Abstract

Site utility, without a doubt, is one of the major units in process industries that consumed a lot of fossil fuels and significantly emitted emission pollution. In this paper, a systematic procedure was proposed to optimize the utility system's design and integration based on a targeting approach as process integration technique, exergetic, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental analysis associated with life cycle assessment (LCA), and multi-objective optimization through water cycle and genetic algorithms. Total site analysis was performed to provide an essential understanding of the equipment's characteristics and interactions in the site utility system. It also aims for power production and the temperature of the boiler and each steam level with acceptable accuracy. Furthermore, the exergetic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses were presented to declare the effects of irreversibility, economic, and environmental impacts on the system. In this paper, to show the proposed method's applicability, the optimal design of a site utility associated with a petrochemical complex has been considered. First, the optimal design is performed based on minimization of total annualized costs (TAC) as one-objective function through star software, genetic algorithm (GA), water cycle algorithm (WCA), proposed GA, and proposed WCA method. In the next phase, the optimal design is done based on MOGA, MOWCA, proposed MOGA, and proposed MOWCA methods based on maximum exergetic efficiency, and freshwater production, and minimization of exergetic cost, and total environmental exergetic impact. Results show by using the new procedure, the optimum solution has been achieved by a significant reduction of computational time.

References

1.
Dhole
,
V. R.
, and
Linnhoff
,
B.
,
1993
, “
Total Site Targets for Fuel, Cogeneration, Emissions, and Cooling
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
17
(
1
), pp.
S101
S109
.
2.
Klemeš
,
J.
,
Dhole
,
V. R.
,
Raissi
,
K.
,
Perry
,
S. J.
, and
Puigjaner
,
L.
,
1997
, “
Targeting and Design Methodology for Reduction of Fuel, Power and CO2 on Total Sites
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
17
(
8
), pp.
993
1003
.
3.
Raissi
,
K.
,
1994
,
Total Site Integration
,
University of Manchester
,
Manchester, UK
.
4.
Mavromatis
,
S. P.
, and
Kokossis
,
A. C.
,
1998
, “
Conceptual Optimisation of Utility Networks for Operational Variations—II. Network Development and Optimisation
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
53
(
8
), pp.
1609
1630
.
5.
Varbanov
,
P. S.
,
Doyle
,
S.
, and
Smith
,
R.
,
2004
, “
Modelling and Optimization of Utility Systems
,”
Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
,
82
(
5
), pp.
561
578
.
6.
Harell
,
D. A.
,
Resource Conservation and Allocation via Process Integration
,
Doctoral dissertation
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
7.
Sorin
,
M.
, and
Hammache
,
A.
,
2005
, “
A New Thermodynamic Model for Shaftwork Targeting on Total Sites
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
25
(
7
), pp.
961
972
.
8.
Mohan
,
T.
, and
El-Halwagi
,
M. M.
,
2007
, “
An Algebraic Targeting Approach for Effective Utilization of Biomass in Combined Heat and Power Systems Through Process Integration
,”
Clean Technol. Environ. Policy
,
9
(
1
), pp.
13
25
.
9.
Medina-Flores
,
J. M.
, and
Picón-Núñez
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Modelling the Power Production of Single and Multiple Extraction Steam Turbines
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
65
(
9
), pp.
2811
2820
.
10.
Bandyopadhyay
,
S.
,
Varghese
,
J.
, and
Bansal
,
V.
,
2010
, “
Targeting for Cogeneration Potential Through Total Site Integration
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
30
(
1
), pp.
6
14
.
11.
Ghannadzadeh
,
A.
,
Perry
,
S.
, and
Smith
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Cogeneration Targeting for Site Utility Systems
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
43
, pp.
60
66
.
12.
Kapil
,
A.
,
Bulatov
,
I.
,
Smith
,
R.
, and
Kim
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Site-Wide Low-Grade Heat Recovery With a New Cogeneration Targeting Method
,”
Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
