The behavior of crack growth of polymeric materials is affected by several operating conditions such as crosshead speed, specimen thickness, load line, and specimen configurations, which reverse the behavior of crack from stable to unstable crack growth behavior. The main objective of the present paper is the determination of plane strain fracture toughness (KIC) for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) used in piping water transmission systems. The dimensions of the PVC pipe are outside diameter, Do = 315 mm, standard dimensions ratio, SDR = 13.23, ratio between outside to inside radii Ro/Ri = 1.179, and pipe thickness, t = 24 mm. Curved specimens are prepared from a pipe by cutting 12 mm thickness ring segments. The curved specimens are divided into two specimen configurations, namely, curved three-point bend (CTPB) and C-shaped tension (CST) specimens. All specimens are provided artificially with a precrack. CTPB specimen is further cut into five 72 deg sectors with each being centrally notched to a depth approximately a = 0.479 of the wall thickness. CST specimen configuration is characterized by the eccentricity X = 0, and 0.5 W, of the loading holes from the bore surface. The linear elastic fracture mechanics theory (LEFM) is used to predict the plane strain fracture. The tests are carried out at room temperature, Ta equal 20 °C, and different crosshead speeds of (10–500 mm/min). The numerical analysis carried out within the frame of the present work is done using the finite element program Cosmos 2.6. Finite element method (FEM) is used to compute the stress intensity factor KQ surrounding the crack tip. The computed stress intensity factor can then be compared with that obtained by theoretical equation. The experimental fracture test results reveal that the crosshead speed has been proven to affect the mode of failure and mode of fracture. At lower crosshead speeds, the mode of failure is ductile, while at higher crosshead speeds, it is brittle. The specimen configuration also affects the fracture toughness. CST specimens show higher fracture toughness in the case of pin loading location X = 0.5W than X = 0 by about (12%). The transitional crosshead speed is affected by specimen geometry. CST specimens (CST) at X = 0 and 0.5W have higher transitional crosshead speed compared with the CTPB specimen configuration.

References

1.
Mandell
,
J. F.
,
Roberts
,
D. R.
, and
McGarry
,
F. J.
,
1983
, “
Plane Strain Fracture Toughness of Polyethylene Pipe Materials
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
,
23
(
7
), pp.
402
409
.
2.
Crawford
,
R. J.
,
1987
,
Plastics Engineering
, 2nd ed.,
Pergamon Press
,
Oxford
.
3.
Takaki
,
A.
, and
Yasui
,
H.
,
1997
, “
Fracture and Impact Strength of Poly (Vinyl Chloride)/Methyl Methacrylate/Butadiene/Styrene Polymer Blends
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
,
37
(
1
), pp.
105
119
.
4.
Che
,
M.
,
Grellmann
,
W.
, and
Seidler
,
S.
,
1997
, “
Crack Resistance Behavior of Polyvinyl Chloride
,”
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
,
64
(
6
), pp.
1079
1090
.
5.
Chiesa
,
M.
,
Nyhus
,
B.
,
Skallerud
,
B.
, and
Thaulow
,
C.
,
2001
, “
Efficient Fracture Assessment of Pipelines: A Constraint-Corrected SENT Specimen Approach
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
68
(
5
), pp.
527
547
.
6.
Gross
,
B.
, and
Srawley
,
J. E.
,
1983
, “
Analysis of Internally Radially Cracked Ring Segment Subject to Three-Point Radial Loading
,”
J. Test. Eval.
,
11
(
6
), pp.
357
359
.
7.
Jones
,
A. T.
,
1974
, “
Fracture Toughness Testing With Section of Cylinders
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
653
662
.
8.
Tracy
,
P. G.
,
1975
, “
Analysis of a Radial Crack in a Circular Ring Segment
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
253
260
.
9.
Darwish
,
A. E. S. Y.
,
Mandell
,
J. F.
, and
McGarry
,
F. J.
,
1981
, “
Applicability of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics to Rigid PVC Pipe Materials
,”
J. Vinyl Tech.
,
3
(4), pp.
246
250
.
10.
Darwish
,
A. E. S. Y.
,
Mandell
,
J. F.
, and
McGarry
,
F. J.
,
1981
, “
Fracture Analysis of PVC Pipe Materials
,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT TAP Report No. R81-7.
11.
Underwood
,
J. H.
, and
Kendall
,
D. P.
,
1977
, “
Fracture Toughness Testing Using the C-Shaped Specimen
,”
Developments in Fracture Mechanics Test Method Standardization
,
W. F.
Brown
, Jr
., and
J. G.
Kaufman
, eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
, Philadelphia, PA, Special Technical Publication STP 632, pp.
25
38
.
12.
Underwood
,
J. H.
,
Scanlon
,
R. D.
, and
Kendall
,
D. P.
,
1974
, “
K-Calibration for C-Shaped Specimen of Various Geometries
,”
Fracture Analysis
,
American Society for Testing and Materials
, Philadelphia, PA, Special Technical Publication 560, pp.
81
91
.
13.
Frederick
,
J. M.
,
John
,
F. M.
, and
Lidia
,
H. L.
,
1985
, “
Brittle Fracture in PVC Pipe Material
,”
J. Polym. Sci. Symp.
,
72
(1), pp.
