Repetitive controllers have been shown to be effective for tracking periodic reference commands or for rejecting periodic disturbances. Typical repetitive controllers are synthesized in temporal domain where the periods of the reference or disturbance signals are assumed to be known and stationary. For periodic references and disturbances with varying periods, researchers usually resort to adaptive and robust control approaches. For rotational motion systems where the disturbances or reference signals are spatially periodic (i.e., periodic with respect to angular displacement), the temporal period of the disturbance and reference signals will be inversely proportional to the rotational speed and vary accordingly. Motivating by reducing halftone banding for laser printers, we propose a design framework for synthesizing spatially sampled repetitive controller by reformulating a linear time-invariant system subject to spatially periodic disturbances using angular displacement as the independent variable. The resulting nonlinear system can be represented as a quasi-linear parameter-varying (quasi-LPV) system with the angular velocity as one of the varying state-dependent parameters. An LPV self-gain–scheduling controller that includes a spatially sampled repetitive control can be designed to take into consideration bounded model uncertainty and input nonlinearity, such as actuator saturation. Using the signal from an optical encoder pulse as a triggering interrupt, experimental results verified the effectiveness of the proposed approach in rejecting spatially periodic disturbances that cannot be compensated with fixed period temporal repetitive controllers.

1.
Tomizuka
,
M.
,
Tsao
,
T. C.
, and
Chew
,
K. K.
, 1989, “
Analysis and Synthesis of Discrete-Time Repetitive Controllers
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
111
(
3
), pp.
353
358
.
2.
Onuki
,
Y.
, and
Ishioka
,
H.
, 2001, “
Compensation for Repeatable Tracking Errors in Hard Drives Using Discrete-Time Repetitive Controllers
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
1083-4435,
6
(
2
), pp.
132
136
.
3.
Hillerstrom
,
G.
, 1996, “
Adaptive Suppression of Vibrations—A Repetitive Control Approach
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
1063-6536,
4
(
1
), pp.
72
78
.
4.
Manayathara
,
T. J.
,
Tsao
,
T.-C.
,
Bentsman
,
J.
, and
Ross
,
D.
, 1996, “
Rejection of Unknown Periodic Load Disturbances in Continuous Steel Casting Process Using Learning Repetitive Control Approach
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
1063-6536,
4
(
3
), pp.
259
265
.
5.
Wit
,
C. C.
, and
Praly
,
L.
, 2000, “
Adaptive Eccentricity Compensation
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
1063-6536,
8
(
5
), pp.
757
766
.
6.
Nakano
,
M.
,
She
,
J.-H.
,
Mastuo
,
Y.
, and
Hino
,
T.
, 1996, “
Elimination of Position-Dependent Disturbances in Constant-Speed-Rotation Control Systems
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
0967-0661,
4
, pp.
1241
1248
.
7.
Chen
,
C.-L.
,
Chiu
,
G. T.-C.
, and
Allebach Jan
,
P.
, 2006, “
Robust Spatial-Sampling Controller Design for Banding Reduction in Electrophotographic Process
,”
J. Imaging Sci. Technol.
1062-3701,
50
(
6
), pp.
530
536
.
8.
Mahawan
,
B.
, and
Luo
,
Z.-H.
, 2000, “
Repetitive Control of Tracking Systems With Time-Varying Periodic References
,”
Int. J. Control
0020-7179,
73
(
1
), pp.
1
10
.
9.
Becker
,
G.
, and
Packard
,
A. K.
, 1994, “
Robust Performance of Linear Parametrically Varying Systems Using Parametrically-Dependent Linear Feedback
,”
Syst. Control Lett.
0167-6911,
23
(
3
), pp.
205
215
.
10.
Apkarian
,
P.
,
Gahinet
,
P.
, and
Becker
,
G.
, 1995, “
Self-Scheduled H∞ Control of Linear Parameter Varying Systems: A Design Example
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
31
(
9
), pp.
1251
1261
.
11.
Gahinet
,
P.
, 1996, “
Explicit Controller Formulas for LMI-Based H∞ Synthesis
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
32
(
7
), pp.
1007
1014
.
12.
Gahinet
,
P.
, and
Apkarian
,
P.
, 1994, “
A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach to H∞ Control
,”
Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control
1049-8923,
4
, pp.
421
448
.
13.
Hanson
,
R. D.
, and
Tsao
,
T.-C.
, 2000, “
Periodic Sampling Interval Repetitive Control and Its Application to Variable Spindle Speed Noncircular Turning Process
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
122
, pp.
560
566
.
14.
Chen
,
T.
, and
Francis
,
B.
, 1995,
Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems
,
Springer
,
New York
.
15.
Wu
,
F.
,
Grigoriadis
,
K. M.
, and
Packard
,
A.
, 2000, “
Anti-Windup Controller Design Using Linear Parameter-Varying Control Methods
,”
Int. J. Control
0020-7179,
73
(
12
), pp.
1104
1114
.
16.
Shamma
,
J.-S.
, and
Athans
,
M.
, 1992, “
Gain Scheduling: Potential Hazards and Possible Remedies
,”
IEEE Control Syst. Mag.
0272-1708,
12
, pp.
101
107
.
17.
Gahinet
,
P.
, and
Apkarian
,
P.
, 1995, “
A Convex Characterization of Gain-Scheduled H∞ Controllers
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
40
(
5
), pp.
853
864
.
18.
Gahinet
,
P.
,
Nemirovski
,
A.
,
Laub
,
A. J.
, and
Chilali
,
M.
, 1995,
MATLAB LMI Control Toolbox
,
Mathworks
,
Natick, MA
.
19.
Berkovitz
,
L. D.
, 2002,
Convexity and Optimization in Rn
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.