0
Research Papers

Simulation Model of Photovoltaic and Photovoltaic/Thermal Module/String Under Nonuniform Distribution of Irradiance and Temperature

[+] Author and Article Information
Giuseppe Marco Tina

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica
Elettronica e dei Sistemi,
Università di Catania,
Viale Andrea Doria 6,
Catania 95125, Italy
e-mail: giuseppe.tina@dieei.unict.it

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received June 6, 2016; final manuscript received November 1, 2016; published online December 22, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Carlos F. M. Coimbra.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 139(2), 021013 (Dec 22, 2016) (12 pages) Paper No: SOL-16-1263; doi: 10.1115/1.4035152 History: Received June 06, 2016; Revised November 01, 2016

The modern concepts of sustainable cities and smart grids have caused an increase in the installation of solar systems in urban and suburban areas, where, due to the presence of many obstacles or design constraints, photovoltaic (PV) modules can operate in operating conditions that are very different from the optimal ones (e.g., standard test conditions, STC). Shading and reflection are the main phenomena that cause uneven distribution of irradiance on PV cells; in turn, they create a nonuniform distribution of PV cell temperatures. The latter problem can also be caused by different ventilation regimes in various parts of the PV array. On the other hand, due to the need to exploit different solar technologies (solar thermal and photovoltaic), problems related to the availability of a useful surface can arise. In this context, there is a technology that produces heat end electrical energy at the same time, such a technology is referred to as a solar hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T). Here, the uneven distribution of temperature is a design input and its effect depends on both path of the water flow and the PV cell connections. To study the electrical behavior of a PV array under mismatching conditions, a suitable matlab/simulink model has been developed. The model has been tested both numerically and experimentally. Finally, an application of this model in the electrical analysis of a PV/T module is reported, and the results are discussed.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Calvillo, C. F. , Sánchez-Miralles, A. , and Villar, J. , 2016, “ Energy Management and Planning in Smart Cities,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 55, pp. 273–287. [CrossRef]
Michael, J. J. , Iniyan, S. , and Goic, R. , 2015, “ Flat Plate Solar Photovoltaic–Thermal (PV/T) Systems: A Reference Guide,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 51, pp. 62–68. [CrossRef]
Good, C. , 2016, “ Environmental Impact Assessments of Hybrid Photovoltaic–Thermal (PV/T) Systems–A Review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 55, pp. 234–239. [CrossRef]
Kodysh, J. B. , Omitaomu, O. A. , Bhaduri, B. L. , and Neish, B. S. , 2013, “ Methodology for Estimating Solar Potential on Multiple Building Rooftops for Photovoltaic Systems,” Sustainable Cities Soc., 8, pp. 31–41. [CrossRef]
Mandalaki, M. , Papantoniou, S. , and Tsoutsos, T. D. , 2014, “ Assessment of Energy Production From Photovoltaic Modules Integrated in Typical Shading Devices,” Sustainable Cities Soc., 10, pp. 222–231. [CrossRef]
Kang, S. , Hwang, T. , and Kim, J. T. , 2012, “ Theoretical Analysis of the Blinds Integrated Photovoltaic Modules,” Energy Build., 46, pp. 86–91. [CrossRef]
Ayaz, R. , Nakir, I. , and Tanrioven, M. , 2014, “ An Improved matlabsimulink Model of PV Module Considering Ambient Conditions,” Int. J. Photoenergy, 2014, p. 315893.
Selmi, T. , Abdul-Niby, M. , Devis, L. , and Davis, A. , 2014, “ P&O MPPT Implementation Using matlab/simulink,” Ninth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies, Monte-Carlo, Monaco, Mar. 25–27.
Blorfan, A. , Flieller, D. , Wira, P. , Sturtzer, G. , and Jean, M. , 2010, “ A New Approach for Modeling the Photovoltaic Cell Using Orcad Comparing With the Model Done in matlab,” Int. Rev. Modell. Simul., 3(5), pp. 948–954. http://www.trop.uha.fr/pdf/iremos_2010.pdf
Wang, Y. J. , and Hsu, P. C. , 2011, “ Modelling of Solar Cells and Modules Using Piecewise Linear Parallel Branches,” IET Renewable Power Gener., 5(3), pp. 215–222. [CrossRef]
Campbell, R. C. , 2007, “ A Circuit-Based Photovoltaic Array Model for Power System Studies,” 39th North American Power Symposium, IEEE, Las Cruces, NM, Sept. 30–Oct. 2.
Sreekumar, A. V. , and Rajendren, A. , 2014, “ Maximum Power Point Tracking of PV Arrays Under Partial Shading Condition Using Sepic Converter,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 3(7), pp. 398–404. http://esatjournals.net/ijret/2014v03/i19/IJRET20140319072.pdf
Jena, D. , and Ramana, V. V. , 2015, “ Modeling of Photovoltaic System for Uniform and Non-Uniform Irradiance: A Critical Review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 52, pp. 400–417. [CrossRef]
Boyd, M. , Klein, S. , Reindl, D. T. , and Dougherty, B. , 2011, “ Evaluation and Validation of Equivalent Circuit Photovoltaic Solar Cell Performance Models,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 133(2), p. 21005. [CrossRef]
Rosa-Clot, M. , Rosa-Clot, P. , and Tina, G. M. , 2011, “ TESPI: Thermal Electric Solar Panel Integration,” Solar Energy, 85(10), pp. 2433–2442. [CrossRef]
Grasso, A. D. , Pennisi, S. , Ragusa, M. , Tina, G. M. , and Ventura, C. , 2015, “ Performance Evaluation of a Multistring Photovoltaic Module With Distributed DC–DC Converters,” IET Renewable Power Gener., 9(8), pp. 935–942. [CrossRef]
Tina, G. M. , and Abate, R. , 2008, “ Experimental Verification of Thermal Behavior of Photovoltaic Modules,” 14th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Ajaccio, France, May 5–7.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Shading and reflection phenomena of solar radiation in the urban context

