Research Papers

Performance Assessment of a Heat Recovery System for Monolithic Receiver-Reactors

[+] Author and Article Information
Stefan Brendelberger, Philipp Holzemer-Zerhusen, Henrik von Storch, Christian Sattler

Institute of Solar Research,
German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Köln, 51147, Germany

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received September 7, 2018; final manuscript received October 31, 2018; published online January 8, 2019. Guest Editors: Tatsuya Kodama, Christian Sattler, Nathan Siegel, Ellen Stechel.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 141(2), 021008 (Jan 08, 2019) (9 pages) Paper No: SOL-18-1417; doi: 10.1115/1.4042241 History: Received September 07, 2018; Revised October 31, 2018

The most advanced solar thermochemical cycles in terms of demonstrated reactor efficiencies are based on temperature swing operated receiver-reactors with open porous ceria foams as a redox material. The demonstrated efficiencies are encouraging but especially for cycles based on ceria as the redox material, studies have pointed out the importance of high solid heat recovery rates to reach competitive process efficiencies. Different concepts for solid heat recovery have been proposed mainly for other types of reactors, and demonstration campaigns have shown first advances. Still, solid heat recovery remains an unsolved challenge. In this study, chances and limitations for solid heat recovery using a thermal storage unit with gas as heat transfer fluid are assessed. A numerical model for the reactor is presented and used to analyze the performance of a storage unit coupled to the reactor. The results show that such a concept could decrease the solar energy demand by up to 40% and should be further investigated.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Nakamura, T. , 1977, “ Hydrogen Production From Water Utilizing Solar Heat at High Temperatures,” Sol. Energy, 19(5), pp. 467–475. [CrossRef]
Abanades, S. , and Flamant, G. , 2006, “ Thermochemical Hydrogen Production From a Two-Step Solar-Driven Water-Splitting Cycle Based on Cerium Oxides,” Sol. Energy, 80(12), pp. 1611–1623. [CrossRef]
Muhich, C. L. , Blaser, S., Hoes, M.C., and Steinfeld, A., 2018, “ Comparing the Solar-to-Fuel Energy Conversion Efficiency of Ceria and Perovskite Based Thermochemical Redox Cycles for Splitting H2O and CO2,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43(41), pp. 18814–18831. [CrossRef]
Diver, R. B. , Miller, J. E., Allendorf, M. D., Siegel, N. P., and Hogan, R. E., 2008, “ Solar Thermochemical Water-Splitting Ferrite-Cycle Heat Engines,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 130(4), pp. 41001–41008. [CrossRef]
Diver, R. B. , Miller, J. E., Siegel, N. P., and Moss, T. A., 2010, “ Testing of a CR5 Solar Thermochemical Heat Engine Prototype,” ASME Paper No. ES2010-90093.
Falter, C. P. , Sizmann, A. , and Pitz-Paal, R. , 2015, “ Modular Reactor Model for the Solar Thermochemical Production of Syngas Incorporating Counter-Flow Solid Heat Exchange,” Sol. Energy, 122, pp. 1296–1308. [CrossRef]
Lapp, J. , Davidson, J. , and Lipiński, W. , 2012, “ Efficiency of Two-Step Solar Thermochemical Non-Stoichiometric Redox Cycles With Heat Recovery,” Energy, 37(1), pp. 591–600. [CrossRef]
Ermanoski, I. , Siegel, N. P. , and Stechel, E. B. , 2013, “ A New Reactor Concept for Efficient Solar-Thermochemical Fuel Production,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 135(3), p. 031002. [CrossRef]
Brendelberger, S. , Felinks, J., Roeb, M., and Sattler, C., 2014, “ Solid Phase Heat Recovery and Multi Chamber Reduction for Redox Cycles,” ASME Paper No. ES2014-6421.
Felinks, J. , Brendelberger, S., Roeb, M., Sattler, C., and Pitz-Paal, R., 2014, “ Heat Recovery Concept for Thermochemical Processes Using a Solid Heat Transfer Medium,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 73(1), pp. 1006–1013. [CrossRef]
Brendelberger, S. , and Sattler, C. , 2015, “ Concept Analysis of an Indirect Particle-Based Redox Process for Solar-Driven H2O/CO2 Splitting,” Sol. Energy, 113, pp. 158–170. [CrossRef]
Felinks, J. , Richter, S., Lachmann, B., Brendelberger, S., Roeb, M., Sattler, C., and Pitz-Paal, R., 2016, “ Particle–Particle Heat Transfer Coefficient in a Binary Packed Bed of Alumina and Zirconia-Ceria Particles,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 101, pp. 101–111. [CrossRef]
Felinks, J. , 2017, Heat Recovery From Particles Using Spherical Heat Transfer Media in Solar Thermochemical Cycles, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Yuan, C. , Jarrett, C., Chueh, W., Kawajiri, Y., and Henry, A., 2015, “ A New Solar Fuels Reactor Concept Based on a Liquid Metal Heat Transfer Fluid: Reactor Design and Efficiency Estimation,” Sol. Energy, 122, pp. 547–561. [CrossRef]
Hathaway, B. J. , Bala Chandran, R., Gladen, A. C., Chase, T. R., and Davidson, J. H., 2016, “ Demonstration of a Solar Reactor for Carbon Dioxide Splitting Via the Isothermal Ceria Redox Cycle and Practical Implications,” Energy Fuels, 30(8), pp. 6654–6661. [CrossRef]
