Research Papers

Alternative Mooring Systems for a Very Large Offshore Wind Turbine Supported by a Semisubmersible Floating Platform

[+] Author and Article Information
Jinsong Liu

Department of Civil, Architectural
and Environmental Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: Jinsongliu@utexas.edu

Lance Manuel

Department of Civil, Architectural
and Environmental Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: lmanuel@mail.utexas.edu

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received June 14, 2017; final manuscript received March 31, 2018; published online May 7, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Douglas Cairns.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 140(5), 051003 (May 07, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: SOL-17-1231; doi: 10.1115/1.4039984 History: Received June 14, 2017; Revised March 31, 2018

As offshore wind turbines supported on floating platforms extend to deep waters, the various effects involved in the dynamics, especially those resulting from the influence of moorings, become significant when predicting the overall integrated system response. The combined influence of waves and wind affect motions of the structure and induce tensile forces in mooring lines. The investigation of the system response under misaligned wind-wave conditions and the selection of appropriate mooring systems to minimize the turbine, tower, and mooring system loads is the subject of this study. We estimate the 50-year return response of a semisubmersible platform supporting a 13.2 MW wind turbine as well as mooring line forces when the system is exposed to four different wave headings with various environmental conditions (wind speeds and wave heights). Three different mooring system patterns are presented that include 3 or 6 mooring lines with different interline angles. Performance comparisons of the integrated systems may be used to define an optimal system for the selected large wind turbine.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Jonkman, J. , Butterfield, S. , Musial, W. , and Scott, G. , 2009, “Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/38060.pdf
Stewart, G. , Lackner, M. , Robertson, A. , Jonkman, J. , and Goupee, A. , 2012, “Calibration and Validation of a FAST Floating Wind Turbine Model of the DeepCwind Scaled Tension-Leg Platform,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/EL-500-54822 (U.S.). https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54822.pdf
Jonkman, J. M. , and Musial, W. , 2010, “Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OC3) for IEA Task 23 Offshore Wind Technology and Deployment,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-5000-48191. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/48191.pdf
Vorpahl, F. , Popko, W. , and Kaufer, D. , 2011, “Description of a Basic Model of the ‘UpWind Reference Jacket’ for Code Comparison in the OC4 Project Under IEA Wind Annex XXX,” Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology, Bremerhaven, Germany, Technical Report. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabian_Vorpahl/publication/267233701_Description_of_a_basic_model_of_the_UpWind_reference_jacket_for_code_comparison_in_the_OC4_project_under_IEA_Wind_Annex_XXX/links/5465bf6d0cf2f5eb17ff560d/Description-of-a-basic-model-of-the-UpWind-reference-jacket-for-code-comparison-in-the-OC4-project-under-IEA-Wind-Annex-XXX.pdf
Jonkman, J. , Robertson, A. , Popko, W. , Vorpahl, F. , Zuga, A. , Kohlmeier, M. , Larsen, T. J. , Yde, A. , Saeterto, K. , Okstad, K. M. , Nichols, J. , Nygaard, T. A. , Gao, Z. , Manolas, D. , Kim, K. , Yu, Q. , Shi, W. , Park, H. , Vasquez-Rojas, A. , Dubois, J. , Kaufer, D. , Thomassen, P. , de Ruiter, M. J. , Peeringa, J. M. , Zhiwen, H. , and von Waaden, H. , 2012, “Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation (OC4), Phase I-Results of Coupled Simulations of an Offshore Wind Turbine With Jacket Support Structure,” The Twenty-Second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Rhodes, Greece, June 17–22, Paper No. NREL/CP-5000-54124. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54124.pdf
Griffith, D. T. , and Resor, B. R. , 2011, “Description of Model Data for SNL 13.2-00-Land: A 13.2 MW Land-Based Turbine Model With SNL 100-00 Blades,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Technical Report No. SAND2011-9310P. http://energy.sandia.gov/wp-content/gallery/uploads/SNL13.2-00-SAND2011-9310P.pdf