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Equivalent circuit for one-diode electrical PV module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variation of I–V and P–V curves with PV cell temperature (Irr = 1 kW/m2, Voc = 38.82 V, Isc = 8.2 A, Vmp = 31.71 V, Imp = 7.52 A, ki = 0.0531%/ °C and kv = −0.3143%/ °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of I–V and P–V curves with irradiance (Tc = 25 °C, Voc = 38.82 V, Isc = 8.2 A, Vmp = 31.71 V, Imp = 7.52 A, ki = 0.0531%/ °C, and kv = −0.3143%/ °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Electric model: (a) for PV module divided in three sections and (b) for temperature mismatch inside a PV string

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

simulink block diagram for a PV system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

simulink block diagram of a PV cell

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

PLPB method: (a) linearization of I–V diode curve and (b) equivalent circuit of the diode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Equivalent circuit of the PV module using PLPB method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Modified PLPB method: R1–T curve (solid line) and E1–T curve (dashed line)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Block diagram of the modified PLPB method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison between the measured (dashed lines) andsimulated (solid lines) I–V and P–V curves: Irr = 830 W/m2 and T = 53 °C, and Irr = 610 W/m2 and T = 48 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

simulink model used for the simulations under nonuniform irradiance conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison between the measured (dashed line) and simulated (solid line) P–V curves: (a) Irr mean = 980 W/m2 and T mean = 50 °C, percentage of irradiance on substrings 86.98%–100%–100% and (b) Irr mean = 800 W/m2 and T mean = 48 °C, percentage of irradiance on substrings 73.96–86.98–100%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

simulink model of a PV system with two strings connected in parallel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison between the measured (solid line) and simulated (dashed line) I–V and P–V curves under uniform irradiance condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison between the measured (markers) and simulated (solid line) I–V (a) and P–V (b) curves when one module of string II is shaded: (A) I–V (P–V) curve of the parallel of the two strings; (B) string I with no shading; and (C) string II with one module shaded

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparison between P–V curves under normal (dashed line) and nonuniform irradiance conditions (solid line)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

System used for experimental tests and thermal image of the model under an uneven temperature distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

simulink models used for the simulations: (a) substrings in series and (b) substrings in parallel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

P–V curves of a PV module with substring connected in series: (a) measured (solid line) and simulated (dotted line) P–V curves of two substrings of the PV module under nonuniform temperature condition (Irr = 695 W/m2, Thot = 55 °C, Tcold = 45 °C), and (b) simulated P–V curves of the module under normal and nonuniform temperature conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Substring connected in parallel—comparison between P–V curves: (a) of the three substring under nonuniform temperature condition, and (b) simulated P-V curves of the module under normal (upper line) and nonuniform (lower line) temperature conditions (Irr = 695 W/m2, Thot = 55 °C, Tcold = 45 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Thermal image of the module under an uneven temperature distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

simulink models used for the simulation: (a) substrings in series and (b) substrings in parallel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Substring connected in series—comparison between P–V curves: (a) three substrings under nonuniform temperature condition and (b) module under normal and nonuniform temperature conditions (Irr = 775 W/m2, Thot = 55 °C, Tcold = 45.5 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Distribution of PV cell temperatures in a PVT module with substrings in series: (a) vertical water flow pattern, (b) horizontal water flow pattern, and (c) P–V curve for the PV module at 1000 W/m2 (solid curves), with 30% of the module, i.e., the third substring, shaded (dashed curves)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

Distribution of PV cell temperatures in a PV/T module with substrings connected in parallel: (a) vertical water flow pattern, (b) horizontal water flow pattern, (c) P–V curves at 1000 W/m2 (solid curves) and with 30% of the module, i.e., the third substring, shaded (dashed curves)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In