A performance index, is developed for assessing the flexibility of candidate engineering designs and manufacturing processes at various stages during product development. The index is a ratio of the range of the feasible space to the range of the specification or measured process variation. The process flexibility index complements the process capability index, to provide a simple and quantitative basis for practicing the principles of axiomatic design. This quantitative measure can be used to support rational product development and manufacturing investment decisions, and clearly illustrates important concepts regarding controllability across conflicting specifications. A high indicates that the design or process can consistently manufacture the product within precisely defined performance specifications. A high indicates that the process can be easily changed to meet diverse performance specifications. The evaluation of requires the mapping of the global feasible space, the solution to which is also discussed.
Issue Section:
Technical Papers
1.
Muccio, E. A., 1992, Plastic Part Technology, ASM International, Material Park, Ohio, p. 176.
2.
Martin, M. V., 1996, “Design for Variety: A Methodology for Understanding the Costs of Product Proliferation,” Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, CA.
3.
Noaker
, P. M.
, 1996
, “CAM’s Solid Modeling Connection
,” Manufacturing Engineering
, 117
(5
), pp. 361
–368
.4.
Blaich
, R.
, 1988
, “From Experience-Global Design
,” Journal of Product Innovation Management
, 5
(4
), p. 296
296
.5.
Taninecz
, G.
, 1995
, “Faster In, Faster Out
,” Industry Week
, 244
(10
), p. 27
27
.6.
Deitz
, D.
, 1996
, “A Re-Engineered Strike Fighter Takes Off
,” Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
, 118
(11
), p. 70
70
.7.
Hegde
, G. G.
, and Kekre
, S.
, 1992
, “Engineering Changes and Time Delays: A Field Investigation
,” International Journal of Production Economics
, 28
(3
), pp. 341
–352
.8.
Dacey, W. E., 1990, “Cost of Engineering Changes at Various Stages of Electro-Mechanical System Development,” Proceedings of the 4th Design for Manufacturability Conference.
9.
Kapoor, D., and Kazmer, D., 1997, “The Definition and Use of the Process Flexibility Index,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, California.
10.
Kazmer, D., Zhu, L., and Hatch, D., “Process Window Derivation with an Application to Optical Media Manufacturing,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., in press.
11.
Zhu, L., and Kazmer, D., “A Performance-Based Representation for Engineering Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., in press.
12.
Zhu, L., 2001, “A Performance-Based Representation for Engineering Design,” Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, p. 195.
13.
Gross, J., and Yellen, J., 1999, “Graph Theory and Applications,” Discrete Mathematics and Applications, K. Rosen, ed., New York, CRC Press.
14.
Dantzig, G. B., 1998, Linear Programming and Extensions, xvi ed., Princeton University Press, p. 627.
15.
Barber
, C. B.
, Dobkin
, D. P.
, and Huhdanpaa
, H.
, 1996
, “The Quickhull Algorithm for Convex Hulls
,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw.
, 22
(4
), pp. 469
–483
.16.
Nazareth, J. L., 1987, Computer Solutions of Linear Programs, Oxford University Press, p. 231.
17.
Kane
, V. E.
, 1986
, “Process Capability Indices
,” J. Quality Technol.
, 18
(1
), pp. 41
–52
.18.
Feng, C.-X., and Kusiak, A., 1995, “Probabilistic Tolerance Synthesis: A Comparative Study,” Proceedings of the 1995 4th Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Nashville, TN.
19.
Boyles
, R. A.
, 1991
, “The Taguchi Capability Index
,” J. Quality Technol.
, 23
(1
), p. 17
17
.20.
Ford, R. B., “Process for the Conceptual Design of Robust Mechanical Systems Going Beyond Parameter Design to Achieve World-Class Quality,” Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford.
21.
Luftig, J. T., and Jordan, V. S., 1998, Design of Experiments in Quality Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York: vii, p. 343.
22.
Kazmer
, D. O.
, and Barkan
, P.
, 1997
, “Multi-Cavity Pressure Control in the Filling and Packing Stages of the Injection Molding Process
,” Polym. Eng. Sci.
, 37
(11
), pp. 1865
–1879
.23.
DeGaspari
, J.
, 2000
, “All in a Day’s Work
,” Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
, 122
(8
), pp. 74
–78
.24.
Oshiro, T., Goto, T., and Ishibashi, J., 1997, “Experimental Study of DVD Substrate Quality by Operating Conditions in Injection Molding,” Annual Technical Conference-ANTEC, Conference Proceedings, Toronto, Canada.
25.
Park, S. J., et al., 1998, “Numerical Analysis of Injection/Compression Molding Process for Center-Gated Disc,” Annual Technical Conference-ANTEC, Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
26.
Shin, J. W., Rhee, D. C., and Park, S. J., 1998, “Experimental Study of Optical Disc Birefringence,” Annual Technical Conference-ANTEC, Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, Ga.
27.
Hatch, D., and Kazmer, D., “Process Transfer Function Development for Optical Media Manufacturing,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, in press.
28.
Suh, N. P., 1990, The Principles of Design, 1 ed., Oxford Series on Advanced Manufacturing, Oxford University Press, Inc., p. 401.
29.
Frey, D. D., Jahangir, E., and Englehart, F., 2001, “Computing the Information Content of Decoupled Designs,” ASME J. Mech. Des., in press.
30.
Roser, C., and Kazmer, D., 2001, “An Economic Design Change Method,” ASME J. Mech. Des., in review.
31.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, 2 ed., Cambridge University Press, p. 569.
32.
Phadke, M. S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
33.
Sottile
, F.
, 1997
, “Real Enumerative Geometry and Effective Algebraic Equivalence
,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra
, 117–118
(1-3
), pp. 601
–615
.Copyright © 2003
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
