Failure of a wheel-rail contact is usually by wear or fatigue of either component. Both mechanisms depend on the state of stress, which in turn depends on size and location of the contact patch. In this work, the feasibility of an ultrasonic approach for measuring the contact, real time on a rail, has been evaluated. The approach is based on the physical phenomenon of ultrasonic reflection at an interface. If the wheel and rail surfaces make contact, and are under high stress, they will transmit an ultrasonic pulse. However, if there is no contact, or the contact is under low stress, then the wave is completely or partially reflected. By measuring the proportion of the wave reflected, it is possible to deduce the extent of the contact area and also estimate the pressure distribution. In a previous work (Marshall, Lewis, Dwyer-Joyce, Olofsson, and Bjorklund, 2006, “Experimental Characterisation of Wheel-Rail Contact Patch Evolution,” ASME J. Tribol., 128(3), pp. 493–504), static wheel-rail contacts were scanned using a transducer to build up a two-dimensional (2D) map of the contact. The procedure was time consuming and could in no way be used for measurements online. In this work, a method is presented that could be used at line speeds, and so provide wheel-rail contact measurements in field trials. The scan is achieved by using an array transducer that performs a one dimensional electronic line scan. This, coupled with the speed of travel of the contact patch past the sensor location, enables a 2D map of the contact to be produced. Specimens were cut from wheel and rail sections and loaded together hydraulically in a biaxial frame. An array transducer was mounted beneath the rail specimen. The array transducer consisted of 64 ultrasonic elements that could be pulsed independently, simultaneously, or with controlled phase difference. The signals were reflected back from the contact to effectively produce a line scan. The transducer was physically moved to simulate the translation of the contact patch and so generate a series of 2D reflection profiles. Contacts under a range of normal and lateral loads have been measured and compared with some simple results using a pressure sensitive film. While the map produced by ultrasonic reflection is relatively coarse, the results agree well with measurements from the pressure sensitive film. The work concludes with a discussion of how this array measurement procedure might be implemented at full line speed, and what resolution could potentially be achieved.

1.
Kalker
,
J. J.
, 1982, “
A Fast Algorithm for the Simplified Theory of Rolling Contact
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
0042-3114,
11
, pp.
1
13
.
2.
Bower
,
A. F.
, and
Johnson
,
K. L.
, 1991, “
Plastic Flow and Shakedown of the Rail Surface in Repeated Wheel-Rail Contact
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
144
, pp.
1
18
.
3.
Telliskivi
,
T.
, and
Olofsson
,
U.
, 2001, “
Contact Mechanics Analysis of Measured Wheel-Rail Profiles Using the Finite Element Method
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
215
, pp.
65
72
.
4.
Yan
,
W.
, and
Fischer
,
F. D.
, 2000, “
Applicability of the Hertz Contact Theory to Rail-Wheel Contact Problems
,”
Arch. Appl. Mech.
0939-1533,
70
, pp.
255
268
.
5.
Kapoor
,
A.
,
Franklin
,
F. J.
,
Wong
,
S. K.
, and
Ishida
,
M.
, “
Surface Roughness and Plastic Flow in Rail Wheel Contact
,” 2002,
Wear
0043-1648,
253
, pp.
257
264
.
6.
Marshall
,
M. B.
,
Lewis
,
R.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
,
Olofsson
,
U.
, and
Bjorklund
,
S.
, 2006, “
Experimental Characterisation of Wheel-Rail Contact Patch Evolution
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
128
(
3
), pp.
493
504
.
7.
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, 2003, “
In-Situ Measurement of Contact Area and Pressure Distribution in Machine Elements
,”
Tribol. Lett.
1023-8883,
14
(
1
), pp.
41
52
.
8.
Lewis
,
R.
,
Marshall
,
M. B.
, and
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, 2005, “
Measurement of Interface Pressure in Interference Fits
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
219
(
2
), pp.
127
139
.
9.
Hodgson
,
K.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, 2000, “
Ultrasound as an Experimental Tool for Investigating Engineering Contacts
,”
Proceedings of the Ninth Nordic Symposium on Tribology
, Nordtrib 2000, Vol.
2
, pp.
