Abstract

Within the European SESAME project, extensive experimental work was performed and complemented by the development, application, and validation activities of thermal-hydraulic simulation tools for different scales. The TALL-3D experimental facility, operated by KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, is designed for thermal-hydraulic experiments with lead-bismuth eutectic (LBE) coolant at natural and forced circulation conditions. The heat generated in the primary TALL-3D circuit is transferred via a double-tube counter-flow heat exchanger (HX) to the secondary side, which is cooled by glycerol oil. Validation calculations with the coupled simulation code ATHLET-ANSYS CFX within the European THINS project showed that one of the major challenges for this one-dimensional–three-dimensional (1D–3D) simulation of the experimental facility lies in the calculation of the HX with ATHLET. This is due to the fact that glycerol oil properties are not yet available for ATHLET. In order to better understand the flow and heat transfer phenomena inside the HX, 3D stand-alone calculations with ANSYS CFX were carried out for the SESAME experiment TG03.S301.03. The data generated in this experimental run is challenging for validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes, because the test combines heat transfer between buoyancy-driven LBE flow in the primary circuit and a turbulent oil flow in the secondary TALL-3D side. Moreover, the validation gets even more difficult for the CFD approach due to the fact that both coolants are nonunity Prandtl fluids, and this requires a careful modeling of the turbulent heat flux. In this paper, the TALL-3D HX behavior during test TG03.S301.03 is analyzed, and the results of the ANSYS CFX calculations are compared with measurements.

References

1.
Gabril, R.
,
2018
, “GIF R&D Infrastructures Task Force, Challenges and Opportunities,”
Fourth GIF Symposium
, Paris, France, Oct. 16–17.
2.
Grishchenko
,
D.
,
Jeltsov
,
M.
,
Kööp
,
K.
,
Karbojian
,
A.
,
Villanueva
,
W.
, and
Kudinov
,
P.
,
2015
, “
The TALL-3D Facility Design and Commissioning Tests for Validation of Coupled STH and CFD Codes
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
290
, pp.
144
153
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.11.045
3.
Papukchiev
,
A.
,
Geffray
,
C.
,
Jeltsov
,
M.
,
Kööp
,
K.
,
Grishchenko
,
D.
, and
Kudinov
,
P.
,
2015
, “
Multiscale Analysis of Forced and Natural Convection Including Heat Transfer Phenomena in the TALL-3D Experimental Facility
,”
16th Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics Conference (NURETH-16), Chicago, IL, Aug. 30 to Sept. 4,
p.
14
.
4.
Geffray
,
C.
,
Macián-Juan
,
R.
, and
Papukchiev
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Development of Multiscale Thermal-Hydraulic Model of the TALL-3D Facility and Validation With Experimental Data
,”
International Congress on the Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2015), Nice, France, May 3–6, p.
10
.
5.
Dow Chemical, 1996, “Dowtherm RP Heat Transfer Fluid,” Product Technical Data, Midland, MI,
accessed Oct. 24, 2019,
https://www.dow.com/en-us/pdp.dowtherm-rp-heat-transfer-fluid.51244z.html
6.
ANSYS
,
2017
, “
ANSYS CFX 18.2 User's Manuals
,”
ANSYS
, Cannonsburg, PA.
7.
Papukchiev
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Influence of Solid Structure and Conjugate Heat Transfer Modelling on the Liquid Temperature Distribution Inside a Cylindrical Test Section
,”
International Congress on the Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2016)
, San Francisco, CA, Apr. 17–21, Paper No. 16384.
8.
OECD/NEA
,
2007
, “
Best Practice Guidelines for the Use of CFD in Nuclear Reactor Safety Applications
,” OECD/NEA, Paris, France, Report No. NEA/CSNI/R(2007)5.
9.
OECD/NEA
,
2007
, “
Handbook on Lead-Bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-Hydraulics and Technologies
,” OECD/NEA, Paris, France, Report No. NEA No. 6195.
10.
OECD/NEA
,
2015
, “
Handbook on Lead-Bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-Hydraulics and Technologies
,” OECD/NEA, Paris, France, Report No. NEA No. 7268.
11.
Menter
,
F.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
269
289
.10.2514/3.12149
12.
Papukchiev
,
A.
,
Grishchenko
,
D.
, and
Kudinov
,
P.
,
2016
, “
CFD Analysis of a Liquid Metal/Glycerol Oil Double Tube Heat Exchanger and Comparison With Measured Data
,”
Proceedings of ANSYS Conference 2015 and 34, CADFEM Users' Meeting
, Nuremberg, Germany, Oct. 5–7, p.
14
.
13.
Groetzbach
,
G.
,
2003
, “
Turbulence Modelling Issues in ADS Thermal and Hydraulic Analyses
,” IAEA Technical Meeting on Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Heavy Liquid Metal Thermal Hydraulics
, Karlsruhe, Germany, Oct. 28–31, pp.
9
32
.
14.
Rodi
,
W.
,
1993
, “
Turbulence Models and Their Application in Hydraulics—A State of the Art Review
,”
International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR)
, 3rd ed.,
Balkema Rotterdam
,
Delft, The Netherlands
, p.
13
.
15.
Jischa
,
M.
, and
Rieke
,
H.
,
1979
, “
About the Prediction of Turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt Numbers From Modeled Transport Equations
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
22
(
11
), pp.
1547
1555
.10.1016/0017-9310(79)90134-0
16.
Kays
,
W.
,
1994
, “
Turbulent Prandtl Number—Where Are We?
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
116
, pp.
284
295
.10.1115/1.2911398
17.
Groetzbach
,
G.
,
2007
, “
Anisotropy and Buoyancy in Nuclear Turbulent Heat Transfer—Critical Assessment and Needs for Modelling
,”
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH Technik und Umwelt
, Karlsruhe, Germany, Report No. FZKA 7363.
18.
Papukchiev
,
A.
,
Roelofs
,
F.
,
Shams
,
A.
,
Lecrivain
,
G.
, and
Ambrosini
,
W.
,
2015
, “
Development and Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics Approaches Within the European Project THINS for the Simulation of Next Generation Nuclear Power Systems
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
290
, pp.
13
26.
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.003
You do not currently have access to this content.