The unsteady flow field due to blade passing at the pump∕turbine interface of a torque converter was studied. The current geometry is wide and has a large outer to inner radius ratio. A laser velocimeter was used to measure the periodic velocity components at four operating conditions determined by the speed ratios between the turbine and pump of 0.065 (near stall), 0.600, 0.800, and 0.875 (coupling point). The flow fields at the pump exit and turbine inlet planes were visualized and are presented. Using instantaneous pump and turbine blade positions with the velocity data, animations (“slow-motion movies”) are generated to effectively visualize and understand the unsteady behavior. The turbine inlet flow was markedly periodic due to the exiting jet∕wake from the upstream pump passage; however, the pump exit flow field showed little dependence on the turbine blade positions. The highest unsteadiness was seen for the highest speed ratios. Four “shots” from the sequences of one cycle for all speed ratios and each plane are presented herein. The results are also compared to unsteady results for a previously examined torque converter with a small radius ratio to determine the effect of parametric geometric changes on the flow field. Generally, the unsteady velocity fields show no significant difference for the two geometries—the trends are the same.

1.
Whitehead
,
L. D.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
, 1999, “
Velocity Measurements in an Automotive Torque Converter, Part I - Average Pump Measurements
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
42
, pp.
697
706
.
2.
Claudel
,
W. D.
, 1997, “
A Comparison of the Internal Flow Fields of Three Automotive Torque Converter Pumps using Laser Velocimetry
,” M.S. thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
3.
Browarzik
,
V.
, 1994, “
Experimental Investigation of Rotor∕Rotor Interaction in a Hydrodynamic Torque Converter using Hot Film Anemometry
,”
39th International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition
, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 13–16, ASME Paper No. 94-GT-246.
4.
Marathe
,
B. V.
, and
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
, 1995, “
Experimental Investigation of Steady and Unsteady Flow Field Downstream of an Automotive Torque Converter Turbine and Stator
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
1023-621X,
2
, pp.
67
84
.
5.
Marathe
,
B. V.
, and
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
, 1997, “
Experimental Investigation of Steady and Unsteady Flow Field Upstream and Downstream of an Automotive Torque Converter Pump
,”
1997 ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting
, Vancouver, June 22-26, ASME Paper No. FEDSM97-3353.
6.
Dong
,
Y.
,
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
, and
Maddock
,
D. G.
, 1997, “
Steady and Unsteady Flow Field at Pump and Turbine Exit of a Torque Converter
,”
1997 ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting
, Vancouver, June 22–26, ASME Paper No. FEDSM97-3351.
7.
Brun
,
K.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
, 1994, “
A Method to Measure Periodic Velocity Fields in Multi-Element Turbomachines with Discrete Sampling
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
0957-0233,
5
, pp.
418
425
,.
8.
Brun
,
K.
,
Flack
,
R. D.
, and
Gruver
,
J. K.
, 1996, “
Laser Velocimeter Measurements in the Pump of a Torque Converter, Part II - Unsteady Measurements
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, pp.
570
577
.
9.
Brun
,
K.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
, 1997, “
Laser Velocimeter Measurements in the Turbine of an Automotive Torque Converter, Part II - Unsteady Measurements
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
655
662
.
10.
Christen
,
B.
,
Gruber
,
M.
,
Hotho
,
M.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
, 1999, “
Effect of Pump Exit Angle on the Unsteady Flow at the Pump Turbine Interface of an Automotive Torque Converter
,”
3rd ASME-JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference
, San Francisco, CA, July 18–23, ASME Paper No. FEDSM99-6995.
11.
Whitehead
,
L. D.
, 1995, “
A Comparison of the Internal Flow Fields of Two Automotive Torque Converters using Laser Velocimetry
,” M.S. thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
12.
Flack
,
R. D.
, and
Whitehead
,
L. D.
, 1997, “
Unsteady Velocities at the Pump-Turbine Interface of an Automotive Torque Converter
,”
Proc. 7th International Conference on Laser Anemometry
, Karlsruhe, Germany, September 8–11, pp.
263
270
.
You do not currently have access to this content.