0
Journal of Solar Energy Engineering | Volume 138 | Issue 4 | Review Article
Review Article

External Costs of Energy: How Much Is Clean Energy Worth?

[+] Author and Article Information
Ari Rabl

Ecole des Mines,
Paris 75006, France
e-mail: ari.rabl@gmail.com

Joseph V. Spadaro

Basque Center for Climate Change,
Bilbao 48007, Spain
e-mail: Joseph.Spadaro@aol.com

1Here, we use the term damage cost rather than external cost, to avoid possible ambiguities about the extent to which a damage cost is already internalized.

2We cite the methodology and results of the NEEDS (2004–2008) and CASES (2006–2008) phases of ExternE. For the emissions data per kWh of electricity, we use the numbers of the data CD that is included in Ref. [12]. They can also be downloaded from http://www.feem-project.net/cases/ (although in the latter, some numbers have changed since the data CD in the book).

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received February 26, 2016; final manuscript received March 24, 2016; published online May 25, 2016. Editor: Robert F. Boehm.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(4), 040801 (May 25, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1096; doi: 10.1115/1.4033596 History: Received February 26, 2016; Revised March 24, 2016
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

This review describes the methodology for the analysis of environmental damages and presents key results obtained by the external costs of energy (ExternE) projects of the European Commission as well as analogous work in the U.S. The classical air pollutants (PM, NOx, SO2, and O3) due to the combustion of fossil fuels cause significant damage costs. The costs of global warming from the emission of greenhouse gases are also large. We show results for the damage cost per kilogram of emitted pollutant for typical conditions in Europe; they are based on the last version of ExternE (published in 2008), but with a major upward adjustment of the monetary values. We also show results that have been published in the U.S. Combined with the emissions data per kilowatt hour, they yield the damage costs of electric power. For the choice between different power technologies, one should take into account not only the emissions from the power plant but also from the entire fuel chain, using life cycle assessment (LCA) inventories. The damage costs of fossil fuels are much higher than most renewable energy sources. The results provide crucial input for the formulation of rational environmental policies, for example, the appropriate level of pollution taxes and the promotion of cleaner technologies.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 1: Summary,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 16520.
2
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 2: Methodology,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 16521.
3
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 3: Coal and Lignite,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 16522.
4
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 4: Oil and Gas,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 16523.
5
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 5: Nuclear,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 16524.
6
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 6: Wind and Hydro Fuel Cycles,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 16525.
7
EUR, 1995, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 7: Methodology 1998 Update,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 19083.
8
EUR, 1998, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 8: Global Warming,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 18836.
9
EUR, 1998, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 9: Fuel Cycles for Emerging and End-Use Technologies, Transport and Waste,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 18887.
10
EUR, 1998, “ ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Vol. 10: National Implementation,” European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development, Luxembourg, EUR No. 18528.
11
Bickel, P. , and Friedrich, R. , eds., 2005, ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Sustainable Energy Systems, Luxembourg.
12
Markandya, A., Bigano, A., and Porchia, R. R., 2010, The Social Cost of Electricity: Scenarios and Policy Implications, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, available at http://www.feem-project.net/cases/
13
Lee, R. , ed., 1994, External Costs and Benefits of Fuel Cycles, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
14
Rowe, R. D. , Lang, C. M. , Chestnut, L. G. , Latimer, D. , Rae, D. , Bernow, S. M. , and White, D. , 1995, The New York Electricity Externality Study, Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry, NY.
15
Abt, 2004, “ Power Plant Emissions: Particulate Matter-Related Health Damages and the Benefits of Alternative Emission Reduction Scenarios,” Abt Associates, Bethesda, MD.
16
NRC, 2010, “ Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use,” National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
17
Pope, C. A. , Burnett, R. T. , Thun, M. J. , Calle, E. E. , Krewski, D. , Ito, K. , and Thurston, G. D. , 2002, “ Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution,” J. Am. Med. Assoc., 287(9), pp. 1132–1141. [CrossRef]
18
IPCC, 2015, “ Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report,” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, accessed Oct. 4, 2015, http://ar5-syr.ipcc.ch/ipcc/ipcc/resources/pdf/IPCC_SynthesisReport.pdf
19
Tol, R. S. J. , 2005, “ The Marginal Damage Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment of the Uncertainties,” Energy Policy, 33(16), pp. 2064–2074. [CrossRef]
20
Stern, N. , 2006, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21
Nordhaus, W. , 2008, A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
22
Anthoff, D. , Steven, R. , Tol, R. S. J. , and Waldhoff, S. , 2011, “ The Time Evolution of the Social Cost of Carbon: An Application of Fund,” Economics, 2011, p. 2011-44.
23
Hope, C. W. , 2011, “ The Social Cost of CO2 From the PAGE09 Model,” Economics, 2011, p. 2011-39.
24
OECD, 2011, “ Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions in Regulatory Analysis of Environmental, Health and Transport Policies: Policy Implications,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, accessed Mar. 17, 2015, http://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/48279549.pdf
25
OECD, 2016, “ Mortality Risk Valuation in Environment, Health and Transport Policies,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, http://www.oecd.org/environment/mortalityriskvaluationinenvironmenthealthandtransportpolicies.htm
26
Spadaro, J. V. , and Rabl, A. , 2008, “ Estimating the Uncertainty of Damage Costs of Pollution: A Simple Transparent Method and Typical Results,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 28(2), pp. 166–183. [CrossRef]
27
Frischknecht, R. , Jungbluth, N. , Althaus, H.-J. , Doka, G. , Dones, R. , Hischier, R. , Hellweg, S. , Nemecek, T. , Rebitzer, G. , and Spielmann, M. , 2007, “ Overview and Methodology,” Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland, Final Report ecoinvent data v2.0, No. 1.
28
Rabl, A. , and Rabl, V. A. , 2013, “ External Costs of Nuclear: Greater or Less Than the Alternatives?,” Energy Policy, 57, pp. 575–584. [CrossRef]
29
Ontario Hydro, 1993, “ Full Cost Accounting for Decision Making,” Ontario Hydro, Toronto, ON, Canada.
30
Rabl, A. , Spadaro, J. V. , and Holland, M. , 2014, How Much is Clean Air Worth: Calculating the Benefits of Pollution Control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31
Gagnon, L. , and van de Vate, J. F. , 1997, “ Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Hydropower: The State of Research in 1996,” Energy Policy, 25(1), pp. 7–13. [CrossRef]
32
Muller, N. , 2013, personal communication.
33
Rabl, A. , Spadaro, J. V. , and van der Zwaan, B. , 2005, “ Uncertainty of Pollution Damage Cost Estimates: To What Extent Does It Matter?,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 39(2), pp. 399–408. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical damage costs in €2013/kg of pollutant in the 27 member countries of the European Union (EU27), with atmospheric modeling and ERFs of ExternE [12], but updated with the monetary values of this paper. The scale is logarithmic, and the error bars show 68% confidence intervals. h = stack height.

