Search Results | ASME Digital Collection

1-18 of 18

Sort by

Sort Order Select

Proceedings Papers

The Story of the Dent-Gouge Fracture Model

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A014, September 28–30, 2020

Paper No: IPC2020-9435

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9435

View Paper

Topics: Chisels, Fracture (Materials), Pressure, Vessels, American Petroleum Institute, Electromagnetic scattering, Fitness-for-service, Safety engineering

Proceedings Papers

Competency Standards for the Pipeline Industry

Michelle Unger, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T01A003, September 24–28, 2018

Paper No: IPC2018-78477

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78477

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Competencies, Governments, Mentoring, Performance, Regulations

Proceedings Papers

Training and Education: The Great Competence Divide...

Michelle Unger, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2016, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T01A016, September 26–30, 2016

Paper No: IPC2016-64500

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2016-64500

View Paper

Topics: Competencies, Education, Engineering teachers, Failure, Mentoring, Performance, Pipelines, Regulations, Students, Training programs

Proceedings Papers

How Many Pipelines in North America Have Failed by Fatigue and Why?

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins

Paper No: IPC2016-64450

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2016-64450

View Paper

Topics: Fatigue, Pipelines, Failure, Failure data, Safety, Transportation systems, Accidents, Corrosion, Damage, Fatigue failure

Proceedings Papers

Warm Pre-Stressing and Leaks in Pipelines

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins, David G. Jones, Julian Barnett

Proc. ASME. OMAE2014, Volume 6B: Pipeline and Riser Technology, V06BT04A010, June 8–13, 2014

Paper No: OMAE2014-24085

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-24085

View Paper

Topics: Leakage, Pipelines, Stress, Fracture toughness, Pipes, Steel, Temperature, Carbon, Cooling, Cycles

Proceedings Papers

Crack-Like Defects in Pipelines: The Relevance of Pipeline-Specific Methods and Standards

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins, Brian Leis

Proc. ASME. IPC2012, Volume 2: Pipeline Integrity Management, 713-726, September 24–28, 2012

Paper No: IPC2012-90459

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90459

View Paper

Topics: Fracture (Materials), Pipelines, Failure, Fracture toughness, Corrosion, Damage, Failure mechanisms, Fracture mechanics, Pipes, American Petroleum Institute

Proceedings Papers

Investigation Into the Failure of a 40” Diameter Crude Oil Pipeline

Mohamed Dafea, Phil Hopkins, Roland Palmer-Jones, Patrick de Bourayne, Lionel Blin

Proc. ASME. IPC2012, Volume 2: Pipeline Integrity Management, 805-826, September 24–28, 2012

Paper No: IPC2012-90597

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90597

View Paper

Topics: Crude oil, Failure, Pipelines, Fatigue testing, Fracture (Materials), Inspection, Pipes, Roofs, Electrical discharge machining, Fatigue

Proceedings Papers

Inspection & Assessment of Damaged Subsea Pipelines: A Case Study

Richard Espiner, David Kaye, Graham Goodfellow, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2008, 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 4, 291-298, September 29–October 3, 2008

Paper No: IPC2008-64480

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2008-64480

View Paper

Topics: Inspection, Underwater pipelines, Pipelines, Maintenance, Pipes, Seabed, Stress, Compressive stress, Damage, Damage assessment

Proceedings Papers

Transporting the Next Generation of CO 2 for Carbon, Capture and Storage: The Impact of Impurities on Supercritical CO 2 Pipelines

Patricia N. Seevam, Julia M. Race, Martin J. Downie, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2008, 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1, 39-51, September 29–October 3, 2008

Paper No: IPC2008-64063

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2008-64063

View Paper

Topics: Carbon capture and storage, Carbon dioxide, Pipelines, Supercritical carbon dioxide

Proceedings Papers

Modelling of Dent and Gouges, and the Effect on the Failure Probability of Pipelines

Patricia Seevam, Chris Lyons, Phil Hopkins, Malcolm Toft

Proc. ASME. IPC2008, 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 2, 103-116, September 29–October 3, 2008

Paper No: IPC2008-64061

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2008-64061

View Paper

Topics: Failure, Modeling, Pipelines, Probability, Chisels, Cracking (Materials), Databases, Electromagnetic scattering, Fracture (Process), Ocean engineering

Proceedings Papers

A Justification for Designing and Operating Pipelines Up to Stresses of 80% SMYS

Martin McLamb, Phil Hopkins, Mark Marley, Maher Nessim

Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 745-757, September 29–October 3, 2002

