1-20 of 41066
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Image
Image
Image
Sample processing and isolation of the effective film thickness (top) and i...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 3 Sample processing and isolation of the effective film thickness (top) and individual components of the axial (middle) and circumferential (bottom) bulk flow momentum equations. The middle and bottom plots y -axis labels are defined in Eq. (9) . More about this image found in Sample processing and isolation of the effective film thickness (top) and i...
Image
Profiles of film thickness, cumulative axial FSS component, and cumulative ...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 4 Profiles of film thickness, cumulative axial FSS component, and cumulative circumferential FSS component (top to bottom) for various AR and constant operating conditions. Note that all profiles in the bottom two plots correspond to the FSS component. The middle and bottom plots y -axis lab... More about this image found in Profiles of film thickness, cumulative axial FSS component, and cumulative ...
Image
Top: sample axial FSS profile depicting the two linear approximations consi...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 5 Top: sample axial FSS profile depicting the two linear approximations considered. The y -axis label is defined in Eq. (9) . Bottom: error in slope between the groove region fit and the applied net FSS contribution. More about this image found in Top: sample axial FSS profile depicting the two linear approximations consi...
Image
Image
Data and surface model fits for the axial (top row) and circumferential (bo...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 7 Data and surface model fits for the axial (top row) and circumferential (bottom row) FSS ratios for the shallow, middle, and deep data sets. Also included are the single groove validation case results (middle plots). The color (shading) scale for the surface model fits is uniform across eac... More about this image found in Data and surface model fits for the axial (top row) and circumferential (bo...
Image
Comparison of the model predicted axial (top) and circumferential (bottom) ...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 8 Comparison of the model predicted axial (top) and circumferential (bottom) FSS ratios to those extracted from individual groove sections of the full seal CFD simulations. Groove number increases with axial location. Included are 95% confidence intervals for new model predictions, displayed ... More about this image found in Comparison of the model predicted axial (top) and circumferential (bottom) ...
Image
Prediction of leakage versus  ξ   g   for the standard bulk flow method com...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 9 Prediction of leakage versus ξ g for the standard bulk flow method compared to the FSS modified bulk flow method and experimentally reported leakage. The vertical red (solid) line denotes the intersection between the standard bulk flow predictions and experimental results. More about this image found in Prediction of leakage versus ξ g for the standard bulk flow method com...
Image
Prediction of the axial profile of circumferential velocity for the standar...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 10 Prediction of the axial profile of circumferential velocity for the standard bulk flow method compared to the FSS modified bulk flow method and full seal CFD results More about this image found in Prediction of the axial profile of circumferential velocity for the standar...
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
FEM results with parameters  R * = 0.824  μ m,  d  0  = 0.1  μ m,  U  = 7.5...
Published Online: September 27, 2023
Fig. 6 FEM results with parameters R * = 0.824 μ m, d 0 = 0.1 μ m, U = 7.5 m/s: ( a ) sectional view of assembly with T distribution when T attains maximum value, ( b ) T distribution on Al 2 O 3 asperity surface at the moment of ( a ), ( c ) T distribution on SiC asperity surface... More about this image found in FEM results with parameters R * = 0.824 μ m, d 0 = 0.1 μ m, U = 7.5...
Image