Research Papers

Design and Characterization of a 7.2 kW Solar Simulator

[+] Author and Article Information
Antoine Boubault, Julius Yellowhair

Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS-1127,
Albuquerque, NM 87185-1127

Clifford K. Ho

Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS-1127,
Albuquerque, NM 87185-1127
e-mail: ckho@sandia.gov

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received December 30, 2015; final manuscript received March 22, 2017; published online April 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Philippe Blanc. The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States government purposes.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 139(3), 031012 (Apr 25, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1457; doi: 10.1115/1.4036411 History: Received December 30, 2015; Revised March 22, 2017

A 7.2 kW (electric input) solar simulator was designed in order to perform accelerated testing on absorber materials for concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies. computer-aided design (cad) software integrating a ray-tracing tool was used to select appropriate components and optimize their positioning in order to achieve the desired concentration. The simulator comprises four identical units, each made out of an ellipsoidal reflector, a metal halide lamp, and an adjustable holding system. A single unit was characterized and shows an experimental average irradiance of 257 kW m−2 on a 25.4 mm (1 in) diameter spot. Shape, spot size, and average irradiance are in good agreement with the model predictions, provided the emitting arc element model is realistic. The innovative four-lamp solar simulator potentially demonstrates peak irradiance of 1140 kW m−2 and average irradiance of 878 kW m−2 over a 25.4 mm diameter area. The electric-to-radiative efficiency is about 0.86. The costs per radiative and electric watt are calculated at $2.31 W−1 and $1.99 W−1, respectively. An upgraded installation including a sturdier structure, computer-controlled lamps, a more reliable lamp holding system, and safety equipment yields a cost per electric watt of about $3.60 W−1 excluding labor costs.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Design , Solar energy , Metals
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Petrasch, J. , Coray, P. , Meier, A. , Brack, M. , Häberling, P. , Wuillemin, D. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2006, “ A Novel 50 kW 11,000 Suns High-Flux Solar Simulator Based on an Array of Xenon Arc Lamps,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 129(4), pp. 405–411. [CrossRef]
Alxneit, I. , and Schmit, H. , 2011, “ Spectral Characterization of PSI’s High-Flux Solar Simulator,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 134(1), p. 011013. [CrossRef]
Hirsch, D. , Zedtwitz, P. v. , Osinga, T. , Kinamore, J. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2003, “ A New 75 kW High-Flux Solar Simulator for High-Temperature Thermal and Thermochemical Research,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 125(1), pp. 117–120. [CrossRef]
Bader, R. , Haussener, S. , and Lipiński, W. , 2014, “ Optical Design of Multisource High-Flux Solar Simulators,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(2), p. 021012. [CrossRef]
Krueger, K. R. , Lipiński, W. , and Davidson, J. H. , 2013, “ Operational Performance of the University of Minnesota 45 kWe High-Flux Solar Simulator,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 135(4), p. 044501. [CrossRef]
Sarwar, J. , Georgakis, G. , LaChance, R. , and Ozalp, N. , 2014, “ Description and Characterization of an Adjustable Flux Solar Simulator for Solar Thermal, Thermochemical and Photovoltaic Applications,” Sol. Energy, 100, pp. 179–194. [CrossRef]
Codd, D. S. , Carlson, A. , Rees, J. , and Slocum, A. H. , 2010, “ A Low Cost High Flux Solar Simulator,” Sol. Energy, 84(12), pp. 2202–2212. [CrossRef]
Optiforms, 1996, “ Optiforms E813-7 Drawing,” Optiforms, Temecula, CA, accessed Apr. 17, 2017, http://cdn.optiforms.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/E813-r.pdf
Bass, M. , Van Stryland, E. , Williams, D. , and Wolfe, W. , 1995, Handbook of Optics, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Osram Sylvania, 2008, “ XBO—Theater Lamps,” Osram Sylvania, Wilmington, MA, accessed Feb. 9, 2015, http://assets.sylvania.com/assets/documents/ENGR_BLTN11.161355cc-1d94-4996-b6cd-a3001fea6f1a.pdf
NREL, 2003, “ Reference Solar Spectral Irradiance: Air Mass 1.5,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, accessed Feb. 9, 2015, http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/
Kockott, D. , and Schoenlein, A. , 2012, “ To What Extent Does the Radiation of a Solar Simulator Meet a ‘Reference Sun’? A Quantitative Approach,” Polym. Test., 31(5), pp. 710–715. [CrossRef]
Osram Sylvania, “ HMI 18000 W/SE XS Product Information,” Osram Sylvania, Wilmington, MA, accessed Apr. 19, 2017, https://www.osram.com/osram_com/products/lamps/specialty-lamps/metal-halide-lamps/hmi/index.jsp?productId=ZMP_56241
Alxneit, I. , and Dibowski, G. , 2011, “ R12.5 Solar Simulator Evaluation Report,” Solar Facilities for the European Research Area Project, European Union, Brussels, Belgium, Deliverable 12.5.
Wang, W. , Aichmayer, L. , Laumert, B. , and Fransson, T. , 2014, “ Design and Validation of a Low-Cost High-Flux Solar Simulator Using Fresnel Lens Concentrators,” SolarPACES 2013 International Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 17–20, Vol. 49, pp. 2221–2230.
Gill, R. , Bush, E. , Haueter, P. , and Loutzenhiser, P. , 2015, “ Characterization of a 6 kW High-Flux Solar Simulator With an Array of Xenon Arc Lamps Capable of Concentrations of Nearly 5000 Suns,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 86(12), p. 125107. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Ray optical paths for different source locations. F1 and F2 are the two focal points of the ellipse. Point V is defined as the vertex of the reflector. The distance between F1 and F2 is defined as the interfocal length.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Spectral hemispherical reflectivity of silver [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Spectral intensity of typical Xenon [10] and metal halide arcs (OSRAM data for HMI 2500 W/SE XS) compared to the solar spectrum [11]. The data are normalized to have an average value equal to 1.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

