisheim
,
J. R.
,
Sinclair
,
G. B.
, and
Roache
,
P. J.
,
2018
, “
Effective Convergence Checks for Verifying Finite Element Stresses at Three-Dimensional Stress Concentrations
,”
ASME J. Verif. Validation Uncertainty Quantif.
,
3
(
4
), p.
034501
.10.1115/1.4042515
9.
Neuber
,
H.
,
1946
,
Theory of Notch Stresses
,
J. W.
Edwards
, ed.,
Ann Arbor, MI
.
10.
Cook
,
R. D.
,
Malkus
,
D. S.
,
Plesha
,
M. E.
, and
Witt
,
R. J.
,
2002
,
Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis
, 4th ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
11.
Sinclair
,
G. B.
,
Beisheim
,
J. R.
, and
Roache
,
P. J.
,
2016
, “
Effective Convergence Checks for Verifying Finite Element Stresses at Two-Dimensional Stress Concentrations
,”
ASME J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. Quant.
,
1
(
4
), p.
041003
.10.1115/1.4034977
12.
ANSYS
,
2016
, “
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Element Reference Guide
,” Rev. 16.0,
Ansys Inc
.,
Canonsburg, PA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.