Design changes are necessary to sustain the product against competition. Due to technical, social, and financial constraints, an organization can only implement a few of many change alternatives. Hence, a wise selection of a change alternative is fundamentally influential for the growth of the organization. Organizations lack knowledge bases to effectively capture rationale for a design change; i.e., identifying the potential effects a design change. In this paper, (1) we propose a knowledge base called multiple-domain matrix that comprises the relationships among different parameters that are building blocks of a product and its manufacturing system. (2) Using the indirect change propagation method, we capture these relationships to identify the potential effects of a design change. (3) We propose a cost-based metric called change propagation impact (CPI) to quantify the effects that are captured from the multiple-domain matrix. These individual pieces of work are integrated into a web-based tool called Vatram. The tool is deployed in a design environment to evaluate its usefulness and usability.

References

1.
Sarkar
,
P.
, and
Chakrabarti
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Assessing Design Creativity
,”
Des. Stud.
,
32
(
4
), pp.
348
383
.
2.
Giffin
,
M.
,
de Weck
,
O.
,
Bounova
,
G.
,
Keller
,
R.
,
Eckert
,
C.
, and
Clarkson
,
P. J.
,
2009
, “
Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
(
8
), p.
081001
.
3.
Pimmler
,
T. U.
, and
Eppinger
,
S. D.
,
1994
,
Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
4.
Ahmad
,
N.
,
Wynn
,
D. C.
, and
Clarkson
,
P. J.
,
2013
, “
Change Impact on a Product and Its Redesign Process: A Tool for Knowledge Capture and Reuse
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
24
(
3
), pp.
219
244
.
5.
Siddharth
,
L.
, and
Sarkar
,
P.
,
2017
, “
A Methodology for Predicting the Effect of Engineering Design Changes
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
60
, pp.
452
457
.
6.
Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 2007,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
, Springer London.
7.
Bracewell
,
R.
,
Wallace
,
K.
,
Moss
,
M.
, and
Knott
,
D.
,
2009
, “
Capturing Design Rationale
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
41
(
3
), pp.
173
186
.
8.
Heinrich
,
H. W.
,
1941
,
Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach
, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
9.
Ishikawa
,
K.
,
1976
,
Guide to Quality Control
, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
10.
Ferry
,
T. S.
,
1988
,
Modern Accident Investigation and Analysis
,
Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ.
11.
Kunz
,
W.
, and
Rittel
,
H. W.
,
1970
,
Issues as Elements of Information Systems
, Vol.
131
,
Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California Berkeley
,
Berkeley, CA
.
12.
Leveson
,
N.
,
2004
, “
A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems
,”
Saf. Sci.
,
42
(
4
), pp.
237
270
.
13.
Fenves
,
S. J.
,
2001
,
Core Product Model for Representing Design Information
,
U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology
, Gaithersburg, MD.
14.
Bohm
,
M. R.
,
Stone
,
R. B.
, and
Szykman
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Enhancing Virtual Product Representations for Advanced Design Repository Systems
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
5
(
4
), pp.
360
372
.
15.
Murphy
,
J.
,
Fu
,
K.
,
Otto
,
K.
,
Yang
,
M.
,
Jensen
,
D.
, and
Wood
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
10
), p.
101102
.
16.
Goel
,
A. K.
,
Vattam
,
S.
,
Wiltgen
,
B.
, and
Helms
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Cognitive, Collaborative, Conceptual and Creative—Four Characteristics of the Next Generation of Knowledge-Based CAD Systems: A Study in Biologically Inspired Design
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
44
(
10
), pp.
879
900
.
17.
Chakrabarti
,
A.
,
Siddharth
,
L.
,
Dinakar
,
M.
,
Panda
,
M.
,
Palegar
,
N.
, and
Keshwani
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Idea-Inspire 3.0—A Tool for Analogical Design
,”
International Conference on Research Into Design (ICoRD'17)
, Guwahati, India, Jan. 9–11, p.
10
.
18.
Siddharth
,
L.
,
Sarkar
,
P.
, and
Chakrabarti
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Modelling and Structuring the Knowledge of Failures Using Design Structure Matrix (DSM) for Reuse During Product Life-Cycle
,”
Sixth International Conference on Product Lifecycle Modeling, Simulation and Synthesis
(
PLMSS
), Pune, India, pp. 104–115.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321836261_Modelling_and_Structuring_the_Knowledge_of_Failures_using_Design_Structure_Matrix_DSM_for_Reuse_during_Product_Life-Cycle
19.
Steward
,
D. V.
,
1981
, “
The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
,
28
(
3
), pp.
71
74
.
20.
Clarkson
,
P. J.
,
Simons
,
C.
, and
Eckert
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
126
(
5
), pp.
788
797
.
21.
Hamraz
,
B.
,
Caldwell
,
N. H.
, and
Clarkson
,
P. J.
,
2013
, “
A Matrix-Calculation-Based Algorithm for Numerical Change Propagation Analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
,
60
(
1
), pp.
186
198
.
22.
Browning
,
T. R.
,
2001
, “
Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Management
,
48
(
3
), pp.
292
306
.
23.
Wynn
,
D. C.
,
Wyatt
,
D. F.
,
Nair
,
S. M.
, and
Clarkson
,
P. J.
,
2010
, “
An Introduction to the Cambridge Advanced Modeller
,”
First International Conference on Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes
(
MMEP
), Cambridge, UK, July 19–20.https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/243227/10-MMEP10-Wynn-IntroductionToTheCAM.pdf;jsessionid=5B330F206ADD5091E15550F89F762857?sequence=1
24.
Black
,
J. T.
,
1991
,
The Design of the Factory With a Future
,
McGraw-Hill Companies
, New York.
25.
Hamraz
,
B.
, and
Clarkson
,
P. J.
,
2015
, “
Industrial Evaluation of FBS Linkage—A Method to Support Engineering Change Management
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
26
(
1–3
), pp.
24
47
.
26.
Shankar
,
P.
,
Morkos
,
B.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2012
, “
Reasons for Change Propagation: A Case Study in an Automotive OEM
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
291
303
.
27.
Bracewell, R. H., Ahmed, S., and Wallace, K. M., 2004, “
DRed and Design Folders: A Way of Capturing, Storing and Passing on Knowledge Generated During Design Projects
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2004-57165.
28.
Gupta
,
S.
,
2017
, “
A Framework for Component Selection 2 Based on Multi-Attribute Evaluations
,”
Research Into Design for Communities
, Vol. 2, Springer, Singapore.
29.
Fantoni
,
G.
,
Apreda
,
R.
,
Dell'Orletta
,
F.
, and
Monge
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Automatic Extraction of Function–Behaviour–State Information From Patents
,”
Adv. Eng. Inf.
,
27
(
3
), pp.
317
334
.
30.
Sarkar
,
S.
,
Dong
,
A.
,
Henderson
,
J. A.
, and
Robinson
,
P.
,
2014
, “
Spectral Characterization of Hierarchical Modularity in Product Architectures
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
1
), p.
011006
.
You do not currently have access to this content.