Effectively communicating designs to stakeholders or end users is a critical step in the design process yet can be a difficult challenge for engineers. Prototypes are unique tools that can enhance communication between these two groups, as prototypes are physical manifestations of the designer’s mental model. Previous work has demonstrated that novice designers often struggle to use prototypes as communication tools. We argue that it is critical that engineering students learn to fully leverage prototypes, and thus the current work sought to understand the relationship between argumentation, prototyping, and design decisions. In order to understand the communication patterns of novice designers during a prototyping task, a controlled study was conducted with a total of 46 undergraduate engineering students. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative data point to the intricate linkages between how students make material decisions and how they justify those decisions.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 26–29, 2018
Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division
- Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5184-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
“Thus, I Had to Go With What I Had”: A Multiple Methods Exploration of Novice Designers’ Articulation of Prototyping Decisions
Jessica Menold,
Jessica Menold
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Catherine Berdanier,
Catherine Berdanier
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher McComb,
Christopher McComb
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Emma Hocker,
Emma Hocker
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Lisa Gardner
Lisa Gardner
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jessica Menold
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Catherine Berdanier
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Christopher McComb
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Emma Hocker
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Lisa Gardner
Penn State University, University Park, PA
Paper No:
DETC2018-85800, V007T06A047; 12 pages
Published Online:
November 2, 2018
Citation
Menold, J, Berdanier, C, McComb, C, Hocker, E, & Gardner, L. "“Thus, I Had to Go With What I Had”: A Multiple Methods Exploration of Novice Designers’ Articulation of Prototyping Decisions." Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 7: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. August 26–29, 2018. V007T06A047. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85800
Download citation file:
92
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Study to Understand Perceptual Discrepancies Using Visual Illusions and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
J. Mech. Des (July,2007)
10 Innovative Institutes
Mechanical Engineering (May,2020)
International Trends in Engineering Design Education—A Partial View
J. Mech. Des (October,1979)
Related Chapters
Performance Ranking 101
Managing Systems Development 101: A Guide to Designing Effective Commercial Products & Systems for Engineers & Their Bosses∕CEOs
Development of Electronic Learning Industrial Environment (eLIN) System for Requirement Engineering Education
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Introduction
Turbo/Supercharger Compressors and Turbines for Aircraft Propulsion in WWII: Theory, History and Practice—Guidance from the Past for Modern Engineers and Students