Research Papers

Effects of Preferential Concentration on Heat Transfer in Particle-Based Solar Receivers

[+] Author and Article Information
Hadi Pouransari

Center for Turbulence Research,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305
e-mail: hadip@stanford.edu

Ali Mani

Center for Turbulence Research,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305
e-mail: alimani@stanford.edu

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received July 21, 2016; final manuscript received November 2, 2016; published online November 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Nesrin Ozalp.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 139(2), 021008 (Nov 29, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1335; doi: 10.1115/1.4035163 History: Received July 21, 2016; Revised November 02, 2016

The working principle of particle-based solar receivers is to utilize the absorptivity of a dispersed particle phase in an otherwise optically transparent carrier fluid. In comparison to their traditional counterparts, which use a solid surface for radiation absorption, particle-based receivers offer a number of opportunities for improved efficiency and heat transfer uniformity. The physical phenomena at the core of such receivers involve coupling between particle transport, fluid turbulence, and radiative heat transfer. Previous analyses of particle-based solar receivers ignored delicate aspects associated with this three-way coupling. Namely, these investigations considered the flow fields only in the mean sense and ignored turbulent fluctuations and the consequent particle preferential concentration. In the present work, we have performed three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows coupled with radiative heating and particle transport over a range of particle Stokes numbers. Our study demonstrates that the particle preferential concentration has strong implications on the heat transfer statistics. We demonstrate that “for a typical setting” the preferential concentration of particles reduces the effective heat transfer between particles and the gas by as much as 25%. Therefore, we conclude that a regime with Stokes number of order unity is the least preferred for heat transfer to the carrier fluid. We also provide a 1D model to capture the effect of particle spatial distribution in heat transfer.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Smil, V. , 2013, Energy: A Beginner's Guide, Oneworld Publications, Oxford, UK.
Mancini, T. R. , Kolb, G. J. , and Prairie, M. R. , 1997, “ Solar Thermal Power,” Adv. Sol. Energy, 11, pp. 1–42.
Kogan, M. , and Kogan, A. , 2003, “ Production of Hydrogen and Carbon by Solar Thermal Methane Splitting. I. The Unseeded Reactor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 28(11), pp. 1187–1198. [CrossRef]
Romero, M. , Buck, R. , and Pacheco, J. E. , 2002, “ An Update on Solar Central Receiver Systems, Projects, and Technologies,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 98–108. [CrossRef]
Abdelrahman, M. , Fumeaux, P. , and Suter, P. , 1979, “ Study of Solid-Gas-Suspensions Used for Direct Absorption of Concentrated Solar Radiation,” Sol. Energy, 22(1), pp. 45–48. [CrossRef]
Ho, C. K. , and Iverson, B. D. , 2014, “ Review of High-Temperature Central Receiver Designs for Concentrating Solar Power,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 29, pp. 835–846. [CrossRef]
Minardi, J. E. , and Chuang, H. N. , 1975, “ Performance of a Black Liquid Flat-Plate Solar Collector,” Sol. Energy, 17(3), pp. 179–183. [CrossRef]
Hunt, A. J. , 1979, “ A New Solar Thermal Receiver Utilizing a Small Particle Heat Exchanger,” 14th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 159–163.
Bertocchi, R. , Karni, J. , and Kribus, A. , 2004, “ Experimental Evaluation of a Non-Isothermal High Temperature Solar Particle Receiver,” Energy, 29(5), pp. 687–700. [CrossRef]
Klein, H. H. , Rubin, R. , and Karni, J. , 2008, “ Experimental Evaluation of Particle Consumption in a Particle Seeded Solar Receiver,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 130(1), p. 011012. [CrossRef]
Kim, K. , Siegel, N. , Kolb, G. , Rangaswamy, V. , and Moujaes, S. F. , 2009, “ A Study of Solid Particle Flow Characterization in Solar Particle Receiver,” Sol. Energy, 83(10), pp. 1784–1793. [CrossRef]
Siegel, N. P. , Ho, C. K. , Khalsa, S. S. , and Kolb, G. J. , 2010, “ Development and Evaluation of a Prototype Solid Particle Receiver: On-Sun Testing and Model Validation,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 132(2), p. 021008. [CrossRef]
Heller, P. , Pfänder, M. , Denk, T. , Tellez, F. , Valverde, A. , Fernandez, J. , and Ring, A. , 2006, “ Test and Evaluation of a Solar Powered Gas Turbine System,” Sol. Energy, 80(10), pp. 1225–1230. [CrossRef]
Miller, F. J. , and Hunt, A. J. , 2012, “ Developing the Small Particle Heat Exchange Receiver for a Prototype Test,” ASME Paper No. ES2012-91337.
Maag, G. , Rodat, S. , Flamant, G. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2010, “ Heat Transfer Model and Scale-Up of an Entrained-Flow Solar Reactor for the Thermal Decomposition of Methane,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35(24), pp. 13232–13241. [CrossRef]
Miller, F. , and Koenigsdorff, R. , 1991, “ Theoretical Analysis of a High-Temperature Small-Particle Solar Receiver,” Sol. Energy Mater., 24(1), pp. 210–221. [CrossRef]
Miller, F. J. , and Koenigsdorff, R. W. , 2000, “ Thermal Modeling of a Small-Particle Solar Central Receiver,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 122(1), pp. 23–29. [CrossRef]
Chu, C.-M. , and Churchill, S. W. , 1955, “ Numerical Solution of Problems in Multiple Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation,” J. Phys. Chem., 59(9), pp. 855–863. [CrossRef]
