For clean and efficient electric power generation, the combination of solar power towers (SPTs) with ultrasupercritical steam cycle power plants could be the next development step. The methodology of the European concentrated solar thermal roadmap study was used to predict the annual performance and the cost reduction potential of this option applying tubular receivers with various appropriate high temperature heat transfer media (HTM). For the assessment, an analytical model of the heat transfer in a parametric 360 deg cylindrical and tubular central receiver was developed to examine the receiver’s efficiency characteristics. The receiver’s efficiency characteristics, which are based on different irradiation levels relative to the receiver’s design point, are, then, used to interpolate the receiver’s thermal efficiency in an hourly based annual calculation of one typical year that is defined by hourly based real measurements of the direct normal irradiance and the ambient temperature. Applying appropriate cost assumptions from literature, the levelized electricity costs (LEC) were estimated for each considered SPT concept and compared with the reference case, which is a scale-up of the state of the art molten salt concept. The power level of all compared concepts and the reference case is 50MWel. The sensitivity of the specific cost assumptions for the LEC was evaluated for each concept variation. No detailed evaluation was done for the thermal storage but comparable costs were assumed for all cases. The results indicate a significant cost reduction potential of up to 15% LEC reduction in the liquid metal HTM processes. Due to annual performance based parametric studies of the number of receiver panels and storage capacity, the results also indicate the optimal values of these parameters concerning minimal LEC.

1.
Pitz-Paal
,
R.
,
Dersch
,
J.
,
Milow
,
B.
,
Tellez
,
F.
,
Ferriere
,
A.
,
Langnickel
,
U.
,
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
Karni
,
J.
,
Zarza
,
E.
, and
Popel
,
O.
, 2007, “
Development Steps for Parabolic Trough Solar Power Technologies With Maximum Impact on Cost Reduction
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
129
(
4
), pp.
371
377
.
2.
Sargent & Lundy
, 2003, “
Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts
,” Paper No. SL-5641.
3.
Bugge
,
J.
,
Kjaer
,
S.
, and
Blum
,
R.
, 2006, “
High-Efficiency Coal-Fired Power Plants Development and Perspectives
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
31
(
10–11
), pp.
1437
1445
.
5.
Kiera
,
M.
, 1986, “
Description of the Computing Code System HFLCAL
,” Interatom Report No. GAST-IAS-BT-200000-075.
6.
Lata
,
J. M.
,
Rodriguez
,
M.
, and
De Lara
,
M. A.
, 2008, “
High Flux Central Receivers of Molten Salts for the New Generation of Commercial Stand-Alone Solar Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
130
(
2
), p.
021002
.
7.
Reilly
,
H. E.
, and
Kolb
,
G. J.
, 2001, “
An Evaluation of Molten-Salt Power Towers Including Results of the Solar Two Project
,” Paper No. SAND2001-3674, TRN: US200204%%161.
8.
Merker
,
G. P.
, 1987,
Konvektive Waermeuebertragung
,
Springer Verlag
,
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
.
9.
Fazluddin
,
S.
,
Smit
,
K.
, and
Slabber
,
J.
, 2004, “
The Use of Advanced Materials in VHTR’s
,”
Second International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology
.
10.
Zavoico
,
A. B.
, 2001, “
Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document
,” S. N. Laboratories, Paper No. SAND2001-2100, TRN: AH200132%%389, United States Department of Energy.
11.
Kearney
,
D.
,
Herrmann
,
U.
,
Nava
,
P.
,
Kelly
,
B.
,
Mahoney
,
R.
,
Pacheco
,
J.
,
Cable
,
R.
,
Potrovitza
,
N.
,
Blake
,
D.
, and
Price
,
H.
, 2003, “
Assessment of a Molten Salt Heat Transfer Fluid in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
125
(
2
), pp.
170
176
.
12.
Kutateladze
,
S. S.
, 1959, “
Liquid-Metal Heat Transfer Media
,”
The Soviet Journal of Atomic Energy: Supplement
,
Chapman and Hall
,
NY
.
13.
Mannsville Chemical Products Corp.
, 1999, “
Chemical Products Synopsis-Sodium
,” http://www.mannsvillechemical.com/synopsis/report.htmlhttp://www.mannsvillechemical.com/synopsis/report.html
14.
London Metal Exchange
, 2007, “
Tin Price Graph
,” http://www.lme.co.uk/tin_graphs.asphttp://www.lme.co.uk/tin_graphs.asp
15.
Williams
,
D. F.
, 2006, “
Assessment of Candidate Molten Salt Coolants for the NGNP/NHI Heat-Transfer Loop
,”
ORNL
0735-9861,
TM-2006
(
69
), pp.
13
21
.
16.
Ortega
,
J. I.
,
Burgaleta
,
J. I.
, and
Tellez
,
F. M.
, 2008, “
Central Receiver System Solar Power Plant Using Molten Salt as Heat Transfer Fluid
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
130
(
2
), p.
024501
.
17.
Falcone
,
P. K.
, 1986, “
A Handbook for Solar Central Receiver Design
,” Sandia Report No. SAND86-8009, Sandia National Laboratories.
You do not currently have access to this content.