Quality variation in resistance spot welding is a major concern in the automotive industry. The relationship between weld quality and various process conditions, including abnormal process conditions, has not yet been systematically studied. This paper investigates this relationship using a newly developed two-stage, sliding-level experiment. In the experiment, welding current is treated as a “slid factor” whose settings are determined based on those of other process variables. Engineering knowledge is applied in statistical model selection. From the analysis, it is found that abnormal process conditions, such as axial misalignment, angular misalignment, poor fitup, edge weld, and electrode wear, significantly affect weld size and thus cause large variation in the weld quality. Although they may help increase the weld size in some cases, abnormal process conditions generally lead to a less robust process. In order to minimize the effects of the abnormal process conditions, a robust parameter design is formulated using the statistical models developed from the experimental data. The analysis suggests that high current and large electrodes should be used for reducing the weld quality variation. Developed in this study, the new experimental design and analysis procedures can also be applied to other processes, where the process variables are inter-dependent.

1.
Gedeon
,
S. A.
,
Sorensen
,
C. D.
,
Ulrich
,
K. T.
, and
Eagar
,
T. W.
,
1987
, “
Measurement of Dynamic Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Resistance Spot Welds
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
66
, No.
12
, pp.
378s–385s
378s–385s
.
2.
Kaiser, J. G., Dunn, G. J., and Eagar, T. W., 1982, “The Effect of Electrical Resistance on Nugget Formation During Spot Welding,” Weld. J. (Miami), June pp. 167s–174s.
3.
Nagel, G. L., and Lee, A., 1988, “
A New Approach to Spot Welding Feedback Control,” SAE Technical Paper, No. 880371.
4.
Karagoulis, M., 1992, “
Control of Materials Processing Variables in Production Resistance Spot Welding,” Proc. AWS Sheet Metal Welding Conference V, Detroit, Mich., Paper No. B5.
5.
Karagoulis
,
M.
,
1995
, “
Nuts-and-Bolts Approach to the Control of Resistance Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
73
, No.
7
, pp.
27
31
.
6.
Holliday
,
R.
,
Parker
,
J. D.
, and
Williams
,
N. T.
,
1995
, “
Electrode Deformation When Spot Welding Coated Steels
,”
Welding in the World
,
35
, No.
3
, pp.
160
164
.
7.
Nied
,
A. H.
,
1984
, “
The Finite Modeling of the Resistance Spot Welding Process
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
63
, No.
4
, pp.
123s–132s
123s–132s
.
8.
Gupta
,
O. P.
, and
De
,
A.
,
1998
, “
An Improved Numerical Modeling for Resistance Spot Welding Process and Its Experimental Verification
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
120
, pp.
246
251
.
9.
Auto Body Consortium/Intelligent Resistance Welding Program (ABC/IRW), 1997, Quarterly Progress Report, No. 202.
10.
Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP), 1995, Weld Quality Test Method Manual, Standardized Test Method Task Force.
11.
Cheng, S., Li, W., and Hu, S. J., 2001, “
Two-stage, Sliding-level Experiments: Design and Analysis,” to be submitted to Technometrics.
12.
Wu, C. F. J., and Hamada, M., 2000, Experiments: Planning, Analysis and Parameter Design Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
13.
Taguchi, G., 1987, System of Experimental Design, Unipub/Kraus International Publications, White Plains, NY.
14.
General Motors Corporation, 1985, Specifications and Procedures for Determining the Weldability of Body Steel Materials.
15.
Zhang
,
H.
,
Hu
,
S. J.
,
Senkara
,
J.
, and
Cheng
,
S.
,
2000
, “
A Statistical Analysis of Expulsion Limits in Resistance Spot Welding
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
122
, No.
3
, pp.
501
510
.
16.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H., 1998, Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
You do not currently have access to this content.