Measures of mean cartilage thickness over predefined regions in the femoral plate using magnetic resonance imaging have provided important insights into the characteristics of knee osteoarthritis (OA), however, this quantification method suffers from the limited ability to detect OA-related differences between knees and loses potentially important information regarding spatial variations in cartilage thickness. The objectives of this study were to develop a new method for analyzing patterns of femoral cartilage thickness and to test the following hypotheses: (1) asymptomatic knees have similar thickness patterns, (2) thickness patterns differ with knee OA, and (3) thickness patterns are more sensitive than mean thicknesses to differences between OA conditions. Bi-orthogonal thickness patterns were extracted from thickness maps of segmented magnetic resonance images in the medial, lateral, and trochlea compartments. Fifty asymptomatic knees were used to develop the method and establish reference asymptomatic patterns. Another subgroup of 20 asymptomatic knees and three subgroups of 20 OA knees each with a Kellgren/Lawrence grade (KLG) of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were selected for hypotheses testing. The thickness patterns were similar between asymptomatic knees (coefficient of multiple determination between 0.8 and 0.9). The thickness pattern alterations, i.e., the differences between the thickness patterns of an individual knee and reference asymptomatic thickness patterns, increased with increasing OA severity (Kendall correlation between 0.23 and 0.47) and KLG 2 and 3 knees had significantly larger thickness pattern alterations than asymptomatic knees in the three compartments. On average, the number of significant differences detected between the four subgroups was 4.5 times greater with thickness pattern alterations than mean thicknesses. The increase was particularly marked in the medial compartment, where the number of significant differences between subgroups was 10 times greater with thickness pattern alterations than mean thickness measurements. Asymptomatic knees had characteristic regional thickness patterns and these patterns were different in medial OA knees. Assessing the thickness patterns, which account for the spatial variations in cartilage thickness and capture both cartilage thinning and swelling, could enhance the capacity to detect OA-related differences between knees.
Skip Nav Destination
Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308,
e-mail: tandriac@stanford.edu
Article navigation
October 2013
Research-Article
Patterns of Femoral Cartilage Thickness are Different in Asymptomatic and Osteoarthritic Knees and Can be Used to Detect Disease-Related Differences Between Samples
Sean F. Scanlan,
Sean F. Scanlan
e-mail: scanlansean@gmail.com
Stanford University,
Department of Mechanical Engineering
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 061
,496 Lomita Mall
,Stanford
, CA 94305-4308
Search for other works by this author on:
Jenifer C. Erhart-Hledik,
Katerina Blazek,
Katerina Blazek
e-mail: kblazek@stanford.edu
Stanford University,
Durand Building 061,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Department of Mechanical Engineering
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 061,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Center for Tissue Regeneration,
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas P. Andriacchi
Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308,
e-mail: tandriac@stanford.edu
Thomas P. Andriacchi
Department of Mechanical Engineering
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Center for Tissue Regeneration,
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207;
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207;
Department of Orthopedic Surgery
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308,
e-mail: tandriac@stanford.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Julien Favre
e-mail: jfavre@stanford.edu
Sean F. Scanlan
e-mail: scanlansean@gmail.com
Stanford University,
Department of Mechanical Engineering
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 061
,496 Lomita Mall
,Stanford
, CA 94305-4308
Jenifer C. Erhart-Hledik
e-mail: jerhart@stanford.edu
Katerina Blazek
e-mail: kblazek@stanford.edu
Stanford University,
Durand Building 061,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Department of Mechanical Engineering
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 061,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Center for Tissue Regeneration,
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207
Thomas P. Andriacchi
Department of Mechanical Engineering
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308;
Center for Tissue Regeneration,
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207;
Repair, and Restoration,
Veterans Administration Hospital,
3801 Miranda Avenue,
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207;
Department of Orthopedic Surgery
,Stanford University,
Durand Building 227,
496 Lomita Mall,
Stanford, CA 94305-4308,
e-mail: tandriac@stanford.edu
Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Manuscript received December 7, 2012; final manuscript received May 16, 2013; accepted manuscript posted May 22, 2013; published online September 13, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Tammy Haut Donahue.
J Biomech Eng. Oct 2013, 135(10): 101002 (10 pages)
Published Online: September 13, 2013
Article history
Received:
December 7, 2012
Revision Received:
May 16, 2013
Accepted:
May 22, 2013
Citation
Favre, J., Scanlan, S. F., Erhart-Hledik, J. C., Blazek, K., and Andriacchi, T. P. (September 13, 2013). "Patterns of Femoral Cartilage Thickness are Different in Asymptomatic and Osteoarthritic Knees and Can be Used to Detect Disease-Related Differences Between Samples." ASME. J Biomech Eng. October 2013; 135(10): 101002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024629
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
In Memoriam: Shmuel Einav, 1942–2022
J Biomech Eng (August 2022)
A Review of Head Injury Metrics Used in Automotive Safety and Sports Protective Equipment
J Biomech Eng (November 2022)
Related Articles
Validation of Cartilage Thickness Calculations Using Indentation Analysis
J Biomech Eng (April,2010)
Comparison of MRI-Based Estimates of Articular Cartilage Contact Area in the Tibiofemoral Joint
J Biomech Eng (January,2011)
Accuracy of 3D Cartilage Models Generated From MR Images Is Dependent on Cartilage Thickness: Laser Scanner Based Validation of In Vivo Cartilage
J Biomech Eng (December,2009)
Modeling and Simulation of an Assistive Exoskeleton Leg System With Knee Osteoarthritis and Quadriceps Weakness
ASME J of Medical Diagnostics (February,2022)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Using Statistical Learning Theory to Improve Treatment Response for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 20
Experimental Studies
Nanoparticles and Brain Tumor Treatment
Automatic Brain MRI Tumor Isolation in MRI Images Using Morphological Erosion Technique
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 20