Technical Brief

Validation of a Simulation Model for Analysis of Shading Effects on Photovoltaic Panels

[+] Author and Article Information
Samuel K. Nashih, Carlos A. F. Fernandes

Instituto de Telecomunicações,
Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal

João Paulo N. Torres

Instituto de Telecomunicações,
Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal
e-mail: joaotorres@tecnico.ulisboa.pt

João Gomes

Department of Building,
Energy and Environmental Engineering,
University of Gävle,
Gävle 801 76, Sweden

P. J. Costa Branco

Instituto Superior Técnico,
Universidade de Lisboa,
Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received November 25, 2015; final manuscript received May 12, 2016; published online June 14, 2016. Assoc. Editor: M. Keith Sharp.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(4), 044503 (Jun 14, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1399; doi: 10.1115/1.4033646 History: Received November 25, 2015; Revised May 12, 2016

Numerical simulation results and modeling on the electrical features of concentrating photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) using the free circuit simulation package from linear technology corporation (LTSPICE) are presented. The effects of partial shading of cell strings and temperature are analyzed, showing very good agreement with the results obtained experimentally in lab, at Lisbon University, and under outdoor testing using similar receivers, at the SME Solarus Sunpower AB, a Swedish company whose mission is the development, production, and marketing of concentrated solar technology to the world market. The potential of the used methodology for the design of the solar cell configuration is emphasized as an important tool to optimize PV and PVT performances in the energy conversion process.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Luque, A. , Sala, G. , and Arboiro, J. C. , 1998, “ Electrical and Thermal Model for Non-Uniformly Illuminated Concentration Cells,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 51, pp. 269–290. [CrossRef]
Gow, J. A. , and Manning, C. D. , 1999, “ Development of a Photovoltaic Array Model for Use in Power-Electronics Simulation Studies,” IEE Proc.-Electr. Power Appl., 146(2), pp. 193–200. [CrossRef]
Chow, T. T. , 2003, “ Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic-Thermal Collector by Explicit Dynamic Model,” Sol. Energy, 75(2), pp. 143–152. [CrossRef]
Ortiz-Rivera, E. I. , and Peng, F. Z. , 2005, “ Analytical Model for a Photovoltaic Module Using the Electrical Characteristics Provided by the Manufacturer Data Sheet,” IEEE 36th Power Electronics Conference PESC, Recife, Brazil, June 16, pp. 2087–2091.
Alsayid, B. , and Jallad, J. , 2011, “ Modeling and Simulation of Photovoltaic Cells Module Arrays,” Int. J. Res. Rev. Comput. Sci., 2(6), pp. 1327–1331.
Acakpovi, A. , and Hagan, E. B. , 2013, “ Novel Photovoltaic Module Modeling Using matlab/simulink,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., 83(16), pp. 27–32.
Cubas, J. , Pindado, S. , and de Manuel, C. , 2014, “ Explicit Expressions for Solar Panel Equivalent Circuit Parameters Based on Analytical Formulation and the Lambert W-Function,” 1st International e-Conference on Energies “Whither Energy Conversion? Present Trends, Current Problems and Realistic Future Solutions.”
Silvestre, S. , Boronat, A. , and Shouder, A. , 2009, “ Study of Bypass Diodes Configuration on PV Modules,” Appl. Energy, 86(9), pp. 1632–1640. [CrossRef]
Azzouzi, M. , 2014, “ Modelling and Simulation of a Photovoltaic Cell Considering Single-Diode Model,” 8th International EDEB'14, Lisbon, Portugal, B. Lepadatescu, P. Borne, and F. Batzics, eds., pp. 175–182.
Tsai, H. L. , 2015, “ Modeling and Validation of Refrigerant-Based PVT-Assisted Heat Pump Water Heating (PVTA–HPWH) System,” Sol. Energy, 122, pp. 36–47. [CrossRef]
Eke, R. , and Demircan, C. , 2015, “ Shading Effect on the Energy Rating of Two Identical PV Systems on a Building Façade,” Sol. Energy, 122, pp. 48–57. [CrossRef]
Huang, J. C. , Su, Y. L. , Kuo, K. C. , Shieh, J. C. , and Jiang, J. A. , 2015, “ Towards Multiple Maximum Power Point Estimation of Photovoltaic Systems of Based on Semiconductor Theory,” Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl., 23(7), pp. 847–861. [CrossRef]
Deshkar, S. N. , Dhale, S. B. , Mukherjee, J. S. , Babu, T. S. , and Rajasekar, N. , 2015, “ Solar PV Array Reconfiguration Under Partial Shading Conditions for Maximum Power Extraction Using Genetic Algorithm,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 43, pp. 102–110. [CrossRef]
Bai, J. , Cao, Y. , Hao, Y. , Zhang, Z. , Liu, S. , and Cao, F. , 2015, “ Characteristic Output of PV Systems Under Partial Shading or Mismatch Conditions,” Sol. Energy, 112, pp. 41–54. [CrossRef]
Vargas, J. P. , Goss, B. , and Gottschalg, R. , 2015, “ Large Scale PV Systems Under Non-Uniform and Fault Conditions,” Sol. Energy, 116, pp. 303–313. [CrossRef]
Lua, F. , Guoa, S. , Walsha, T. M. , and Aberlea, A. G. , 2012, “ Improved PV Module Performance Under Partial Shading Conditions,” Energy Procedia, 33, pp. 248–255. [CrossRef]
Hanitsch, R. E. , Schulz, D. , and Siegfried, U. , 2001, “ Shading Effects on Output Power of Grid Connected Photovoltaic Generator Systems,” Rev. Energy Renewable: Power Eng., 2001, pp. 93–99.
Pareek, S. , and Dahiya, R. , 2015, “ Simulation and Performance Analysis of Individual Module to Address Partial Shading CUM Parameter Variation in Large Photovoltaic Fields,” J. Energy Power Sources, 2(3), pp. 99–104.
Gomes, J. , Diwanb, L. , Bernardo, R. , and Karlsson, B. , 2013, “ Minimizing the Impact of Shading at Oblique Solar Angles in a Fully Enclosed Asymmetric Concentrating PVT Collector,” Energy Procedia, 57, pp. 2176–2185.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Module formed by two groups of solar cells associated in series

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Stationary characteristic I(V,G) of a photodiode under illumination

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Single-diode model of a solar cell: (a) ideal solar cell model and (b) real solar cell model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) View of Solarus PVT collector and (b) picture of a receiver and the test setup table, including the IV tracer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Solarus 4-15-15-4 test receiver

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Circuit assembly in lab at Lisbon University

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

I(V) and P(V) experimental circuit results (dashed lines) and simulation results (solid lines): 25 °C (case A for power and case C for current) and 40 °C (case B for power and case D for current) for the configuration 20-20-20-20

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

I(V) and P(V) experimental circuit results (dashed lines) and simulation results (solid lines): 25 °C (case A for power and case C for current) and 40 °C (case B for power and case D for current) for the configuration 5-20-20-20

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

I(V) and P(V) experimental circuit results (dashed lines) and simulation results (solid lines): 25 °C (case A for power and case C for current) and 40 °C (case B for power and case D for current) for 20-5-20-20



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In