83
110
.
14.
ASTM, 2012, “
Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIc of Metallic Materials
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 03.01, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Standard No. E399-12e3.
15.
Lee
,
G. S.
, and
Epstein
,
M. M.
,
1982
, “
Fracture Surface Features of Polyethylene Pipe Samples
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
,
22
(
9
), pp.
549
555
.
16.
Anderson
,
T. L.
,
1995
,
Fracture Mechanics: Fundamental and Applications
,
CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL.
17.
EL-Bagory
,
T. M.
, and
Younan
,
M. A.
,
2015
, “
Crack Growth Behavior of Pipes Made From Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe Material
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2015-45657.
18.
Jingshen
,
W. U.
, and
Yin
,
W. M.
,
1996
, “
The Essential Fracture Work Concept for Toughness Measurement of Ductile Polymer
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
,
36
(
18
), pp.
2275
2228
.
19.
ASTM, 2007, “
Standard Test Methods for Plane–Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 8.03, Plastics–General Test Method, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Standard D5045-99(2007)e1.
20.
Kaufman
,
J. G.
,
1977
, “
Experience in Plane–Strain Fracture Toughness Testing Per ASTM Method E-399
,”
Development in Fracture Mechanics Test Methods Standardization
,
W. F.
Brown
, Jr
., and
J. G.
Kaufman
, eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
, Philadelphia, PA, Special Technical Publication 632, pp.
3
24
.
21.
ASTM, 2007, “
Standard Test Methods for Plane–Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 8.03, Plastics–General Test Method, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Standard D5045-99(2007)e1.
22.
Benzley
,
S. E.
,
1974
, “
Representation of Singularities With Isoparametric Finite Elements
,”
Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.
,
8
(3), pp.
537
545
.
23.
Owen
,
D. R. J.
, and
Fawkes
,
A. J.
,
1983
,
Engineering Fracture Mechanics: Numerical Methods and Applications
,
Pineridge Press
,
Swansea, UK
.
24.
Barsoum
,
R. S.
,
1976
, “
On the Use of Isoparametric Finite Elements in Linear Fracture Mechanics
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods, Eng.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
25
37
.
25.
Hensheel
,
R. D.
, and
Show
,
K. G.
,
1975
, “
Crack Tip Elements are Unnecessary
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
495
509
.
26.
Gallagher
,
R. H.
,
1971
, “
Survey and Evaluation of the Finite Element Method in Linear Fracture Mechanics Analysis
,” First International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology Conference (
SMiRT 1
), Berlin, Germany, Sept. 20–24, Paper No. L6/9, pp.
637
653
.
27.
Hellen
,
T. K.
,
1975
, “
On the Method of Virtual Crack Extensions
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
187
208
.
28.
Parkes
,
D. M.
,
1974
, “
A Stiffness Derivative Finite Element Technique for Determination of Elastic, Crack Tip Stress Intensity Factors
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
487
502
.
29.
Caddell
,
R. M.
,
1980
,
Deformation and Fracture of Solids
,
Prentice-Hall
, Upper Saddle River,
NJ
.
30.
EL-Bagory
,
T. M.
,
El-Fadaly
,
M. S.
,
Younan
,
M. A.
, and
Abdel-Latif
,
L. A.
,
2004
, “
Influence of Crack Orientation and Crosshead Speed on the Fracture Toughness of PVC Pipe Materials
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
126
(
4
), pp.
489
496
.
31.
Garwood
,
S. J.
,
1979
, “
Effect of Specimen Geometry on Crack Growth Resistance
,”
Fracture Mechanics
,
C. W.
Smith
, ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
, Philadelphia, PA, Special Technical Publication 677, pp.
511
532
.
32.
Gradin
,
P. A.
, and
Arve
,
E.
,
1984
, “
Crack Growth in High-Density Polyethylene Pipes
,”
J. Test. Eval.
,
12
(
6
), pp.
371
374
.
33.
EL-Zoghby
,
A. A.
,
Younan
,
M. Y. A.
, and
Mohamed
,
A. F. T.
,
1989
, “
A Thick Walled Cylindrical Fracture Toughness Specimen
,”
Current Advances in Mechanical Design and Production IV
, Proceedings of the 4th Cairo University MDP Conference, Cairo, Egypt, Dec. 27–29, 1988,
Y. H.
Kabil
and
M. E.
Said
, eds.,
Pergamon
, Oxford, UK.
34.
Shannon
,
R. W. E.
, and
Wells
,
A. A.
,
1974
, “
Brittle Crack Propagation in Gas Filled Pipelines—A Model Study Using Thin Walled Unplasticised PVC Pipe
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
471
486
.
35.
Kapp
,
J. A.
, and
Eisentadt
,
R.
,
1979
, “
Crack Growth in Externally Flawed, Autofretaged Thick-Walled Cylinders and Rings
,”
Fracture Mechanics
,
C. W.
Smith
, ed.,
American Society of Testing and Materials
, Philadelphia, PA, Special Technical Publication 677, pp.
746
756
.
36.
Francois
,
D.
, and
Pineau
,
A.
,
2002
,
From Charpy to Present Impact Testing
,
Elsevier Science Ltd. and ESIS
, Oxford, UK.
You do not currently have access to this content.