1-20 of 24195
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Image
Image
Image
Comparison between experimental points and numerical profiles at the same position: (a) with the influence of a hot wall and (Rawall = 2.52 × 1011 and Rachimney = 1.22 × 1011) and (b) without a hot wall (Rawall = 0, Rachimney = 1.22 × 1011)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 3 Comparison between experimental points and numerical profiles at the same position: ( a ) with the influence of a hot wall and (Ra wall = 2.52 × 10 11 and Ra chimney = 1.22 × 10 11 ) and ( b ) without a hot wall (Ra wall = 0, Ra chimney = 1.22 × 10 11 ) More about this image found in Comparison between experimental points and numerical profiles at the same p...
Image
Numerical results for case 1 (Rachimney = 2.38 × 1012): (a) isometric view of temperature contours, (b) isometric view of streamlines, and (c) isometric view of draught rate (%) contours
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 4 Numerical results for case 1 (Ra chimney = 2.38 × 10 12 ): ( a ) isometric view of temperature contours, ( b ) isometric view of streamlines, and ( c ) isometric view of draught rate (%) contours More about this image found in Numerical results for case 1 (Ra chimney = 2.38 × 10 12 ): ( a ) isometric...
Image
Numerical results for case 4 (Rawall = 1.34 × 1013 and Rachimney = 8.80 × 1011): (a) isometric view of temperature contours, (b) isometric view of streamlines, and (c) isometric view of draught rate (%) contours
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 5 Numerical results for case 4 (Ra wall = 1.34 × 10 13 and Ra chimney = 8.80 × 10 11 ): ( a ) isometric view of temperature contours, ( b ) isometric view of streamlines, and ( c ) isometric view of draught rate (%) contours More about this image found in Numerical results for case 4 (Ra wall = 1.34 × 10 13 and Ra chimney = 8....
Image
Numerical results for case 4 (Rawall = 1.34 × 1013 and Rachimney = 2.38 × 1012): (a) isometric view of temperature contours, (b) isometric view of streamlines, and (c) isometric view of draught rate (%) contours
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 6 Numerical results for case 4 (Ra wall = 1.34 × 10 13 and Ra chimney = 2.38 × 10 12 ): ( a ) isometric view of temperature contours, ( b ) isometric view of streamlines, and ( c ) isometric view of draught rate (%) contours More about this image found in Numerical results for case 4 (Ra wall = 1.34 × 10 13 and Ra chimney = 2....
Image
Image
Image
An optimum inclination angle of the collector at the test location using solar constant 1.361, latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N, and standard meridian of longitude 82.5
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 3 An optimum inclination angle of the collector at the test location using solar constant 1.361, latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N, and standard meridian of longitude 82.5 More about this image found in An optimum inclination angle of the collector at the test location using so...
Image
Variation in the solar radiation during the drying period at horizontal, latitude angle (23.18 deg), and optimum tilt angle (36.53 deg) position on February (location—latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; time—09:00 a.m. to 06:00 p.m.)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 4 Variation in the solar radiation during the drying period at horizontal, latitude angle (23.18 deg), and optimum tilt angle (36.53 deg) position on February (location—latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; time—09:00 a.m. to 06:00 p.m.) More about this image found in Variation in the solar radiation during the drying period at horizontal, la...
Image
Variation in the temperature and solar radiation during the tomato drying (location—latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 5 Variation in the temperature and solar radiation during the tomato drying (location—latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg) More about this image found in Variation in the temperature and solar radiation during the tomato drying (...
Image
Variation in the temperature ambient air, cabinet bottom, inside the cabinet, absorber surface, and humidity during the tomato drying (location—latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 6 Variation in the temperature ambient air, cabinet bottom, inside the cabinet, absorber surface, and humidity during the tomato drying (location—latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.) More about this image found in Variation in the temperature ambient air, cabinet bottom, inside the cabine...
Image
Variation in the moisture removal during drying of tomato (location—latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 7 Variation in the moisture removal during drying of tomato (location—latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.) More about this image found in Variation in the moisture removal during drying of tomato (location—latitud...
Image
Variation in the moisture ratio during drying of tomato (location—latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 8 Variation in the moisture ratio during drying of tomato (location—latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.) More about this image found in Variation in the moisture ratio during drying of tomato (location—latitude ...
Image
Variation in the drying rate during tomato drying (location—latitude (ϕ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.)
Published Online: April 11, 2025
Fig. 9 Variation in the drying rate during tomato drying (location—latitude ( ϕ ) 23.18 E and longitude 79.94 N; optimum tilt angle—36.53 deg; time—09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m.) More about this image found in Variation in the drying rate during tomato drying (location—latitude ( ...