0
Research Papers

Parameter Extraction of Solar Cell Models Using the Lightning Search Algorithm in Different Weather Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Reza Sirjani

Assistant Professor
Faculty of Engineering,
Cyprus International University,
Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Mersin 10, 99258,
Turkey
e-mail: rsirjani@ciu.edu.tr

Hussain Shareef

Department of Electrical Engineering,
United Arab Emirates University,
P.O. Box 15551,
Al-Ain, UAE
e-mail: shareef@uaeu.ac.ae

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received November 30, 2015; final manuscript received March 23, 2016; published online May 5, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Geoffrey T. Klise.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(4), 041007 (May 05, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1406; doi: 10.1115/1.4033333 History: Received November 30, 2015; Revised March 23, 2016

Recently, accurate modeling of the differences between the current and voltage (I–V) characteristics of solar cells has been the main focus of many research studies. Mostly the results were obtained only for single diode or double diode solar cells, not for both or even for photovoltaic (PV) modules. Moreover, the effect of different shading conditions and different temperatures should be considered; otherwise, the obtained results would be reliable for specific weather conditions and unreliable for all real conditions. In this study, a novel nature-inspired optimization method known as the lightning search algorithm (LSA) was developed to extract the parameters of single diode and double diode solar cells as well as for a PV module. LSA is formulated based on lightning, which originates from thunderstorms. Experimental data from multicrystalline KC200GT solar panels were used to test the single diode and double diode solar panel models, and experimental data from the monocrystalline SQ150-PC solar panels were used to test the PV module model. The experimental data are first collected at the same temperature at five different irradiance levels. In the second stage, variations in temperature are considered at the same irradiance level. The extraction results in the LSA I–V curves accurately fit the entire range of the experimental data, while many fluctuations were seen in the particle swarm optimization (PSO) and bee colony optimization (BCO) I–V curves. The convergence characteristics of LSA were also evaluated in terms of accuracy and speed. For all cases, when LSA was used, the accuracies matched well with the entire range of experimental data. In addition, the value of the objective function using LSA was lower, and that method converged much faster than PSO and BCO.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Subudhi, B. , and Pradhan, R. , 2011, “ Characteristics Evaluation and Parameter Extraction of a Solar Array Based on Experimental Analysis,” IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive System (PEDS), Singapore, Dec. 5–8, pp. 340–344.
AlRashidi, M. R. , El-Naggar, K. M. , and AlHajri, M. F. , 2014, “ Extraction of Photovoltaic Characteristics Using Simulated Annealing,” 2nd International Conference on Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics (ICAESAM′ 2014), Istanbul, Turkey, May 4–5, pp. 77–79.
Tamrakar, R. , and Gupta, A. , 2015, “ A Review: Extraction of Solar Cell Modelling Parameters,” Int. J. Innovative Res. Electr., Electron., Instrum. Control Eng., 3(1), pp. 55–60. [CrossRef]
Lingyun, X. , Lefei, S. , Wei, H. , and Cong, J. , 2011, “ Solar Cells Parameter Extraction Using a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm,” Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), Shanghai, Jan. 6–7, pp. 306–309.
Zagrouba, M. , Sellami, A. , Bouaicha, M. , and Ksouri, M. , 2010, “ Identification of PV Solar Cells and Modules Parameters Using the Genetic Algorithms: Application to Maximum Power Extraction,” Sol. Energy, 48(5), pp. 860–866. [CrossRef]
Askarzadeh, A. , and Rezazadeh, A. , 2012, “ Parameter Identification for Solar Cell Models Using Harmony Search-Based Algorithms,” Sol. Energy, 86(11), pp. 3241–3249. [CrossRef]
Qin, H. , and Kimball, J. W. , 2011, “ Parameter Determination of Photovoltaic Cells From Field Testing Data Using Particle Swarm Optimization,” IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), Champaign, IL, Feb. 25–26.