HMI 1800 W/SE XS metal halide lamp. Total length: ∼200 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Optiforms E813-7 reflector with HMI 1800 W/SE XS lamp

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Four-lamp solar simulator design (upgraded structure)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Lamp/reflector assembly concentrating on a coupon

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Incident flux distribution for one lamp-reflector unit in the nominal configuration (F1S = 0 and F1T = 812.8 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Incident flux distribution for one lamp-reflector unit tilted at 31.0 deg (located at top of flux map), in the nominal configuration (F1S = 0 and F1T = 812.8 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Incident flux distribution for four lamp-reflector units in the nominal configuration (F1S = 0 and F1T = 812.8 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Kendall radiometer mounted on a holding system for irradiance calibration measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Flux mapping with a camera and a white board at 30 deg tilt angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Simulated and experimental peak and average irradiance over a 25.4 mm (1 in) diameter disk for several focus-to-target distances. The nominal configuration is represented by the vertical line.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Incident flux distribution at normal incidence (F1S= 0 and F1T= 800 mm) and normal incidence. The grid seen in the image has size equal to 0.5 in × 0.5 in (12.7 mm × 12.7 mm).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Slice plots of the simulated and experimental irradiance depending on the arc diameter (F1S= 0 and F1T= 800 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Incident flux distribution with a tilt angle of 30 deg (F1S= 0 and F1T= 800 mm). The grid seen in the image has size equal to 0.5 in × 0.5 in (12.7 mm × 12.7 mm). The lamp unit is located at the top of the flux map.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Slice plots of the experimental (experiment) and predicted (model) irradiance for a 30 deg tilted reflector and arc diameter of 6 mm (F1S = 0 and F1T = 800 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Combined incident flux distribution from experimental results of four identical lamp/reflector units (F1S = 0 and F1T= 800 mm). The grid seen in the image has size equal to 0.5 in × 0.5 in (12.7 mm × 12.7 mm).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Slice plots of the combined (experiment) and predicted (model) irradiance for four lamp-reflector units with an arc diameter of 6 mm (F1S= 0 and F1T = 800 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Sandia’s 7.2 kWe solar simulator




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In