The mechanical effect of a partial thickness tear or laceration of a tendon is analytically modeled under various assumptions and results are compared with previous experimental data from porcine flexor tendons. Among several fibril-level models considered, a shear-lag model that incorporates fibril–matrix interaction and a fibril–fibril interaction defined by the contact area of the interposed matrix best matched published data for tendons with shallow cuts (less than 50% of the cross-sectional area). Application of this model to the case of many disrupted fibrils is based on linear superposition and is most successful when more fibrils are incorporated into the model. An equally distributed load sharing model for the fraction of remaining intact fibrils was inadequate in that it overestimates the strength for a cut less than half of the tendon's cross-sectional area. In a broader sense, results imply that shear-lag contributes significantly to the general mechanical behavior of tendons when axial loads are nonuniformly distributed over a cross section, although the predominant hierarchical level and microstructural mediators for this behavior require further inquiry.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2014
Research-Article
Evaluation of Global Load Sharing and Shear-Lag Models to Describe Mechanical Behavior in Partially Lacerated Tendons
Marco Pensalfini,
Marco Pensalfini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Bologna
,Bologna 33, 40126
Italy
;Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl,
Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Jaclyn Kondratko-Mittnacht,
Jaclyn Kondratko-Mittnacht
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Roderic Lakes,
Roderic Lakes
Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Materials Science,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Ray Vanderby
Ray Vanderby
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Materials Science Program,
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Marco Pensalfini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Bologna
,Bologna 33, 40126
Italy
;Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Jaclyn Kondratko-Mittnacht
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Roderic Lakes
Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Materials Science,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
Ray Vanderby
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedic and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Materials Science Program,
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
1Corresponding author.
2Present address: 5059 Wi Institute Medical Research, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705.
Manuscript received February 6, 2014; final manuscript received May 14, 2014; accepted manuscript posted May 21, 2014; published online July 15, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Guy M. Genin.
J Biomech Eng. Sep 2014, 136(9): 091006 (12 pages)
Published Online: July 15, 2014
Article history
Received:
February 6, 2014
Revision Received:
May 14, 2014
Accepted:
May 21, 2014
Citation
Pensalfini, M., Duenwald-Kuehl, S., Kondratko-Mittnacht, J., Lakes, R., and Vanderby, R. (July 15, 2014). "Evaluation of Global Load Sharing and Shear-Lag Models to Describe Mechanical Behavior in Partially Lacerated Tendons." ASME. J Biomech Eng. September 2014; 136(9): 091006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027714
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A New Dissipation Function to Model the Rate-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Semilunar Valve Leaflets
J Biomech Eng (July 2023)
Muscle Constitutive Model With a Tangent Modulus Approximation: Ansys Implementation and Verification
J Biomech Eng (July 2023)
Related Articles
Mechanical Compromise of Partially Lacerated Flexor Tendons
J Biomech Eng (January,2013)
Recruitment Viscoelasticity of the Tendon
J Biomech Eng (November,2009)
Multiscale Mechanical Evaluation of Human Supraspinatus Tendon Under Shear Loading After Glycosaminoglycan Reduction
J Biomech Eng (July,2017)
The Role of Fiber-Matrix Interactions in a Nonlinear Fiber-Reinforced Strain Energy Model of Tendon
J Biomech Eng (April,2005)
Related Chapters
Creating and Eliminating Workplace Hazards by Design
An Instructional Aid For Occupational Safety and Health in Mechanical Engineering Design
Appendix F—Tendon End Anchor Testing
Commentary on Article CC-3000 Design
IWE and IWL
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes