Technical Brief

The Effect of Local Meteorological Conditions on the Optimal Tilt Angle of a Solar Energy Collector—A Case Study in Poland

[+] Author and Article Information
Ryszard Myhan

Faculty of Technical Sciences,
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn,
ul. Oczapowskiego 11,
Olsztyn 10-719, Poland
e-mail: ryszard.myhan@uwm.edu.pl

Jacek Bieranowski

Faculty of Technical Sciences,
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn,
ul. Oczapowskiego 11,
Olsztyn 10-719, Poland
e-mail: jacbier@uwm.edu.pl

Zbigniew Szwejkowski

Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture,
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn,
ul. Oczapowskiego 8,
Olsztyn 10-719, Poland
e-mail: szwzbig@uwm.edu.pl

Eliza Sitnik

Faculty of Technical Sciences,
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn,
ul. Oczapowskiego 11,
Olsztyn 10-719, Poland
e-mail: eliza.sitnik@uwm.edu.pl

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received November 9, 2016; final manuscript received April 14, 2017; published online May 16, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Jorge Gonzalez.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 139(4), 044501 (May 16, 2017) (4 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1469; doi: 10.1115/1.4036637 History: Received November 09, 2016; Revised April 14, 2017

This study compares the potential annual energy absorption of a flat-plate solar collector at different tilt angles in Poland. Optimal tilt angles were tested in three variants: over the course of the year, in fall/winter and in spring/summer. The results were compared with automatically tracked collectors where the active surface is perpendicular to the angle at which solar radiation reaches the collector. The results were simulated based on the meteorological data. A comparison of the energy outputs of solar collectors in optimization variants 1, 2, and 3 indicates that variant 1 produces the highest energy output.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Duffie, J. A. , and Beckman, W. A. , 2013, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, Wiley, New York.
Pluta, Z. , 2013, Theory of Photothermal Conversion of Solar Energy, Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Horta, P. , Carvalho, M. J. , Pereira, M. C. , and Carbaja, W. , 2008, “ Long-Term Performance Calculations Based on Steady-State Efficiency Test Results: Analysis of Optical Effects Affecting Beam, Diffuse and Reflected Radiation,” Sol. Energy, 82(11), pp. 1076–1082. [CrossRef]
Kumar, S. , and Mullick, S. C. , 2012, “ Glass Cover Temperature and Top Heat Loss Coefficient of a Single Glazed Flat Plate Collector With Nearly Vertical Configuration,” Ain Shams Eng. J., 3(3), pp. 299–304. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, K.-B. , Yoon, S.-H. , and Choi, J. H. , 2012, “ Effect of Working-Fluid Filling Ratio and Cooling-Water Flow Rate on the Performance of Solar Collector With Closed-Loop Oscillating Heat Pipe,” J. Mech. Technol., 26(1), pp. 251–258. [CrossRef]
Sanaye, S. , and Hajabdollahi, H. , 2014, “ Thermo-Economic Optimization of Solar CCHP Using Both Genetic and Particle Swarm Algorithms,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(1), p. 011001. [CrossRef]
Agarwal, V. K. , and Larson, D. C. , 1981, “ Calculation of the Top Loss Coefficient of a Flat-Plate Collector,” Sol. Energy, 27(1), pp. 69–71. [CrossRef]
Klein, S. A. , 1975, “ Calculation of Flat-Plate Collector Loss Coefficients,” Sol. Energy, 17(1), pp. 79–80. [CrossRef]
Yakup, M. A. M. , and Malik, A. Q. , 2001, “ Optimum Tilt Angle and Orientation for Solar Collector in Brunei Darussalam,” Renewable Energy, 24(2), pp. 223–234. [CrossRef]
Shariah, A. , Al-Akhras, M. A. , and Al-Omari, I. A. , 2002, “ Optimizing the Tilt Angle of Solar Collectors,” Renewable Energy, 26(4), pp. 587–598. [CrossRef]
Gunerhan, H. , and Hepbasli, A. , 2007, “ Determination of the Optimum Tilt Angle of Solar Collectors for Building Applications,” Build. Sci., 42(2), pp. 779–783.
Bari, S. , 2000, “ Optimum Slope Angle and Orientation of Solar Collectors for Different Periods of Possible Utilization,” Energy Convers. Manage., 41(8), pp. 855–860. [CrossRef]
Tang, R. , and Wu, T. , 2004, “ Optimal Tilt-Angles for Solar Collectors Used in China,” Appl. Energy, 79(3), pp. 239–248. [CrossRef]
Benghanem, M. , 2011, “ Optimization of Tilt Angle for Solar Panel: Case Study for Madinah, Saudi Arabia,” Appl. Energy, 88(4), pp. 1427–1433. [CrossRef]
Bakirci, K. , 2012, “ Correlations for Optimum Tilt Angles of Solar Collectors: A Case Study in Erzurum, Turkey,” Energy Sources Part A, 34(11), pp. 983–993. [CrossRef]
European Solar Thermal Industry Federation, 2015, “ The Solar Keymark Database,” European Solar Thermal Industry Federation, Brussel, Belgium, accessed Nov. 22, 2015, http://www.solarkeymark.dk/collectorcertificates
Cooper, P. I. , 1969, “ The Absorption of Radiation in Solar Stills,” Sol. Energy, 12(3), pp. 333–346. [CrossRef]
Lamm, L. O. , 1981, “ A New Analytic Expression for the Equation of Time,” Sol. Energy, 26(5), p. 465. [CrossRef]
Pascoe, D. J. B. , 1985, “ Comments on Solar Position Programs: Refraction, Sidereal Time and Sunset/Sunrise,” Sol. Energy, 34(2), pp. 205–206. [CrossRef]
Blanc, Ph. , and Wald, L. , 2012, “ The SG2 Algorithm for a Fast and Accurate Computation of the Position of the Sun for Multi-Decadal Time Period,” Sol. Energy, 86(10), pp. 3072–3083. [CrossRef]
Keller, C. , and Hall, J. K. , 2000, “ Using a Digital Terrain Model to Calculate Visual Sunrise and Sunset Times,” Comput. Geosci., 26(9–10), pp. 991–1000. [CrossRef]
Grena, R. , 2012, “ Five New Algorithms for the Computation of Sun Position From 2010 to 2110,” Sol. Energy, 86(5), pp. 1323–1337. [CrossRef]
Fathi, N. Y. , and Samer, A. , 2016, “ View Factors of Flat Solar Collectors Array in Flat, Inclined, and Step-Like Solar Fields,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 138(6), p. 061005. [CrossRef]
Fleck, B. A. , Meier, R. M. , and Matović, M. D. , 2002, “ A Field Study of the Wind Effects on the Performance of an Unglazed Transpired Solar Collector,” Sol. Energy, 73(3), pp. 209–216. [CrossRef]
Kumar, S. , and Mullick, S. C. , 2010, “ Wind Heat Transfer Coefficient in Solar Collectors in Outdoor Conditions,” Sol. Energy, 84(6), pp. 956–963. [CrossRef]
Latala, H. , 2007, “ Absorber Efficiency in Function of Ambient Temperature and Operating Parameters of Liquid Collector,” Agric. Eng., 9(97), pp. 127–134.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Potential radiation (given absolute atmospheric clarity) and measured radiation on selected days of the year

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Angle at which sun rays reach the collector surface on selected days of the year

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Wind speed, ambient temperature, radiation intensity, and daily energy output per m2 of absorber area (intensity of solar radiation; radiation incident on the surface of the solar collector, radiation incident on the surface of the absorber)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In