This paper considers optimization of rotor system design using stability and vibration response criteria. The initial premise of the study is that the effect of certain design changes can be parametrized in a rotor dynamic model through their influence on the system matrices obtained by finite element modeling. A suitable vibration response measure is derived by considering an unknown axial distribution of unbalanced components having bounded magnitude. It is shown that the worst-case unbalanced response is given by an absolute row-sum norm of the system frequency response matrix. The minimization of this norm is treated through the formulation of a set of linear matrix inequalities that can also incorporate design parameter constraints and stability criteria. The formulation can also be extended to cover uncertain or time-varying system dynamics arising, for example, due to speed-dependent bearing coefficients or gyroscopic effects. Numerical solution of the matrix inequalities is tackled using an iterative method that involves standard convex optimization routines. The method is applied in a case study that considers the optimal selection of bearing support stiffness and damping levels to minimize the worst-case vibration of a flexible rotor over a finite speed range. The main restriction in the application of the method is found to be the slow convergence of the numerical routines that occurs with high-order models and/or high problem complexity.

1.
Shiau
,
T. N.
, and
Hwang
,
J. L.
, 1988, “
Minimum Weight Design of a Rotor Bearing System With Multiple Frequency Constraints
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
110
, pp.
592
599
.
2.
Shiau
,
T. N.
, and
Chang
,
J. R.
, 1993, “
Multi-Objective Optimization of Rotor-Bearing System With Critical Speed Constraints
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
115
, pp.
246
255
.
3.
Chen
,
T. Y.
, and
Wang
,
B. P.
, 1993, “
Optimal Design of Rotor-Bearing System With Eigenvalue Constraints
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
115
, pp.
256
260
.
4.
Huang
,
S. C.
, and
Lin
,
C. A.
, 2002, “
Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Undamped Rotor Critical Speeds to Supports Stiffness
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
124
(
1
), pp.
296
301
.
5.
Choi
,
B. K.
, and
Yang
,
B. S.
, 2001, “
Multiobjective Optimum Design of Rotor-Bearing Systems With Dynamic Constraints Using Immune-Genetic Algorithm
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
123
, pp.
78
81
.
6.
Shiau
,
T. N.
,
Kang
,
C. H.
, and
Liu
,
D. S.
, 2004, “
Optimization Combines the Genetic Algorithms With Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Rotor-Bearing Systems Under Dynamic Behavior Constraints
,”
Proceeding of ASME Turbo Expo 2004
,
Vienna
,
ASME
, New York, ASME Paper No. GT2004–54058.
7.
Angantyr
,
A.
, 2004, “
Constrained Optimization of Rotor-Bearing Systems by Evolutionary Algorithms
,” Licentiate thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
8.
Angantyr
,
A.
,
Andersson
,
J.
, and
Aidanpää
,
J.-O.
, 2003, “
Constrained Optimization Based on a Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm
,”
Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation
,
Canberra
, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp.
1560
1567
.
9.
Boyd
,
S.
,
El Ghaoui
,
L.
,
Feron
,
E.
, and
Balakrishnan
,
V.
, 1994,
Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory
,
SIAM
, Philadelphia.
10.
VanAntwerp
,
J.
, and
Braatz
,
R. D.
, 2000, “
A Tutorial on Linear and Bilinear Matrix Inequalities
,”
J. Process Control
0959-1524,
10
, pp.
363
385
.
11.
Cole
,
M. O. T.
,
Keogh
,
P. S.
, and
Burrows
,
C. R.
, 1998, “
Vibration Control of a Flexible Rotor/Magnetic Bearing System Subject to Direct Forcing and Base Motion Disturbances
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
212
(
7
), pp.
535
546
.
12.
Sivrioglu
,
S.
, and
Nonami
,
K.
, 1996, “
LMI Approach to Gain Scheduled Control Beyond PID Control for Gyroscopic Rotor Magnetic Bearing System
,”
Proceedings of 35th Conference on Decision and Control
,
Kobe
, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp.
3694
3699
.
13.
Fujimori
,
A.
, 2004, “
Optimization of Static Output Feedback Using Substitutive LMI Formulation
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
49
(
6
), pp.
995
999
.
14.
Cao
,
Y.-Y.
,
Lam
,
J.
, and
Sun
,
Y.-X.
, 1998, “
Static Output Feedback Stabilization: An ILMI Approach
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
34
(
12
), pp.
1641
1645
.
15.
Nelson
,
H. D.
, and
McVaugh
,
J. M.
, 1976, “
The Dynamics of Rotor-Bearing Systems Using Finite Elements
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
98
, pp.
593
699
.
16.
Gahinet
,
G.
,
Nemirovski
,
A.
,
Laub
,
A. J.
, and
Chilali
,
M.
, 1995,
LMI Control Toolbox
,
The Mathworks, Inc.
You do not currently have access to this content.