Ruther, S. J. , 2010, “ Radiation Heat Transfer Simulation of a Small Particle Solar Receiver Using the Monte Carlo Method,” Master's thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Crocker, A. , and Miller, F. , 2011, “ Coupled Fluid Flow and Radiative Modeling for a Small Particle Solar Receiver,” AIAA Paper No. 2011-5902.
Chen, H. , Chen, Y. , Hsieh, H.-T. , and Siegel, N. , 2007, “ Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Gas-Particle Flow Within a Solid-Particle Solar Receiver,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 129(2), pp. 160–170. [CrossRef]
Yuen, W. W. , Miller, F. J. , and Hunt, A. J. , 1986, “ Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Gas-Particle Mixture Under Direct Radiant Heating,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 13(2), pp. 145–154. [CrossRef]
Klein, H. H. , Karni, J. , Ben-Zvi, R. , and Bertocchi, R. , 2007, “ Heat Transfer in a Directly Irradiated Solar Receiver/Reactor for Solid–Gas Reactions,” Sol. Energy, 81(10), pp. 1227–1239. [CrossRef]
Eaton, J. K. , and Fessler, J. R. , 1994, “ Preferential Concentration of Particles by Turbulence,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 20(Suppl. 1), pp. 169–209. [CrossRef]
Squires, K. D. , and Eaton, J. K. , 1991, “ Preferential Concentration of Particles by Turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 3(5), pp. 1169–1178. [CrossRef]
Chen, X.-Q. , 2000, “ Heavy Particle Dispersion in Inhomogeneous, Anisotropic, Turbulent Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 26(4), pp. 635–661. [CrossRef]
Rouson, D. W. I. , and Eaton, J. K. , 2001, “ On the Preferential Concentration of Solid Particles in Turbulent Channel Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 428, pp. 149–169. [CrossRef]
Fessler, J. R. , Kulick, J. D. , and Eaton, J. K. , 1994, “ Preferential Concentration of Heavy Particles in a Turbulent Channel Flow,” Phys. Fluids (1994-Present), 6(11), pp. 3742–3749. [CrossRef]
Kulick, J. D. , Fessler, J. R. , and Eaton, J. K. , 1994, “ Particle Response and Turbulence Modification in Fully Developed Channel Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 277, pp. 109–134. [CrossRef]
Wood, A. M. , Hwang, W. , and Eaton, J. K. , 2005, “ Preferential Concentration of Particles in Homogeneous and Isotropic Turbulence,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 31(10), pp. 1220–1230. [CrossRef]
Tanaka, T. , and Eaton, J. K. , 2010, “ Sub-Kolmogorov Resolution Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements of Particle-Laden Forced Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 643, pp. 177–206. [CrossRef]
Birzer, C. H. , Kalt, P. A. M. , and Nathan, G. J. , 2012, “ The Influences of Particle Mass Loading on Mean and Instantaneous Particle Distributions in Precessing Jet Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 41, pp. 13–22. [CrossRef]
Zamansky, R. , Coletti, F. , Massot, M. , and Mani, A. , 2014, “ Radiation Induces Turbulence in Particle-Laden Fluids,” Phys. Fluids (1994-Present), 26(7), p. 071701. [CrossRef]
Frankel, A. , Pouransari, H. , Coletti, F. , and Mani, A. , 2016, “ Settling of Heated Particles in Homogeneous Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 792, pp. 869–893. [CrossRef]
Bertocchi, R. , 2002, “ Carbon Particle Cloud Generation for a Solar Particle Receiver,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(3), pp. 230–236. [CrossRef]
Miller, F. J. , 1988, “ Radiative Heat Transfer in a Flowing Gas-Particle Mixture,” Ph.D. thesis, California University, Berkeley, CA.
Reeks, M. W. , 1983, “ The Transport of Discrete Particles in Inhomogeneous Turbulence,” J. Aerosol Sci., 14(6), pp. 729–739. [CrossRef]
Crowe, C. T. , Troutt, T. R. , and Chung, J. N. , 1996, “ Numerical Models for Two-Phase Turbulent Flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 28(1), pp. 11–43. [CrossRef]
Horwitz, J. A. K. , and Mani, A. , 2016, “ Accurate Calculation of Stokes Drag for Point–Particle Tracking in Two-Way Coupled Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 318, pp. 85–109. [CrossRef]
Vié, A. , Pouransari, H. , Zamansky, R. , and Mani, A. , 2016, “ Particle-Laden Flows Forced by the Disperse Phase: Comparison Between Lagrangian and Eulerian Simulations,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 79, pp. 144–158. [CrossRef]
Maxey, M. R. , and Riley, J. J. , 1983, “ Equation of Motion for a Small Rigid Sphere in a Nonuniform Flow,” Phys. Fluids (1958–1988), 26(4), pp. 883–889. [CrossRef]
Pouransari, H. , Mortazavi, M. , and Mani, A. , 2015, “ Parallel Variable-Density Particle-Laden Turbulence Simulation,” Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Standford, CA, pp. 43–54.
Rosales, C. , and Meneveau, C. , 2005, “ Linear Forcing in Numerical Simulations of Isotropic Turbulence: Physical Space Implementations and Convergence Properties,” Phys. Fluids (1994-Present), 17(9), p. 095106. [CrossRef]
Eswaran, V. , and Pope, S. B. , 1988, “ An Examination of Forcing in Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulence,” Comput. Fluids, 16(3), pp. 257–278. [CrossRef]
Frankel, A. , Iaccarino, G. , and Mani, A. , 2016, “ Convergence of the Bouguer–Beer Law for Radiation Extinction in Particulate Media,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 182, pp. 45–54. [CrossRef]
Sundaram, S. , and Collins, L. R. , 1997, “ Collision Statistics in an Isotropic Particle-Laden Turbulent Suspension. Part 1. Direct Numerical Simulations,” J. Fluid Mech., 335, pp. 75–109. [CrossRef]
Monchaux, R. , Bourgoin, M. , and Cartellier, A. , 2010, “ Preferential Concentration of Heavy Particles: A Voronoï Analysis,” Phys. Fluids (1994-Present), 22(10), p. 103304. [CrossRef]
Tagawa, Y. , Mercado, J. M. , Prakash, V. N. , Calzavarini, E. , Sun, C. , and Lohse, D. , 2012, “ Three-Dimensional Lagrangian Voronoi Analysis for Clustering of Particles and Bubbles in Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 693, pp. 201–215. [CrossRef]
Esmaily-Moghadam, M. , and Mani, A. , 2015, “ An Analytical Description of Clustering of Inertial Particles in Turbulent Flows,” e-print .


