In view of the well-known disparity between predictions from temper rolling models and measured values from rolling mills, there is a need to obtain a better understanding of the effect of roll asperities on the yielding characteristics of the rolled strip. This paper models a roll with asperities as a rigid body with a regular serrated surface and the rolling process as an indentation, and uses the plane strain model and slip-line theory to determine the critical pressure that is required to yield the strip throughout the thickness beneath the tips of the asperities. The strip is also under lateral tension at both ends. The emphasis of the paper is the effect of the lateral tension and the thickness of the strip on the critical pressure. For the case when the indenting surface has sharp teeth, the critical pressure can be found in close form. For the case when the indenting surface has blunt teeth, a robust approximate scheme for estimation of the critical values that does not require extensive computation is given and this scheme can be used in an on-line control process. It is found that when the tooth angle is smaller than a critical angle, the sharper the tooth, the lower the average critical pressure needed to make the strip yield. When the tooth angle is larger than the critical angle, then the blunter the tooth, the lower the pressure that is needed. The effect of the asperities is to reduce the critical pressure and it is found that this effect is more pronounced for thin strips than for thick strips. The lateral tension reduces the critical pressure further. These findings give some implications for the rolling of metal sheets.

1.
Domanti, S. A., Edwards, W. J., and Thomas, P. J., 1994, “A Model for Foil and Thin Strip Rolling,” Association of Iron and Steel Engineers Annual Convention, Cleveland.
2.
Bay
,
N.
, and
Wanheim
,
T.
,
1976
, “
Real Area of Contact and Friction Stress at High Pressure Sliding Contact
,”
Wear
,
38
, pp.
201
209
.
3.
Larsson
,
J.
,
Biwa
,
S.
, and
Storakers
,
B.
,
1999
, “
Inelastic Flattening of Rough Surfaces
,”
Mech. Mater.
,
31
, pp.
29
41
.
4.
Pawelski, O., Rasp, W., and Loffler, L., 1987, “A Plastomechanical Model of the Transfer of Surface Roughness From Tool to Workpiece,” in Advanced Technology of Plasticity, Proc. 2nd. International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5.
Shi
,
J.
,
McElwain
,
D. L. S.
, and
Domanti
,
S. A.
,
2002
, “
Some Plastic Deformation Modes for Indentation of Half Space by a Rigid Body With Serrated Surface as a Model of Roughness Transfer in Metal Forming
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
124
, pp.
146
151
.
6.
Avitzur, B., 1987, “A Model for the Characterization of Friction Resistance to Sliding as a Function of Load, Speed and Viscosity, and Geometry,” in Advanced Technology of Plasticity, Proc. 2nd. International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
7.
Black
,
A. J.
,
Kopalinsky
,
E. M.
, and
Oxley
,
P. L. B.
,
1992
, “
An Investigation of the Interaction of Model Asperities of Similar Hardness
,”
Wear
,
153
, pp.
245
261
.
8.
Sutcliffe
,
M. P. F.
,
1988
, “
Surface Asperity Deformation in Metal Forming Processes
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
30
, pp.
847
868
.
9.
Sutcliffe
,
M. P. F.
,
1999
, “
Flattening of Random Rough Surfaces in Metal Forming Processes
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, pp.
433
440
.
10.
Domanti, S. A., 1996, “Investigation Into the Modelling of Dry Temper Rolling,” Industrial Automation Services Internal Report.
11.
Hill
,
R.
,
1953
, “
On the Mechanics of Cutting Metal Strips With Knife-Edged Tools
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
1
, pp.
264
270
.
12.
Hill
,
R.
,
Lee
,
E. H.
, and
Tupper
,
S. J.
,
1947
, “
The Theory of Wedge Indentation of Ductile Materials
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
188
, pp.
273
290
.
13.
Hill
,
R.
,
1950
, “
A Theoretical Investigation of the Effect of Specimen Size in the Measurement of Hardness
,”
Philos. Mag.
,
41
, pp.
745
753
.
14.
Bishop
,
J. F. W.
,
1953
, “
On the Complete Solution to Problems of Deformation of a Plastic-Rigid Material
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
2
, pp.
43
53
.
15.
Shindo
,
A.
,
1972
, “
A Theoretical Analysis of Indentation Hardness, Part I: Slip-Line Fields for Wedge Indentation
,”
Memoirs Faculty of Engineerings, Kobe University
,
18
, pp.
65
88
.
16.
Dodd
,
B.
, and
Osakada
,
K.
,
1974
, “
A Note on the Types of Slip-Line Field for Wedge Indentation Determined by Computer
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
16
, pp.
931
938
.
17.
Ewing
,
D. J. F.
,
1967
, “
A Series-Method for Constructing Plastic Slipline Fields
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
15
, pp.
105
114
.
18.
Johnson, W., Sowerby, R., and Venter, R. D., 1982, Plane Strain Slip Line Fields for Metal Deformation Processes, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
19.
Mazur, V. L., Kolensnichenko, B. P., and Pargamonov, E. A., 1975, “Power and Force Parameters of the Skin-Passing Process,” Steel in USSR, pp. 502–506.
You do not currently have access to this content.