Liu, J. , Thomas, E. , Manuel, L. , Griffith, D. T. , Ruehl, K. M. , and Barone, M. , 2018, “Integrated System Design for a Large Wind Turbine Supported on a Moored Semi-Submersible Platform,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 6(1), p. 9. [CrossRef]
Thomas, E. , Liu, J. , Goyal, A. , and Manuel, L. , 2016, “Long-Term Loads on a Large Offshore Wind Turbine Supported by a Semi-Submersible Platform,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2016-1995.
Fischer, T. , Rainey, P. , Bossanyi, E. , and Kühn, M. , 2011, “Study on Control Concepts Suitable for Mitigation of Loads From Misaligned Wind and Waves on Offshore Wind Turbines Supported on Monopiles,” Wind Eng., 35(5), pp. 561–573. [CrossRef]
IEC, 2009, “Wind Turbines—Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. IEC 61400-3. https://collections.iec.ch/std/series/iec61400-3%7Bed1.0%7Den.nsf/doc.xsp?open&documentId=5A5C5AD96C9C1BD9C1257CCA0030D028
Philippe, M. , Babarit, A. , and Ferrant, P. , 2013, “Modes of Response of an Offshore Wind Turbine With Directional Wind and Waves,” Renewable Energy, 49, pp. 151–155. [CrossRef]
Ramachandran, G. K. , Bredmose, H. , Sørensen, J. N. , and Jensen, J. J. , 2014, “Fully Coupled Three-Dimensional Dynamic Response of a Tension-Leg Platform Floating Wind Turbine in Waves and Wind,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 136(2), p. 020901. [CrossRef]
Agarwal, P. , and Manuel, L. , 2008, “Extreme Loads for an Offshore Wind Turbine Using Statistical Extrapolation From Limited Field Data,” Wind Energy, 11(6), pp. 673–684. [CrossRef]
Ronold, K. , Wedel-Heinen, J. , and Christensen, C. J. , 1999, “Reliability-Based Fatigue Design of Wind-Turbine Rotor Blades,” Eng. Struct., 21(12), pp. 1101–1114. [CrossRef]
Manuel, L. , Veers, P. S. , and Winterstein, S. R. , 2001, “Parametric Models for Estimating Wind Turbine Fatigue Loads for Design,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 123(4), pp. 346–355. [CrossRef]
Lee, G. , Byon, E. , Ntaimo, L. , and Ding, Y. , 2013, “Bayesian Spline Method for Assessing Extreme Loads on Wind Turbines,” Ann. Appl. Stat., 7(4), pp. 2034–2061. [CrossRef]
Saranyasoontorn, K. , and Manuel, L. , 2004, “Efficient Models for Wind Turbine Extreme Loads Using Inverse Reliability,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 92(10), pp. 789–804. [CrossRef]
Winterstein, S. R. , and Engebretsen, K. , 1998, “Reliability-Based Prediction of Design Loads and Responses for Floating Ocean Structures,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July 5–6.
Rosenblatt, M. , 1952, “Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation,” Ann. Math. Stat., 23(3), pp. 470–472. [CrossRef]
Griffith, D. , 2013, “The SNL100-02 Blade: Advanced Core Material Design Studies for the Sandia 100-Meter Blade,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Technical Report No. SAND2013-10162. http://energy.sandia.gov/wp-content/gallery/uploads/dlm_uploads/1310162.pdf
Lee, C. , and Newman, J. , 2013, “WAMIT User Manual, Version 7.0,” WAMIT, Chestnut Hill, MA, Technical Report.
Masciola, M. , Jonkman, J. , and Robertson, A. , 2013, “Implementation of a Multisegmented, Quasi-Static Cable Model,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/CP-5000-57812. http://cim.mcgill.ca/~mmascio1/ISOPE2013-TPC-0646.pdf
Li, L. , Gao, Z. , and Moan, T. , 2013, “Joint Environmental Data at Five European Offshore Sites for Design of Combined Wind and Wave Energy Devices,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10156.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Three alternative mooring line configurations (diameter in meters)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Top view of wind-wave misalignment condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Integrated SNL semisubmersible wind turbine model: (a) three-dimensional (3D) View and (b) 2D View

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fifty-year return period tower base bending moments (left vertical axes, darker lines) and measures of uncertainty (right vertical axes, lighter lines) for different wind-wave misalignments and for different mooring systems: (a) SNL300, (b) SNL630, (c) SNL660, (d) SNL300, (e) SNL630, and (f) SNL660

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fifty-year ECs: (a) 3D EC and (b) 2D EC



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In