Research Papers

Is Architectural Pedagogy Prepared for Buildings of the Future?

[+] Author and Article Information
Timothy L. Hemsath

Associate Professor
College of Architecture,
University of Nebraska–Lincoln,
245 Arch Hall,
Lincoln, NE 68588
e-mail: Themsath3@unl.edu

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received April 30, 2016; final manuscript received October 10, 2016; published online November 10, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Patrick E. Phelan.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 139(1), 011003 (Nov 10, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1198; doi: 10.1115/1.4034981 History: Received April 30, 2016; Revised October 10, 2016

Assuming that buildings in our near future can achieve carbon neutrality, what next? More importantly, what is necessary in the short term to transform the way we design and think about buildings to achieve carbon neutrality and beyond? Can architectural pedagogy deal with how buildings integrate with the larger community and ecosystem around them, how buildings are constructed and/or manufactured to optimize resource use, and how they adapt to changes and are repurposed to meet future needs? Pedagogy for this future is about instilling a way of thinking about environmental design that is both conscious of and active in energy and carbon emissions, but also the health, wellbeing, and productivity of building occupants. Expounding on these questions, this paper will analyze current architectural curriculum and recent student design competitions against the U.S. Department of Energy’s Future of Buildings initiative. The discussion of the gap analysis results shows a deficiency about thinking about architectural design for the future. The paper will highlight where our design education succeeds and falls short toward preparing students. Additionally, thinking about this future context will highlight beneficial and detrimental aspects of the current pedagogical landscape to further whole-building design concepts to achieve a carbon neutral future for the built environment.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Structures , Design , Students
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wang, N. , Phelan, P. , Gonzalez, J. , Harris, C. , Henze, G. , Hutchinson, R. , Langevin, J. , Lazarus, M. A. , Nelson, B. , Pyke, C. , Roth, K. , Rouse, D. , Sawyer, K. , and Selkowitz, S. , 2014, “ A Vision for Future Buildings Beyond Zero Energy and Carbon Neutrality,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
Building Technologies Office, 2014, “ Buildings of the Future Scoping Study,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
Building Technologies Office, 2015, “ Future of Buildings Fact Sheet,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
Boyer, E. L. , and Mitgang, L. D. , 1996, Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
Schön, D. A. , 1983, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.
Schön, D. A. , 1985, The Design Studio: An Exploration of Its Traditions and Potentials, RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Trust, London.
Ochsner, J. K. , 2000, “ Behind the Mask: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Interaction in the Design Studio,” J. Archit. Educ., 53(4), pp. 194–206. [CrossRef]
Ramadi, E. , Ramadi, S. , and Nasr, K. , 2016, “ Engineering Graduates’ Skill Sets in the MENA Region: A Gap Analysis of Industry Expectations and Satisfaction,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 41(1), pp. 34–52. [CrossRef]
Mineraud, J. , Mazhelis, O. , Su, X. , and Tarkoma, S. , 2016, “ A Gap Analysis of Internet-of-Things Platforms,” Comp. Commun., 89–90, pp. 5–16. [CrossRef]
Wang, N. , 2015, “ Future of Buildings Concluding Workshop: Draft Vision (July 29),” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
Ryan, G. , and Bernard, H. R. , 2003, “ Techniques to Identify Themes,” Field Methods, 15(1), pp. 85–109. [CrossRef]
Steward, C. , and Kuska, S. , 2011, Sustainometrics, Greenway Communications, Norcross, GA.
Guy, S. , and Farmer, G. , 2001, “ Reinterpreting Sustainable Architecture: The Place of Technology,” J. Archit. Educ., 54(3), pp. 140–148. [CrossRef]
Khan, A. Z. , Vandevyvere, H. , and Allacker, K. , 2013, “ Design for the Ecological Age: Rethinking the Role of Sustainability in Architectural Education,” J. Archit. Educ., 67(2), pp. 175–185. [CrossRef]
NAAB, 2009, “ NAAB Conditions for Accreditation,” National Architectural Accrediting Board, Washington, DC.
Design Futures Council, 2016, “ America’s Best Architecture & Design Schools 2016,” Design Intelligence, Norcross, GA, accessed Apr. 30, 2016, http://www.di.net/articles/americas-best-architecture-schools-2016/
AIACC, 2016, “ Architecture at Zero,” American Institute of Architects, California Council, Sacramento, CA, accessed Apr. 30, 2016, http://www.architectureatzero.com/
Hammer and Hand, 2016, “ perFORM 2016 Competition,” Hammer and Hand, Portland, OR, accessed Apr. 30, 2016, http://hammerandhand.com/perform/design-competition/
ACSA, 2015, “ 2015–2016 AIA COTE Top Ten for Students,” Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Washington, DC, accessed Apr. 30, 2016, http://www.acsa-arch.org/programs-events/competitions/2015-2016-cote-top-ten-for-students/2015-2016-cote-top-ten-for-students-winners
Muhr, T. , 1991, “ ATLAS/ti—A Prototype for the Support of Text Interpretation,” Qual. Sociol., 14(4), pp. 349–371. [CrossRef]
Zaretsky, M. , 2010, Precedents in Zero-Energy Design: Architecture and Passive Design in the 2007 Solar Decathlon, Routledge, New York.
Jarzombek, M. , 2009, “ Architecture: A Failed Discipline,” Architecture of Hope, Vol. 19, Stichting Archis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 42–46.
Neveu, M. , 2009, “ Studia | Studio,” ACSA Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, Mar. 26–29, pp. 21–26.
Gamble, M. E. , Dagenhart, R. , and Jarrett, C. , 2002, “ Rethinking Studio Pedagogy: Teaching Introductory Architectural Design at the Graduate Level,” 18th National Conference on the Beginning Design Student, Portland, OR, Mar. 14–16, Paper No. 30.
PSU, 2016, “ Center for Urban Studies,” Portland State University, Portland, OR, accessed Apr. 30, 2016, https://www.pdx.edu/cus/
Whitehead, R. , Paxson, L. , and Rogers, C. A. , 2010, “ Places, Spaces, and Faces: Teaching Sustainable Design Through Cross-Disciplinary Studio Integration,” ACSA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Mar. 4–7, Paper No. 15.
CSBR, 2016, “ College of Design, Center for Sustainable Building Research,” The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, accessed Apr. 30, 2016, http://www.csbr.umn.edu/


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mapping of 2014 NAAB and design competition criteria to FoB characteristics. Median value (2) noted with a gray dashed line.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In