Research Papers

Structural Dynamics Analysis of Three-Dimensional Bi-Axial Sun-Tracking System Structure Determined by Numerical Modal Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Fateh Ferroudji

Unité de Recherche en Energies Renouvelables
en Milieu Saharien (URERMS),
Centre de Développement des Energies
Renouvelables (CDER),
Adrar 01000, Algeria
e-mail: fferroudji@yahoo.fr

Cherif Khelifi

Unité de Recherche en Energies Renouvelables
en Milieu Saharien (URERMS),
Centre de Développement des Energies
Renouvelables (CDER),
Adrar 01000, Algeria
e-mail: khelifiam@yahoo.fr

Toufik Outtas

Laboratoire de Mécanique des Structures et
Université Batna 2,
Batna 05000, Algeria
e-mail: tf_outtas@hotmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received July 18, 2016; final manuscript received December 14, 2017; published online February 27, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Werner J. Platzer.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 140(3), 031004 (Feb 27, 2018) (11 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1331; doi: 10.1115/1.4039272 History: Received July 18, 2016; Revised December 14, 2017

Sun-tracking system (STS) is a key factor for solar photovoltaic (PV) future and new answers for the solar market. It will expand large-scale PV projects (PV farms) worldwide, and it is possible to collect more energy from the sun. PV farms consist of thousands of STS that are subject to dynamic loads (wind, snow, etc.), vibrations, and gravitational loads. This paper presents the structural dynamic analysis of a 24 m2 bi-axial STS (azimuth-elevation) at different elevation angles based on its modal parameters (natural frequencies, modal shapes, and modal damping ratios) and dynamic performance indices (modal participation factors (MPF), forcing frequencies, and mechanical quality factors) by means of the finite element analysis (FEA). The simulation results show that the structural dynamic design of the STS meets the desired structural requirements and agrees well with structural dynamic standards (EN 1991-1-4 and ASHRAE). These results can be used for further analysis on optimal design and vibration safety verification for the bi-axial STS (PV applications).

