Steam methane reforming is the most common process for producing hydrogen in the world. It currently represents the most efficient and mature technology for this purpose. However, because of the high investment costs, this technology is only convenient for large sizes. Furthermore, the cooling of syngas and flue gas produce a great amount of excess steam, which is usually transferred outside the process, for heating purposes or industrial applications. The opportunity of using this additional steam to generate electric power has been studied in this paper. In particular, different power plant schemes have been analyzed, including (i) a Rankine cycle, (ii) a gas turbine simple cycle, and (iii) a gas-steam combined cycle. These configurations have been investigated with the additional feature of CO2 capture and sequestration. The reference plant has been modeled according to state-of-the-art of commercial hydrogen plants: it includes a prereforming reactor, two shift reactors, and a pressure swing adsorption unit for hydrogen purification. The plant has a conversion efficiency of 75% and produces 145,000Sm3hr of hydrogen (equivalent to 435MW on the lower-heating-volume basis) and 63thr of superheated steam. The proposed power plants generate, respectively, 22MW (i), 36MW (ii), and 87MW (iii) without CO2 capture. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the optimum size for each configuration and to investigate the influence of some parameters, such as electricity, natural gas, and steam costs.

1.
Desideri
,
U.
, and
Proietti
,
S.
, 2002, “
CO2 Capture and Removal System for a Gas-Steam Combined Cycle
,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2002-33296.
2.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Mathieu
,
P.
, 1998, “
Comparison of Two CO2 Removal in Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
39
(
16–18
), pp.
1653
1663
.
5.
Terrible
,
J.
,
Shahani
,
G.
,
Gagliardi
,
C.
,
Baade
,
W.
,
Bredehoft
,
R.
, and
Ralston
,
M.
, 1999, “
Consider Using Hydrogen Plants to Cogenerate Power Needs
,”
Hydrocarbon Process.
0887-0284,
78
(
12
), pp.
45
53
.
6.
Consonni
,
S.
, and
Viganò
,
F.
, 2005, “
Decarbonized Hydrogen and Electricity From Natural Gas
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
30
, pp.
701
718
.
7.
Klett
,
M. G.
,
White
,
J. S.
,
Schoff
,
R. L.
, and
Buchanan
,
T. L.
, 2002, “
Hydrogen Production Facilities. Plant Performance and Cost Comparisons
,” U.S. DOE/NETL under Subcontract No. 990700362, Task 50802 by Parson Infrastructure and Technology Group Inc.
8.
Rostrup-Nielsen
,
J. R.
, and
Rostrup-Nielsen
,
T.
, 2002, “
Large-Scale Hydrogen Production
,”
CATTECH
,
6
(
4
), pp.
150
159
.
10.
Contadini
,
J. F.
,
Diniz
,
C. V.
,
Sperling
,
D.
, and
Moore
,
R. M.
, 2000, “
Hydrogen Production Plants: Emissions and Thermal Efficiency Analysis
,” 2nd International Symposium on Technological and Environmental Topics in Transports, October 26–27, Milan.
11.
Spath
,
P. L.
, and
Mann
,
M. K.
, 2001, “
Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Natural Gas Steam Reforming
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-570-27637.
12.
Stocker
,
J.
,
Whysall
,
M.
, and
Miller
,
G. Q.
, 1998,
30 Years of PSA Technology for Hydrogen Purification
,
UOP
, Des Plaines, IL.
13.
Turbomachinery International Handbook
, 2004, Business Journal Inc., Norwalk, CT, Vol.
44
, No. 6, p.
79
.
14.
Chiesa
,
P.
,
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Mazzocchi
,
L.
, 2003, “
Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2003-38205.
15.
Patel
,
N. M.
,
Davis
,
R. A.
,
Eaton
,
N.
,
Carlson
,
D. L.
,
Kessler
,
F.
, and
Khurana
,
V.
, 1994, “
Across-the-Fence Hydrogen Plant Starts up at California Refinery
,”
Oil Gas J.
0030-1388,
92
(
40
), pp.