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Computational domain. The side and bottom walls of the channel are colored by gas temperature and particle concentration, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Approximate range of particle volume fraction versus particle relaxation time in some of the recent studies of particle-based solar receivers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematics of a particle-based solar receiver (a) in contrast to a conventional receiver (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized temperature PDFs at the domain outlet: (a) gas; (b) particles; (c) normalized standard deviation of particle and gas temperature at the domain outlet for different Stokes numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Two-dimensional radial distribution function at the outlet of the domain for different cases. Radial distance is nondimensionalized by the inlet Kolmogorov length.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Spatial autocovariance of the gas temperature at the outlet of the domain for different Stokes numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Gas and particle temperatures at the outlet: (a) mean; (b) particle-gas temperature difference

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Dimensional mean gas and particle temperatures for the parameter set given in Table 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Voronoi tessellation of particles at the exit of the domain for: (a) case 1 colored by the normalized particle temperature; (b) case 1 colored by the normalized gas temperature at the location particle; (c) case 4 colored by the normalized particle temperature; (d) case 4 colored by the normalized gas temperature at the location particle. The same color map is used for all figures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Averaged standard deviation of the normalized Voronoi cell volumes as in Ref. [47] at the domain outlet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Snapshots of the simulations for different Stokes numbers (from 0.04 at the bottom to 9.2 at the top). Left: particle concentration contours in the inlet yz plane, middle: gas temperature contours in the mid xy plane, right: gas temperature contours in the exit yz plane.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Results of the 1D model as functions of streamwise location for different particle relaxation times. Arrows show increasing particle relaxation time. (a) nondimensionalized mean gas (solid) and particle (dashed) temperatures; (b) nondimensionalized particle-gas temperature difference; (c) nondimensionalized radiative heat absorption by particles, Ha; (d) heat transfer from the dispersed phase to the gas phase, Ht. Heat absorption and heat transfer are nondimensionalized by nominal radiative heat absorption per unit volume 1/4πDp2ϵpIn0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Correction factor as a function of Stokes number; (b) correction factor versus St*, the amount of particle clustering. Points' colors are the same in two figures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Averaged particle temperature at the exit of the domain as a function of particle Stokes number; (b) averaged particle-gas temperature difference at the exit of the domain as a function particle Stokes number



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In