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


BP, 2015, “Statistical Review of World Energy,” British Petroleum, London, accessed Feb. 20, 2018, http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview
Meliß, M. , 1997, Regenerative Energiequellen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. [CrossRef]
Yilmaz, S. , Ozcalik, H. R. , Kesler, S. , Dincer, F. , and Yelmen, B. , 2015, “ The Analysis of Different PV Power Systems for the Determination of Optimal PV Panels and System Installation-A Casestudy in Kahramanmaras, Turkey,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 52, pp. 1015–1024. [CrossRef]
Eke, R. , and Senturk, A. , 2012, “ Performance Comparison of a Double-Axis Sun Tracking versus Fixed PV System,” Sol. Energy, 86(9), pp. 2665–2672. [CrossRef]
Lin, C. K. , Dai, C. Y. , and Wu, J. C. , 2013, “ Analysis of Structural Deformation and Deformation-Induced Solar Radiation Misalignment in a Tracking Photovoltaic System,” Renewable Energy, 59, pp. 65–74. [CrossRef]
Luque, A. , and Hegedus, S. , 2011, Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Scaletchi, I. , Visa, I. , and Velicu, R. , 2010, “ Modeling Wind Action on Solar Tracking Platforms,” Bull. Transilvania, Univ. Brasov, 3(52), pp. 115–122.
Velicu, R. , Moldovean, G. , Scaleţchi, I. , and Butuc, B. R. , 2010, “ Wind Loads on an Azimuthal Photovoltaic Platform, Experimental Study,” International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ'10), Granada, Spain, Mar. 23–25, pp. 427–432.
Wang, S. , Sun, Y. , Wang, Q. , Wang, Q. , and Wei, M. , 2012, “ Limit Requirements Simulation of Sundial Solar Tracking Machine,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 25(2), pp. 306–314. [CrossRef]
Bitsuamlak, G. T. , Dagnew, A. K. , and Erwin, J. , 2010, “ Evaluation of Wind Loads on Solar Panel Modules Using CFD,” Fifth International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE), Chapel Hill, NC, May 23–27, pp. 1–8.
Shademan, M. , and Hangan, H. , 2009, “ Wind Loading on Solar Panels at Different Inclination Angles,” 11th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering, San Juan, PR, Jun 22–26, pp. 1–9.
Mihailidis, A. , Panagiotidis, K. , and Agouridas, K. , 2009, “ Analysis of Solar Panel Support Structures,” Third ANSA & μETA International Conference, Halkidiki, Greece, Sept. 9–11, pp. 1–11.
Hernández, S. , Mendez, J. , Nieto, F. , and Jurado, J. A. , 2009, “ Aerodynamic Analysis of a Photovoltaic Solar Tracker,” Fifth EACWE, Florence, Italy, July 19–23, pp. 1–10.
Velicu, R. , Lateş, M. , and Moldovean, G. , 2009, “ Loading Cases and Forces on Azimuthal Solar Tracking Systems With Linear Actuators,” Tenth IFToMM International Symposium on Science of Mechanisms and Machines (SYROM), Braşov, Romania, Oct. 12–15, pp. 723–733.
Kvasznicza, Z. , and Elmer, G, G. , 2006, “ Optimising Solar Tracking Systems for Solar Cells,” Fourth Serbian-Hungarian Joint Symposium on Intelligent Systems (SISY), Subotica, Serbia, Sept. 29–30, pp. 167–180.
Gil, A. M. , Acín, A. , Rueda, F. , and Mayor, I. , 2009, “ Structural and Motion System Dynamic Analysis of a Two-Axes Solar Tracker Under Wind Action,” SIMULIA Customer Conference, London, May 18–21, pp. 1–15.
Vasquez-Arango, J. F. , Buck, R. , and Pitz-Paal, R. , 2015, “ Dynamic Properties of a Heliostat Structure Determined by Numerical and Experimental Modal Analysis,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]
Griffith, D. T. , Moya, A. C. , Ho, C. K. , and Hunter, P. S. , 2014, “ Structural Dynamics Testing and Analysis for Design Evaluation and Monitoring of Heliostats,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(2), p. 021010. [CrossRef]
Gong, B. , Li, Z. , Wang, Z. , and Wang, Y. , 2012, “ Wind-Induced Dynamic Response of Heliostat,” Renewable Energy, 38(1), pp. 206–213. [CrossRef]
Ho, C. K. , Griffith, D. T. , Moya, A. C. , Sment, J. , Christian, J. , Yuan, J. , and Hunter, P. , 2011, “ Dynamic Testing and Analysis of Heliostats to Evaluate Impacts of Wind on Optical Performance and Structural Fatigue,” 18th Solar-PACES International Conference, Marrakech, Morocco, Sept. 11–14, p. 122695.
EN, 2004, “Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures, General Actions—Part 1–4: Wind Actions,” British Standards Institution, London, Standard No. EN 1991-1-4.
ASHRAE, 1999, ASHRAE Handbook, Sound and Vibration Control, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, Chap. 46.
Graham, K. S. , 2011, Advanced Vibration Analysis, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
Kurowski, P. M. , 2016, Vibration Analysis With SolidWorks Simulation 2016, SDC Publications, Mission, KS.
Mayes, R. L. , Schoenherr, T. F. , Blecke, J. , and Rohe, D. P. , 2014, “ Efficient Method of Measuring Effective Mass of a System,” Topics in Experimental Dynamic Substructuring (Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, Vol. 2), Springer, New York, pp. 313–320.
Priestley, M. J. N. , Seible, S. , and Calvi, G. M. , 1996, Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, Wiley, New York, pp. 184–242. [CrossRef]
López, O. A. , and Cruz, M. , 1996, “ Number of Modes for the Seismic Design of Building,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(8), pp. 837–855. [CrossRef]
Roger, A. , Messenger , and Jerry, V. , 2004, Photovoltaic System Engineering, 2nd ed., CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
Mecasolar, 2009, “Solar Tracker MS-2 Tracker 10 and 10+, Version 4.1,” Mecasolar, Navarra, Spain, accessed Feb. 20, 2018, http://www.academia.edu/23093165/Solar_Tracker_MS-2_TRACKER_10_and_10_USER_ASSEMBLY_AND_MAINTENANCE_MANUAL
Harris, C. M. , and Piersol, A. G. , 2009, Harris' Shock and Vibration Handbook, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Professional, New York.
Farouk-abdelal, G. , Nader, A. , and Ahmed, H. , 2008, “ Mechanical Fatigue and Spectrum Analysis of Small-Satellite Structure,” Int. J. Mech. Mater Des., 4(3), pp. 265–278. [CrossRef]
Girard, A. , and Roy, N. , 2008, Structural Dynamics in Industry, ISTE, Ltd/Wiley, London/Chichester, UK, pp. 71–77. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

solidworks model of PV power station and bi-axial STS: (a) PV power station is composed of four STSs isometric view at elevation angle of 50 deg, (b) STS isometric view at elevation angle of 50 deg, (c) side view at elevation angle of 50 deg, and (d) side view at elevation angle of 0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Mesh generation model of STS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The third mode of vibrations of the STS for six elevation angles: (a) first, (b) second, and (c) third mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

First 20th natural frequencies under six elevation angles of the STS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

First 20th MPFs in the X, Y, and Z directions versus frequency for the STS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Diagram of wind load action and (b) exterior excited frequencies of structure of the STS for different elevation angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Shapes and frequencies of modes have significant mass participation in the X-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Shapes and frequencies of modes have significant mass participation in the Y-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Shapes and frequencies of modes have significant mass participation in the Z-direction




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In