For engineered systems, one of the first decisions a designer must make is the architecture that will solve the established high level function. In most cases, this can be accomplished in a multitude of ways, with each original architecture having strengths and weaknesses. This paper explores how the architecture choice for a system impacts the ability to evolve and meet future needs. The lessons learned from this paper are extracted from a case study where three systems that perform the same task via different architectural solutions are considered. These systems are them compared to understand how well they adhere to, or violate, the Empirically-Derived Principles for Designing Products with Flexibility for Future Evolution introduced by Tilstra et al.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 6–9, 2017
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division
- Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5813-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Exploring Architecture Selection and System Evolvability
Samantha White,
Samantha White
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Samantha White
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Scott Ferguson
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Paper No:
DETC2017-68290, V02BT03A044; 16 pages
Published Online:
November 3, 2017
Citation
White, S, & Ferguson, S. "Exploring Architecture Selection and System Evolvability." Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2B: 43rd Design Automation Conference. Cleveland, Ohio, USA. August 6–9, 2017. V02BT03A044. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-68290
Download citation file:
27
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Problem Well Defined is Nearly Solved
J. Med. Devices (June,2010)
Evaluating End-of-Life Recovery Profit by a Simultaneous Consideration of Product Design and Recovery Network Design
J. Mech. Des (July,2010)
An Approach to Evaluate the Profitability of Component Commonality
J. Mech. Des (July,2017)
Related Chapters
We Don't Sell Air
Hot Air Rises and Heat Sinks: Everything You Know about Cooling Electronics Is Wrong
Multilevel Optimization for Enterprise-Driven Decision-Based Product Design
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Package-to-Board Interconnection
Essentials of Electronic Packaging: A Multidisciplinary Approach