It is the aim of this publication to attract the designers attention to the end wall flow interactions of shrouded high pressure turbines. One of the key issues for designing better turbines is the understanding of the flow interactions set up by the presence of labyrinth seals. Those interaction flows are carefully examined in this publication using the control volume analysis and the radial equilibrium of forces acting on streamlines. The consequences on secondary flow development and mixing losses are discussed and quantified. Out of this insight, design recommendations are derived, which attempt to make use of the nature of the labyrinth interaction flow. The open labyrinth cavities are classified in a systematic way. The aim of this approach is to work out the characteristic differences between hub and tip cavities and those having a leakage jet or sucking main flow fluid into the labyrinth. The influence on the main flow is discussed in terms of the incidence flow angle of downstream blade rows and the associated loss production mechanisms. The design strategies presented in this paper follow two paths: (a) Optimization of the mixing losses of the leakage jets at hub and tip is estimated to result in an efficiency increase of up to 0.2%. (b) The nonaxisymmetric shaping of the labyrinth interaction flow path aims at the secondary flow control in downstream blade rows. This approach might contribute in the same magnitude of order as reduction in the mixing losses.

1.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Johnson
,
C. G.
, 1976, “
An Experimental Study of the Tip Leakage Flow Around Shrouded Turbine Blades
,” CEGB Research Report No. CEGB-R/M/N848.
2.
Peters
,
P.
,
Breisig
,
V.
,
Giboni
,
A.
,
Lerner
,
C.
, and
Pfost
,
H.
, 2000, “
The Influence of the Clearance of Shrouded Rotor Blades on the Development of the Flow Field and Losses in the Subsequent Stator
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-478.
3.
Hunter
,
S. D.
, and
Manwaring
,
S. R.
, 2000, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine. 1. Experimental and Numerical Investigation
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-651.
4.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, 2001, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
23
, pp.
334
341
.
5.
Cao
,
C.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Millington
,
P. R.
, and
Hogg
,
S. I.
, 2003, “
Interaction of Rim Seal and Annulus Flows in an Axial Flow Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2003-38368.
6.
Anker
,
J. E.
, and
Mayer
,
J. F.
, 2002, “
Simulation of the Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in an Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30348.
7.
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2003, “
Effects of Labyrinth Seal Variation on Multistage Axial Turbine Flow
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38128.
8.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
,
Sell
,
M.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 2001, “
Flow Interaction From the Exit Cavity of an Axial Turbine Blade Row Labyrinth Seal
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
342
352
.
9.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Rusch
,
D.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2003, “
Unsteady Flow Interactions Within the Inlet Cavity of a Turbine Rotor Tip Labyrinth Seal
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38128.
10.
Sell
,
M.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2001, “
The 2-Stage Axial Turbine Test Facility LISA
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-492.
11.
Treiber
,
M.
,
Kupferschmied
,
P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 1998, “
Analysis of the Error Propagation Arising From Measurements With a Miniature Pneumatic 5-Hole Probe
,”
Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Cascades and Turbomachines
, Limerick, Ireland.
12.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2003, “
Unsteady, 3-Dimensional Flow Measurement Using a Miniature Virtual 4 Sensor Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe (FRAP)
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38128.
13.
Dawes
,
W. N.
, 1998, “
Blade Row Interference Effects in Axial Turbomachinery Stages: Simulation of Unsteady Blade Row Interaction With CFD: Background
,”
VKI Lecture Series
, February 9–12.
14.
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
Ingram
,
G.
,
Jayaraman
,
P.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Rose
,
M. G.
, 2001, “
Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Profiling
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
0957-6509,
215
(
A6
), pp.
721
734
.
15.
Havakechian
,
S.
, and
Greim
,
R.
, 1999, “
Aerodynamic Design of 50 Per Cent Reaction Steam Turbines
,”
Development of Turbomachinery Design
,
J.
Denton
, ed., IMechE,
Professional Engineering Publishing
, London.
16.
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Brennan
,
G.
,
Newman
,
D. A.
, and
Rose
,
M. G.
, 2002. “
Improving Turbine Efficiency Using Non-Axisymmetric End Walls: Validation in the Multi-Row Environment and With Low Aspect Ratio Blading
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002–30337.
You do not currently have access to this content.