Ye, M. , Wang, X. , and Xu, Y. , 2009, “ Parameter Extraction of Solar Cells Using Particle Swarm Optimization,” J. Appl. Phys., 105(9), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Saravanan, C. , and Panneerselvam, M. A. , 2013, “ A Comprehensive Analysis for Extracting Single Diode PV Model Parameters by Hybrid GA-PSO Algorithm,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., 78(8), pp. 16–19.
Huang, W. , Jiang, C. , Xue, L. , and Song, D. , 2011, “ Extracting Solar Cell Model Parameters Based on Chaos Particle Swarm Algorithm,” International Conference on Electric Information and Control Engineering (ICEICE), Wuhan, China, Apr. 15–17, pp. 398–402.
Oliva, D. , Cuevas, E. , and Pajares, G. , 2014, “ Parameter Identification of Solar Cells Using Artificial Bee Colony Optimization,” Energy, 72, pp. 93–102. [CrossRef]
Ketkar, M. , and Chopde, M. , 2014, “ Efficient Parameter Extraction of Solar Cell Using Modified ABC,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., 102(1), pp. 1–6.
Ma, J. , Ting, T. O. , Man, K. L. , Zhang, N. , Guan, S. U. , and Wong, P. W. , 2013, “ Parameter Estimation of Photovoltaic Models Via Cuckoo Search,” J. Appl. Math., 2013, p. 362619.
Jovanovic, R. , 2013, “ Optimization of Splits Spectrum and Multi-Junction Photovoltaic Cells Using Cuckoo Search Inspired Hybridization of The Nelder-Mead Simplex Algorithm,” Qatar Foundation Annual Research Conference (ARC '14), Doha, Qatar, Nov. 18–19.
Biswas, A. , Das, S. , Abraham, A. , and Dasgupta, S. , 2010, “ Analysis of the Reproduction Operator in an Artificial Bacterial Foraging System,” Appl. Math. Comput., 215(9), pp. 3343–3355.
Han, W. , Wang, H. H. , and Chen, L. , 2014, “ Parameters Identification for Photovoltaic Module Based on an Improved Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm,” Sci. World J., 2014, p. 859239.
Shareef, H. , Ibrahim, A. A. , and Mutlag, A. H. , 2015, “ Lightning Search Algorithm,” Appl. Soft Comput., 36, pp. 315–333. [CrossRef]
Shareef, H. , Mutlag, A. H. , and Mohamed, A. , 2015, “ A Novel Approach for Fuzzy Logic PV Inverter Controller Optimization Using Lightning Search Algorithm,” Neurocomputing, 168, pp. 435–453. [CrossRef]
Abd Ali, J. , Hannan, M. A. , and Mohamed, A. , 2015, “ A Novel Quantum Behaved Lightning Search Algorithm Approach to Improve the Fuzzy Logic Speed Controller for an Induction Motor Drive,” Energies, 8(12), pp. 13112–13136. [CrossRef]
Abd Ali, J. , Hannan, M. A. , Mohamed, A. , and Abdolrasol, M. G. M. , 2016, “ Fuzzy Logic Speed Controller Optimization Approach for Induction Motor Drive Using Backtracking Search Algorithm,” Measurement, 78, pp. 49–62. [CrossRef]
Appelbaum, J. , and Peled, A. , 2014, “ Parameters Extraction of Solar Cells—A Comparative Examination of Three Methods,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 122, pp. 64–173. [CrossRef]
Yuan, X. , Xiang, Y. , and He, Y. , 2014, “ Parameter Extraction of Solar Cell Models Using Mutative-Scale Parallel Chaos Optimization Algorithm,” Sol. Energy, 108, pp. 238–251. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The PV module model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Double diode model for solar cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Single diode model for solar cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The proposed LSA procedure for parameter extraction of solar cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the I–V curves at different irradiance levels in the single diode model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the I–V curves at different irradiance levels in the double diode model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the I–V curves at irradiance level of 985 W/m2 and T = 33 °C in the double diode model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the I–V curves at different temperatures in the PV module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The parameter extraction convergence characteristics of the different optimization techniques in the PV module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the I–V curves at different temperatures in the double diode model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the I–V curves at different temperatures in the single diode model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The parameter extraction convergence characteristics of the different optimization techniques in a double diode model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of the I–V curves at different irradiance levels in the PV module

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In