The procedures described in this paper for determining a limit load is based on Mura’s extended variational formulation. Used in conjunction with linear elastic finite element analyses, the approach provides a robust method to estimate limit loads of mechanical components and structures. The secant modulus of the various elements in a finite element discretization scheme is prescribed in order to simulate the distributed effect of the plastic flow parameter, μ0. The upper and lower-bound multipliers m0 and m obtained using this formulation converge to near exact values. By using the notion of “leap-frogging” to limit state, an improved lower-bound multiplier, mα, can be obtained. The condition for which mα is a reasonable lower bound is discussed in this paper. The method is applied to component configurations such as cylinder, torispherical head, indeterminate beam, and a cracked specimen.

1.
Jones, G. L., and Dhalla, A. K., 1981, “Classification of Clamp Induced Stresses in Thin Walled Pipe,” ASME PVP-Vol. 81, pp. 17–23.
2.
Marriott, D. L., 1988, “Evaluation of Deformation or Load Control of Stresses under Inelastic Conditions using Elastic Finite Element Stress Analysis,” ASME PVP-Vol. 136, pp. 3–9.
3.
Seshadri, R., and Fernando, C. P. D., 1991, “Limit Loads of Mechanical Components and Structures Based on Linear Elastic Solutions Using the GLOSS R-Node Method,” ASME PVP-Vol. 210-2, pp. 125–134.
4.
Mackenzie
,
D.
, and
Boyle
,
J. T.
,
1993
, “
A Method of Estimating Limit Loads by Iterative Elastic Analysis I: Simple Examples
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
53
, pp.
77
95
.
5.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Mangalaramanan
,
S. P.
,
1997
, “
Lower Bound Limit Loads Using Variational Concepts: The -method
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
71
, pp.
93
106
.
6.
Mura
,
T.
,
Rimawi
,
W. H.
, and
Lee
,
S. L.
,
1965
, “
Extended Theorems of Limit Analysis
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
,
23
, pp.
171
179
.
7.
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
,
Fuschi
,
P.
, and
Engelhardt
,
M.
,
2000
, “
Limit Analysis for a General Class of Yield Conditions
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
,
19
, pp.
401
421
.
8.
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
, and
Engelhardt
,
M.
,
2000
, “
Shakedown Limits for a General Yield Condition
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
,
19
,
423
445
.
9.
Ponter, A. R. S., and Chen, H., 2001, “A Programming Method for Limit Load and Shakedown Analysis of Structures,” ASME PVP-Vol. 430, pp. 155–160.
10.
Reinhardt, W. D., and Seshadri, R., 2002, “Limit Load Bounds for the Multiplier,” Report No. 01; Mechanics, Structures and Materials Group, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.
11.
ANSYS, 1998, Educational Version 5.5, SAS IP, Inc.
You do not currently have access to this content.