0
Research Papers

Integration of a Pressurized-Air Solar Receiver Array to a Gas Turbine Power Cycle for Solar Tower Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Peter Poživil

Department of Mechanical and
Process Engineering,
ETH Zürich,
Zürich 8092, Switzerland

Aldo Steinfeld

Department of Mechanical and
Process Engineering,
ETH Zürich,
Zürich 8092, Switzerland
e-mail: aldo.steinfeld@ethz.ch

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received August 16, 2016; final manuscript received April 23, 2017; published online May 22, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Werner J. Platzer.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 139(4), 041007 (May 22, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1369; doi: 10.1115/1.4036635 History: Received August 16, 2016; Revised April 23, 2017

The thermal performance of an array of pressurized-air solar receiver modules integrated to a gas turbine power cycle is analyzed for a simple Brayton cycle (BC), recuperated Brayton cycle (RC), and combined Brayton–Rankine cycle (CC). While the solar receiver's solar-to-heat efficiency decreases at higher operating temperatures and pressures, the opposite is true for the power cycle's heat-to-work efficiency. The optimal operating conditions are achieved with a preheat stage for a solar receiver outlet air temperature of 1300 °C and an air cycle pressure ratio of 9, yielding a peak solar-to-electricity efficiency—defined as the ratio of the net cycle work output divided by the solar radiative power input through the receiver's aperture—of 39.3% for the combined cycle configuration.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Romero, M. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2012, “ Concentrating Solar Thermal Power and Thermochemical Fuels,” Energy Environ. Sci., 5(11), pp. 9234–9245. [CrossRef]
Kehlhofer, R. , Hannemann, F. , Stirnimann, F. , and Rukes, B. , 2009, Combined-Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants, PennWell, Tulsa, OK.
Boyce, M. P. , 2012, Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook, Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, TX.
Dersch, J. , Geyer, M. , Herrmann, U. , Jones, S. A. , Kelly, B. , Kistner, R. , Ortmanns, W. , Pitz-Paal, R. , and Price, H. , 2004, “ Trough Integration Into Power Plants: A Study on the Performance and Economy of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 947–959. [CrossRef]
Romero, M. , Buck, R. , and Pacheco, J. E. , 2002, “ An Update on Solar Central Receiver Systems, Projects, and Technologies,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 98–108.
Kribus, A. , Zaibel, R. , Carey, D. , Segal, A. , and Karni, J. , 1998, “ A Solar-Driven Combined Cycle Power Plant,” Sol. Energy, 62(2), pp. 121–129. [CrossRef]
Hischier, I. , Hess, D. , Lipiński, W. , Modest, M. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2009, “ Heat Transfer Analysis of a Novel Pressurized Air Receiver for Concentrated Solar Power Via Combined Cycles,” ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., 1(4), p. 041002. [CrossRef]
Hischier, I. , Leumann, P. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2012, “ Experimental and Numerical Analyses of a Pressurized Air Receiver for Solar-Driven Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 134(2), p. 021003. [CrossRef]
Hischier, I. , Poživil, P. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2012, “ A Modular Ceramic Cavity-Receiver for High-Temperature High-Concentration Solar Applications,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 134(1), p. 011004. [CrossRef]
Poživil, P. , Aga, V. , Zagorskiy, A. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2014, “ A Pressurized Air Receiver for Solar-Driven Gas Turbines,” Energy Proc., 49, pp. 498–503. [CrossRef]
Poživil, P. , Ettlin, N. , Stucker, F. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2015, “ Modular Design and Experimental Testing of a 50 kWth Pressurized-Air Solar Receiver for Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(3), p. 031002. [CrossRef]
Hischier, I. , Poživil, P. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2015, “ Optical and Thermal Analysis of a Pressurized-Air Receiver Cluster for a 50 MWe Solar Power Tower,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(6), p. 061002. [CrossRef]
Winston, R. , Miñano, J. C. , and Benítez, P. , 2005, Nonimaging Optics, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Schmitz, M. , Schwarzbözl, P. , Buck, R. , and Pitz-Paal, R. , 2006, “ Assessment of the Potential Improvement Due to Multiple Apertures in Central Receiver Systems With Secondary Concentrators,” Sol. Energy, 80(1), pp. 111–120. [CrossRef]
Kribus, A. , Doron, P. , Rubin, R. , Karni, J. , Reuven, R. , Duchan, S. , and Taragan, E. , 1999, “ A Multistage Solar Receiver: The Route to High Temperature,” Sol. Energy, 67(1–3), pp. 3–11. [CrossRef]
Poživil, P. , Ackermann, S. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2015, “ Numerical Heat Transfer Analysis of a 50 kWth Pressurized-Air Solar Receiver for Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(6), p. 064504. [CrossRef]