Marxer, D. , Furler, P., Takacs, M., and Steinfeld, A., 2017, “ Solar Thermochemical Splitting of CO2 Into Separate Streams of CO and O2 With High Selectivity, Stability, Conversion, and Efficiency,” Energy Environ. Sci., 10(5), pp. 1142–1149. [CrossRef]
Säck, J. P. , Breuer, S., Cotelli, P., Houaijia, A., Lange, M., Wullenkord, M., Spenke, C., Roeb, M., and Sattler, C., 2016, “ High Temperature Hydrogen Production: Design of a 750 KW Demonstration Plant for a Two Step Thermochemical Cycle,” Sol. Energy, 135, pp. 232–241. [CrossRef]
Kyrimis, S. , Le Clercq, P. , and Brendelberger, S. , 2018, “ 3D Modelling of a Solar Thermochemical Reactor for MW Scaling-Up Studies,” SolarPACES, Casablanca, Morocco, Oct. 2–5, Paper No. 25746.
Haussener, S. , Jerjen, I., Wyss, P., and Steinfeld, A., 2012, “ Tomography-Based Determination of Effective Transport Properties for Reacting Porous Media,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(1), p. 012601.
Ackermann, S. , Takacs, M., Scheffe, J., and Steinfeld, A., 2017, “ Reticulated Porous Ceria Undergoing Thermochemical Reduction With High-Flux Irradiation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 107, pp. 439–449. [CrossRef]
Saito, M. B. , and de Lemos, M. J. S. , 2005, “ Interfacial Heat Transfer Coefficient for Non-Equilibrium Convective Transport in Porous Media,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 32(5), pp. 666–676. [CrossRef]
Warren, K. J. , Reim, J., Randhir, K., Greek, B., Carrillo, R., Hahn, D. W., and Scheffe, J. R., 2017, “ Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Solar Methane Reforming Through the Nonstoichiometric Ceria Redox Cycle,” Energy Technol., 5(11), pp. 2138–2149. [CrossRef]
Venstrom, L. J. , De Smith, R. M., Chandran, R. B., Boman, D. B., Krenzke, P. T., and Davidson, J. H., 2015, “ Applicability of an Equilibrium Model to Predict the Conversion of CO2 to CO Via the Reduction and Oxidation of a Fixed Bed of Cerium Dioxide,” Energy Fuels, 29(12), pp. 8168–8177. [CrossRef]
Marxer, D. , Furler, P., Scheffe, J., Geerlings, H., Falter, C., Batteiger, V., Sizmann, A., and Steinfeld, A., 2015, “ Demonstration of the Entire Production Chain to Renewable Kerosene Via Solar Thermochemical Splitting of H2O and CO2,” Energy Fuels, 29(5), pp. 3241–3250. [CrossRef]
Keene, D. J. , Davidson, J. H. , and Lipinski, W. , 2013, “ A Model of Transient Heat and Mass Transfer in a Heterogeneous Medium of Ceria Undergoing Nonstoichiometric Reduction,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 135(5), p. 052701.
Takacs, M. , Ackermann, S., Bonk, A., Neises‐von, M., Puttkamer, Haueter, Ph., Scheffe, J. R., Vogt, U. F., and Steinfeld, A., 2017, “ Splitting CO2 With a Ceria-Based Redox Cycle in a Solar-Driven Thermogravimetric Analyzer,” AIChE J., 63(4), pp. 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15501 [PubMed]
Part L1.2 Kast, W., and Nirschl, H., 2010, VDI Heat Atlas, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Comparison between (a) cut through realistic geometry with cylindrical symmetry and (b) simplified 1D model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Model validation—comparison of experimental (dotted) data and simulation (solid) results of the temperature evolution and the rate of O2 and CO production. Experimental data was extracted from Marxer et al. [16].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Temperature evolution: comparison of experimental results with front, mean and back temperature of RPC in simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematics of setup without (a) and with (b) storage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Stabilization of phase durations with increasing number of cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Changing durations of the preheating and cooling phases for a case where phase durations do not stabilize but rather fluctuate. These results were obtained with HCR = 5 and FRF = 1.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Heat recovery rate as function of the HCR after reaching a stable configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Heat recovery rate for storage units with different sizes as function of the iteration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evolution of RPC mean temperature for a case without storage and with storage. For the storage case, the different phases are indicated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Relative energy benefit for the coupled system with storage for different flow rates as a function of HCR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Relative energy benefit reduction as a function of the HTF flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of heat demand of the blower and the savings in required solar energy input during one cycle. Additionally the reference lines indicating the reduction enthalpies for reactors with 20% and 5% efficiencies.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In