,
90
(
5
), pp.
677
689
.
13.
Tarighaleslami
,
A. H.
,
Walmsley
,
T. G.
,
Atkins
,
M. J.
,
Walmsley
,
M. R. W.
,
Liew
,
P. Y.
, and
Neale
,
J. R.
,
2017
, “
A Unified Total Site Heat Integration Targeting Method for Isothermal and Non-isothermal Utilities
,”
Energy
,
119
, pp.
10
25
.
14.
Ren
,
X.-Y.
,
Jia
,
X.-X.
,
Varbanov
,
P. S.
,
Klemeš
,
J. J.
, and
Liu
,
Z.-Y.
,
2018
, “
Targeting the Cogeneration Potential for Total Site Utility Systems
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
170
, pp.
625
635
.
15.
Varbanov
,
P. S.
,
Fodor
,
Z.
, and
Klemeš
,
J. J.
,
2012
, “
Total Site Targeting With Process Specific Minimum Temperature Difference (ΔTmin)
,”
Energy
,
44
(
1
), pp.
20
28
.
16.
Khoshgoftar Manesh
,
M. H.
,
Ghalami
,
H.
,
Amidpour
,
M.
, and
Hamedi
,
M. H.
,
2013
, “
Optimal Coupling of Site Utility Steam Network With MED-RO Desalination Through Total Site Analysis and Exergoeconomic Optimization
,”
Desalination
,
316
, pp.
42
52
.
17.
Ahn
,
Y.
, and
Han
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Economic Optimization of Integrated Network for Utility Supply and Carbon Dioxide Mitigation With Multi-site and Multi-period Demand Uncertainties
,”
Appl. Energy
,
220
, pp.
723
734
.
18.
PouyanRad
,
M. P.
,
Khoshgoftar Manesh
,
M. H.
,
Rosen
,
M. A.
,
Amidpour
,
M.
, and
Hamedi
,
M. H.
,
2016
, “
New Procedure for Design and Exergoeconomic Optimization of Site Utility System Considering Reliability
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
94
, pp.
478
490
.
19.
Tarighaleslami
,
A. H.
,
Walmsley
,
T. G.
,
Atkins
,
M. J.
,
Walmsley
,
M. R. W.
, and
Neale
,
J. R.
,
2017
, “
Total Site Heat Integration: Utility Selection and Optimisation Using Cost and Exergy Derivative Analysis
,”
Energy
,
141
, pp.
949
963
.
20.
Pouransari
,
N.
,
Bocquenet
,
G.
, and
Maréchal
,
F.
,
2014
, “
Site-Scale Process Integration and Utility Optimization With Multi-level Energy Requirement Definition
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
85
, pp.
774
783
.
21.
Sun
,
L.
,
Gai
,
L.
, and
Smith
,
R.
,
2017
, “
Site Utility System Optimization With Operation Adjustment Under Uncertainty
,”
Appl. Energy
,
186
, pp.
450
456
.
22.
Zhao
,
L.
, and
You
,
F.
,
2019
, “
A Data-Driven Approach for Industrial Utility Systems Optimization Under Uncertainty
,”
Energy
,
182
, pp.
559
569
.
23.
Shahidian Akbar
,
G.
,
Salarian
,
H.
, and
Ataei
,
A.
,
2019
, “
A Novel Approach to Integration of Hot Oil and Combined Heat and Power Systems Through Pinch Technology and Mathematical Programming
,”
Energy Sources, Part A
,
41
(
24
), pp.
3026
3045
.
24.
Alabdulkarem
,
A.
, and
Rahmanian
,
N.
,
2020
, “
Steam Consumption Minimization Using Genetic Algorithm Optimization Method: An Industrial Case Study
,”
Energy Sources, Part A
, pp.
1
15
.
25.
Zhang
,
Q.
,
Zhao
,
T.
,
Ni
,
T.
, and
Gao
,
J.
,
2019
, “
Optimization Models for Operation of a Steam Power System in Integrated Iron and Steel Works
,”
Energy Sources, Part A
, pp.
1
15
.
26.
Hu
,
C. W.
, and
Ahmad
,
S.
,
1994
, “
Total Site Heat Integration Using the Utility System
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
18
(
8
), pp.
729
742
.
27.
Bejan
,
A.
,
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, and
Moran
,
M.
,
1996
,
Thermal Design and Optimization
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
28.
Zhang
,
C.
,
Wang
,
Y.
,
Zheng
,
C.
, and
Lou
,
X.
,
2006
, “
Exergy Cost Analysis of a Coal Fired Power Plant Based on Structural Theory of Thermoeconomics
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
47
(
7–8
), pp.
817
843
.
29.
Eskandar
,
H.
,
Sadollah
,
A.
,
Bahreininejad
,
A.
, and
Hamdi
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Water Cycle Algorithm—A Novel Metaheuristic Optimization Method for Solving Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
110–111
, pp.
151
166
.
30.
Sadollah
,
A.
,
Eskandar
,
H.
,
Lee
,
H. M.
,
Yoo
,
D. G.
, and
Kim
,
J. H.
,
2016
,
Water Cycle Algorithm: A Detailed Standard Code
.
SoftwareX, 5
, pp.
37
43
.
31.
Sadollah
,
A.
,
Eskandar
,
H.
, and
Kim
,
J. H.
,
2015
, “
Water Cycle Algorithm for Solving Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Problems
,”
Appl. Soft Comput.
,
27
, pp.
279
298
.
You do not currently have access to this content.