+Typical damage costs in €2013/kg of pollutant in the 27 member countries of the European Union (EU27), with atmospheric modeling and ERFs of ExternE [12], but updated with the monetary values of this paper. The scale is logarithmic, and the error bars show 68% confidence intervals. h = stack height.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Typical damage costs in €2013/kg of pollutant in the 27 member countries of the European Union (EU27), with atmospheric modeling and ERFs of ExternE [12], but updated with the monetary values of this paper. The scale is logarithmic, and the error bars show 68% confidence intervals. h = stack height.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Selected results for the damage costs of power technologies vintage 2010 in the EU27, in €cent2013/kWh. For the second version of nuclear, the estimate of Rabl and Rabl [28] for accident and waste has been added. For wind, the first version is for a combination wind + NGCC for base load, the second version is for wind with storage (but without damage costs of storage). Data of ExternE [12] updated with the monetary values of this paper.

+Selected results for the damage costs of power technologies vintage 2010 in the EU27, in €cent2013/kWh. For the second version of nuclear, the estimate of Rabl and Rabl [28] for accident and waste has been added. For wind, the first version is for a combination wind + NGCC for base load, the second version is for wind with storage (but without damage costs of storage). Data of ExternE [12] updated with the monetary values of this paper.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Selected results for the damage costs of power technologies vintage 2010 in the EU27, in €cent2013/kWh. For the second version of nuclear, the estimate of Rabl and Rabl [28] for accident and waste has been added. For wind, the first version is for a combination wind + NGCC for base load, the second version is for wind with storage (but without damage costs of storage). Data of ExternE [12] updated with the monetary values of this paper.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Breakdown of the damage costs of Fig. 2 by stages of fuel chain, in €cent2013/kWh. Data of ExternE [12], but updated with the monetary values of this paper.

+Breakdown of the damage costs of Fig. 2 by stages of fuel chain, in €cent2013/kWh. Data of ExternE [12], but updated with the monetary values of this paper.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Breakdown of the damage costs of Fig. 2 by stages of fuel chain, in €cent2013/kWh. Data of ExternE [12], but updated with the monetary values of this paper.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Results of NRC [16] for damage costs of electric power in the U.S., in ¢/kWh. For illustrative purposes, the study indicates climate damage with a hypothetical $30/tCO2eq.

+Results of NRC [16] for damage costs of electric power in the U.S., in ¢/kWh. For illustrative purposes, the study indicates climate damage with a hypothetical $30/tCO2eq.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Results of NRC [16] for damage costs of electric power in the U.S., in ¢/kWh. For illustrative purposes, the study indicates climate damage with a hypothetical $30/tCO2eq.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Emission Reduction Systems (Dust, SO2, NOX)
Clean and Efficient Coal-Fired Power Plants> Chapter 5
Numerical Modeling of NOx Emission in Turbulant Spray Flames Using Thermal and Fuel Models
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Estimating the Impact of Reduced Thrust Takeoff on NOx Emissions
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Reference Method Accuracy and Precision (ReMAP): Phase I
Reference Method Accuracy and Precision (ReMAP): Phase 1 (CRTD Vol. 60)
Pipeline Integrity and Security
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards> Chapter 11
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In