1
7
.
16.
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
, 2000, “
Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles. Part A: Partial Oxidation
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0163.
17.
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
, 2001, “
Low CO2 Emission Combined Cycles With Natural Gas Reforming, Including NOx Suppression
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0561.
18.
Hamelinck
,
C. N.
, and
Faaij
,
A. P. C.
, 2002, “
Future Prospects for Production of Methanol and Hydrogen From Biomass
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
111
, pp.
1
22
.
19.
De Lorenzo
,
L.
,
Kreutz
,
T. G.
,
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Williams
,
R. H.
, 2005, “
Carbon-Free Hydrogen and Electricity From Coal: Options for Syngas Cooling in Systems Using a Hydrogen Separation Membrane Reactor
,” ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, June 6–9, Reno-Tahoe, ASME Paper No. GT2005-68572.
20.
Williams
,
R. H.
,
Larson
,
E. D.
,
Katofsky
,
R. E.
, and
Chen
,
J.
, 1995, “
Methanol and Hydrogen From Biomass for Transportation, With Comparisons to Methanol and Hydrogen From Natural Gas and Coal
,” PU/CEES Report No. 292, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies,
Princeton University
, Princeton, p.
47
.
21.
Kreutz
,
T.
,
Williams
,
R.
,
Consonni
,
S.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
, 2005, “
Co-Production of Hydrogen, Electricity and CO2 From Coal With Commercially Ready Technology. Part B: Economic Analysis
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
30
, pp.
769
784
.
22.
Sjardin
,
M.
, 2004, “
Techno-Economic Prospects of Small-Scale Membrane Reactors in a Future Hydrogen-Fuelled Tranportation Sector
,”
Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute
, Report No. NWS-I-2004-19.
23.
Roy
,
S.
,
Cox
,
B. G.
,
Adris
,
A. M.
, and
Pruden
,
B. B.
, 1998, “
Economics and Simulation of Fluidized Bed Membrane Reforming
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
23
(
9
), pp.
745
752
.
24.
Molburg
,
J. C.
, and
Doctor
,
R. D.
, 2003, Hydrogen From Steam-Methane Reforming With CO2 Capture, 20th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Sept. 15–19, Pittsburgh.
25.
Leiby
,
S.
, 1994, “
Options for Refinery Hydrogen
,” Process Economics Program, Report No. 212,
SRI International
, Menlo Park, CA.
26.
Bredesen
,
R.
, and
Sogge
,
J.
, 1996, “
Ecological Application of Innovative Membrane Technology in the Chemical Industry
,” UN Seminar, Cetraro, Italy, May 1–4.
27.
Aasberg-Petersen
,
K.
,
Stub Nielsen
,
C.
, and
Lægsgaard Jørgensen
,
S.
, 1998, “
Membrane Reforming for Hydrogen
,”
Catal. Today
0920-5861,
46
, pp.
193
201
.
28.
Padró
,
C. E. G.
, and
Putsche
,
V.
, 1999, “
Survey of the Economics of Hydrogen Technologies
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report No. NREL/TP-570-27079.
29.
Foster-Wheeler
,
1996, “
Decarbonisation of Fossil Fuels
,” IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Report No. P H2∕2.
30.
Simbeck
,
D. R.
, 2004, “
Hydrogen Costs With CO2 Capture
,” 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, Canada, September 5–9.
31.
Blok
,
K.
,
Williams
,
R.
,
Katofsky
,
R.
, and
Hendriks
,
C.
, 1997, “
Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas, Sequestration of Recovered CO2 in Depleted Gas Wells and Enhanced Natural Gas Recovery
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
22
(
2/3
), pp.
161
168
.
32.
EU DG Energy and Transport
, 2005, “
Quarterly Review of European Electricity and Gas Prices
,” Issue 4, July.
33.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
, 2003, “
How To Calculate the True Cost of Steam—A Best Practices Steam Technical Brief
,” DOE/GO-102003-1736, Sept.
You do not currently have access to this content.