Paper No: IPC2002-27007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27007

View Paper

Topics: Design, Pipelines, Stress, Pipes, Reliability, Safety, Yield strength

Proceedings Papers

Smart PIG “Fingerprint” Inspections Can Lead to Fitness for Purpose Assessments and Contractual Disputes

Roland Palmer-Jones, Phil Hopkins, Popi Nafis, Gordon Wintle

Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 21-37, September 29–October 3, 2002

Paper No: IPC2002-27119

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27119

View Paper

Topics: Fingerprints, Inspection, Pipelines, Corrosion, Pipes, Metals, Storage, Construction, Failure, Liquefied natural gas

Proceedings Papers

The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 1565-1581, September 29–October 3, 2002

Paper No: IPC2002-27067

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27067

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Corrosion, Safety, Design, Engineers, Failure, Maintenance, Manufacturing, Quality control, Structures

Proceedings Papers

An Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Pre-Strain on the Fracture Toughness of Line Pipe Steel

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins, Andrew Palmer

Proc. ASME. IPC2004, 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, 1635-1652, October 4–8, 2004

Paper No: IPC2004-0085

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2004-0085

View Paper

Topics: Fracture toughness, Pipes, Steel, Fracture (Materials), Damage, Tensile strength, Approximation, Buckling, Constitutive equations, Design

Proceedings Papers

A Review of the Time Dependent Behaviour of Line Pipe Steel

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2004, 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, 1145-1158, October 4–8, 2004

Paper No: IPC2004-0084

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2004-0084

View Paper

Topics: Corrosion, Damage, Deformation, Failure, Fatigue, Hydrostatic testing, Maintenance, Pipelines, Pipes, Plasticity

Proceedings Papers

Smart Pig Defect Tolerances: Quantifying the Benefits of Standard and High Resolution Pigs

Stephen Westwood, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2004, 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, 1181-1194, October 4–8, 2004

Paper No: IPC2004-0514

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2004-0514

View Paper

Topics: Resolution (Optics), Signals, Corrosion, Failure, Inspection, Metals, Pipelines, Probability

Proceedings Papers

A New Approach to Risk Based Pipeline Integrity Management

Roland Palmer-Jones, Susannah Turner, Phil Hopkins

Proc. ASME. IPC2006, Volume 2: Integrity Management; Poster Session; Student Paper Competition, 811-823, September 25–29, 2006

Paper No: IPC2006-10535

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2006-10535

View Paper

Topics: Inspection, Pipeline integrity management, Pipelines, Risk, Risk assessment, Modeling, Corrosion, Damage, Event history analysis, Failure

Proceedings Papers

Quantifying the Probability of Failure During the Pre-Commissioning Hydrotest

Andrew Cosham, Phil Hopkins, Jan Spiekhout

Proc. ASME. IPC2006, Volume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and B, 1043-1056, September 25–29, 2006

Paper No: IPC2006-10335

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2006-10335

View Paper

Topics: Failure, Probability, Pipes, Pipelines, Pressure, Reliability, Design, Fittings, Flanges, Fracture (Materials)

Journal citation

NARROW

The Story of the Dent-Gouge Fracture Model

Competency Standards for the Pipeline Industry

Training and Education: The Great Competence Divide...

How Many Pipelines in North America Have Failed by Fatigue and Why?

Warm Pre-Stressing and Leaks in Pipelines

Crack-Like Defects in Pipelines: The Relevance of Pipeline-Specific Methods and Standards

Investigation Into the Failure of a 40” Diameter Crude Oil Pipeline

Inspection & Assessment of Damaged Subsea Pipelines: A Case Study

Transporting the Next Generation of CO 2 for Carbon, Capture and Storage: The Impact of Impurities on Supercritical CO 2 Pipelines

Modelling of Dent and Gouges, and the Effect on the Failure Probability of Pipelines

A Justification for Designing and Operating Pipelines Up to Stresses of 80% SMYS

Smart PIG “Fingerprint” Inspections Can Lead to Fitness for Purpose Assessments and Contractual Disputes

The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual

An Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Pre-Strain on the Fracture Toughness of Line Pipe Steel

A Review of the Time Dependent Behaviour of Line Pipe Steel

Smart Pig Defect Tolerances: Quantifying the Benefits of Standard and High Resolution Pigs

A New Approach to Risk Based Pipeline Integrity Management

Quantifying the Probability of Failure During the Pre-Commissioning Hydrotest

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only