Keenan, J. H. , Kaye, J. , and Caho, J. , 1985, Gas Tables, Wiley, New York.
Wagner, W. , and Pruss, A. , 2002, “ The IAPWS Formulation 1995 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Ordinary Water Substance for General and Scientific Use,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 31(2), pp. 387–535. [CrossRef]
Cumpsty, N. A. , 2004, Compressor Aerodynamics, Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL.
Saravanamuttoo, H. I. H. , Rogers, G. F. C. , and Cohen, H. , 2009, Gas Turbine Theory, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Ramesh, S. K. , and Dusan, S. P. , 2003, Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design, Wiley, New York.
Pacheco, J. E. , 2002, Final Test and Evaluation Results From the Solar Two Project, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
Boyce, M. P. , 2011, “ Combined Cycle Power Plant,” Energy and Power Generation Handbook, ASME Press, New York.
International Molybdenum Association, 2015, “ High-Temperature Steel,” International Molybdenum Association, London, UK, accessed Apr. 12, 2015, www.imoa.info
Bloch, H. P. , 1996, A Practical Guide to Steam Turbine Technology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Heller, P. , Pfänder, M. , Denk, T. , Tellez, F. , Valverde, A. , Fernandez, J. , and Ring, A. , 2006, “ Test and Evaluation of a Solar Powered Gas Turbine System,” Sol. Energy, 80(10), pp. 1225–1230. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. S., 2014, “ Solar Air Turbine Project—Final Report: Project Results,” Solar Thermal Foundation Project, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, Australia.
Sanz-Bermejo, J. , Gallardo-Natividad, V. , Gonzalez-Aguilar, J. , and Romero, M. , 2014, “ Comparative System Performance Analysis of Direct Steam Generation Central Receiver Solar Thermal Power Plants in Megawatt Range,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 136(1), p. 011028. [CrossRef]
Zanganeh, G. , Khanna, R. , Walser, C. , Pedretti, A. , Haselbacher, A. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2015, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Combined Sensible–Latent Heat for Thermal Energy Storage at 575 °C and Above,” Sol. Energy, 114, pp. 77–90. [CrossRef]
Ströhle, S. , Haselbacher, A. , Jovanovic, Z. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2014, “ Transient Discrete-Granule Packed-Bed Reactor Model for Thermochemical Energy Storage,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 117, pp. 465–478. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the solar receiver: The modular design consists of a cylindrical SiC cavity surrounded by a concentric annular RPC foam contained in a stainless steel PCV, with a secondary concentrator (CPC) attached to its windowless aperture [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Exemplary array of solar receiver modules arranged in a honeycomb structure consisting of 85 receiver-CPC units grouped into two clusters: 43 high-temperature units located in the center (black) and 42 low-temperature preheat units located at the edges of the array (white)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Energy balance of heat losses as a function of the receiver outlet air temperature [16]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cycle schematics: (a) simple Brayton, (b) recuperated Brayton, and (c) combined Brayton–Rankine cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fluid temperature versus relative heat transfer in an exemplary heat recovery steam generator consisting of (1) economizer, (2) evaporator, and (3) superheater [23]. The hot air flow (45) heats, evaporates, and superheats the water/steam flow (BC).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cycle efficiency versus pressure ratio of (a) Brayton cycle and (b) solar Brayton cycle for receiver outlet air temperatures ranging from 700 °C to 1400 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Cycle efficiency versus pressure ratio of (a) recuperated Brayton cycle and (b) solar recuperated cycle for receiver outlet air temperatures ranging from 700 °C to 1400 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Cycle efficiency versus pressure ratio of (a) combined Brayton–Rankine cycle and (b) solar combined cycle for receiver outlet air temperatures ranging from 700 °C to 1400 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Peak BC, RC, and CC cycle efficiency as a function of the preheat contribution. The dashed lines indicate the performance of the single-stage receiver array.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Cycle efficiency as a function of receiver outlet air temperature and pressure ratio versus the specific work output of (a) the solar Brayton cycle and (b) the solar combined Brayton–Rankine cycle. Cases with insufficient steam production are not displayed.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In