377
386
.
10.
Marshall
,
M. B.
,
Lewis
,
R.
, and
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, 2006, “
Characterisation of Contact Pressure Distribution in Bolted Joints
,”
Strain
,
42
, pp.
31
43
.
11.
Pau
,
M.
,
Aymerich
,
F.
, and
Ginesu
,
F.
, 2000, “
Ultrasonic Measurement of Nominal Contact Area and Contact Pressure in a Wheel/Rail System
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
214
, pp.
231
243
.
12.
Pau
,
M.
,
Aymerich
,
F.
, and
Ginesu
,
F.
, 2001, “
Measurements of Nominal Contact Area in Metallic Surfaces: A Comparison Between an Ultrasonic Method and a Pressure Sensitive Film
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
249
, pp.
533
535
.
13.
Pau
,
M.
,
Aymerich
,
F.
, and
Ginesu
,
F.
, 2002, “
Distribution of Contact Pressure in Wheel-Rail Contact Area
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
253
, pp.
265
274
.
14.
Holmes
,
C.
,
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, and
Wilcox
,
P.
, 2005, “
Post-Processing of the Full Matrix of Ultrasonic Transmit-Receive Array Data for Non-Destructive Evaluation
,”
NDT & E Int.
0963-8695,
38
, pp.
701
711
.
15.
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, 2008, “
Thin Oil-Film Thickness Distribution Measurement Using Ultrasonic Arrays
,”
NDT & E Int.
0963-8695,
41
, pp.
596
601
.
16.
Chiao
,
R. Y.
, and
Thomas
,
L. J.
, 1994, “
Analytical Evaluation of Sampled Aperture Ultrasonic Imaging Techniques for NDE
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control
0885-3010,
41
, pp.
484
493
.
17.
Kräutkramer
,
J.
, and
Kräutkramer
,
H.
, 1975,
Ultrasonic Testing of Materials
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
18.
Haines
,
N. F.
, 1980, “
The Theory of Sound Transmission and Reflection at Contacting Surfaces
,” CEGB Research Division, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Report No. RD/B/N4744.
19.
Buck
,
O.
,
Thompson
,
R. B.
, and
Rehbein
,
D. K.
, 1984, “
The Interaction of Ultrasound With Contacting Asperities: Applications to Crack Closure and Fatigue Crack Growth
,”
J. Nondestruct. Eval.
0195-9298,
4
, pp.
203
212
.
20.
Kendall
,
K.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
, 1971, “
An Ultrasonic Study of the Area of Contact between Stationary and Sliding Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
0950-1207,
323
, pp.
321
340
.
21.
Krolikowski
,
J.
, and
Szczepek
,
J.
, 1991, “
Prediction of Contact Parameters Using Ultrasonic Method
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
148
, pp.
181
195
.
22.
Nagy
,
P. B.
, 1992, “
Ultrasonic Classification of Imperfect Interfaces
,”
J. Nondestruct. Eval.
0195-9298,
11
, pp.
127
139
.
23.
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Cawley
,
P.
, 1996, “
A Study of the Interaction Between Ultrasound and a Partially Contacting Solid-Solid Interface
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
0950-1207,
452
, pp.
2613
2628
.
24.
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
,
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, and
Quinn
,
A. M.
, 2001, “
The Use of Ultrasound in the Investigation of Rough Surface Interfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
123
, pp.
8
16
.
25.
Baltazar
,
A.
,
Rokhlin
,
S.
, and
Pecorari
,
C.
, 2002, “
On the Relationship Between Ultrasonic and Micromechanical Properties of Contacting Rough Surfaces
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
50
, pp.
1397
1416
.
26.
Tattersall
,
A. G.
, 1973, “
The Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Technique as Applied to Adhesion Testing
,”
J. Phys. D
0022-3727,
6
, pp.
819
832
.
27.
Gonzalez-Valadez
,
M.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Lewis
,
R.
, 2004, “
Ultrasonic Reflection From Mixed Liquid-Solid Contacts and the Determination of Interface Stiffness
,”
Proceedings of the 31st Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology
, Elsevier Tribology Series, Vol.
48
, pp.
313
322
.
You do not currently have access to this content.