The widely used gas turbine combustor double-walled cooling scheme relies on very small pedestals. In a combustor it is impractical for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to resolve each pedestal individually as that would require a very large amount of grid points and consequent excessive computation time. These pedestals can be omitted from the mesh and their effects captured on the fluid via a pedestal subgrid-scale (SGS) model. The aim is to apply the SGS approach, which takes into account the effects on pressure, velocity, turbulence, and heat transfer, in an unstructured CFD code. The flow inside a two-dimensional (2D) plain duct is simulated to validate the pedestal SGS model, and the results for pressure, velocity, and heat transfer are in good agreement with the measured data. The conjugate heat transfer inside a three-dimensional (3D) duct is also studied to calibrate the heat source term of the SGS model due to the pedestals. The resolved flow in the combustor pedestal tile geometry is numerically investigated using Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) in order to first assess the viability of the RANS and LES to predict the impinging flow and second to provide more validation data for the development of the SGS pedestal correlations. It is found that the complexity of such a flow, with high levels of curvature, impingement, and heat transfer, poses a challenge to the standard RANS models. The LES provides more details of the impinging flow features. The pedestal model is then applied to the complete tile to replace the pedestals. The results are close to both the fully resolved CFD and the measurements. To improve the flow features in the impingement zone, the first two rows were resolved with the mesh and combined with the SGS modeling for the rest of the tile; this gave optimum results of pressure, velocity, and turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) distribution inside the pedestal cooling tile.

References

1.
Haselbach
,
F.
, and
Parker
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Hot End Technology for Advanced, Low Emission Large Civil Aircraft Engines
,”
28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences
, Brisbane, Australia, Sept. 23–28, Paper No.
ICAS 2012-4.10.2
.http://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2012/ABSTRACTS/306.HTM
2.
Thorpe
,
S. J.
,
2008
, “
Project 6: Enhanced Cooling Systems for Low Emissions Combustors Dense Pedestal Cooling Tiles
,” Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, Technical Report No. TT08R01.
3.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
, and
Herbert
,
M. V.
,
1960
, “
Heat transfer Processes in Gasturbine Combustion Chambers
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
174
(1), pp.
463
478
.
4.
Luff
,
J. K.
,
2003
, “
Numerical Prediction of Flow, Thermal and Stress Fields in Gas Turbine Combustor Components
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/15458
5.
Metzger
,
D. E.
,
Berry
,
R. A.
, and
Bronson
,
J. P.
,
1982
, “
Developing Heat Transfer in Rectangular Ducts With Staggered Arrays of Short Pin Fins
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
104
(
4
), pp.
700
706
.
6.
Luff
,
J. K.
, and
McGuirk
,
J. J.
,
2001
, “
Numerical Prediction of Combustor Heatshield Flow and Heat Transfer With Sub-Grid-Scale Modelling of Pedestals
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2001-GT-0144.
7.
Denman
,
P. A.
,
Barker
,
A. G.
,
Charith
,
J. W.
, and
Mcguirk
,
J. J.
,
2003
, “
Modelling and Measurements of Combustor Cooling Tile Flows
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38793.
8.
Zukauskas
,
A. A.
,
1972
,
Heat Transfer From Tubes in Cross Flow. Advances in Heat Transfer
, Vol.
8
,
Academic Press
, New York, pp.
93
106
.
9.
Prithiviraj
,
M.
, and
Andrews
,
M. J.
,
1998
, “
Three Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers—Part I: Foundation and Fluid Mechanics
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer Part A: Appl.
,
33
(
8
), pp.
799
816
.
10.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
,
1974
, “
The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
269
289
.
11.
Shih
,
T. H.
,
Liou
,
W. W.
,
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
,
1994
, “
A New K-Epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No.
NASA-TM-106721
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19950005029
12.
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
1996
, “
On the k-3 Stagnation Point Anomaly
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
17
(
1
), pp.
89
90
.
13.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
14.
Smagorinsky
,
J.
,
1963
, “
General Circulation Experiments With the Primitive Equations
,”
Mon. Weather Rev.
,
91
, pp.
99
164
.
15.
Anand
,
M. S.
,
Eggels
,
R.
,
Staufer
,
M.
,
Zedda
,
M.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
,
2013
, “
An Advanced Unstructured-Grid Finite-Volume Design System for Gas Turbine Combustion Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. GTINDIA2013-3537.http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1838595
16.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
, and
Peric
,
M.
,
2002
,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
, 3rd ed.,
Springer
, Berlin.
You do not currently have access to this content.