Research Papers

Numbering-Up of Microscale Devices for Megawatt-Scale Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Concentrating Solar Power Receivers

[+] Author and Article Information
Kyle R. Zada, Matthew B. Hyder, M. Kevin Drost

School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331

Brian M. Fronk

School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: brian.fronk@oregonstate.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received December 11, 2015; final manuscript received August 2, 2016; published online September 19, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Mary Jane Hale.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(6), 061007 (Sep 19, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1421; doi: 10.1115/1.4034516 History: Received December 11, 2015; Revised August 02, 2016

Concentrated solar power (CSP) plants have the potential to reduce the consumption of nonrenewable resources and greenhouse gas emissions in electricity production. In CSP systems, a field of heliostats focuses solar radiation on a central receiver, and energy is then transferred to a thermal power plant at high temperature. However, maximum receiver surface fluxes are low (30–100 W cm−2) with high thermal losses, which has contributed to the limited market penetration of CSP systems. Recently, small (∼4 cm2), laminated micro pin-fin devices have shown potential to achieve concentrated surface fluxes over 100 W cm−2 using supercritical CO2 as the working fluid. The present study explores the feasibility of using these microscale unit cells as building blocks for a megawatt-scale (250 MW thermal) open solar receiver through a numbering-up approach, where multiple microscale unit cell devices are connected in parallel. A multiscale model of the full-scale central receiver is developed. The model consists of interconnected unit cell and module level (i.e., multiple unit cells in parallel) submodels which predict local performance of the central receiver. Each full-scale receiver consists of 3000 micro pin-fin unit cells divided into 250 modules. The performance of three different full-scale receivers is simulated under representative operating conditions. The results show that the microscale unit cells have the potential to be numbered up to megawatt applications while providing high heat flux and thermal efficiency. At the design incident flux and surface emissivity, a global receiver efficiency of approximately 90% when heating sCO2 from 550 °C to 650 °C at an average incident flux of 110 W cm−2 can be achieved.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Goswami, D. Y. , 2015, Principles of Solar Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Ortega, J. I. , Burgaleta, J. I. , and Téllez, F. M. , 2008, “ Central Receiver System Solar Power Plant Using Molten Salt as Heat Transfer Fluid,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 130(2), p. 024501. [CrossRef]
Stine, W. , and Geyer, M. , 2001, “ Power From the Sun,” Power From The Sun, Pomona, CA. http://www.powerfromthesun.net/
Margolis, R. , Coggeshall, C. , and Zuboy, J. , 2012, “ Sunshot Vision Study,” U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Washington, DC.
Iverson, B. D. , Conboy, T. M. , Pasch, J. J. , and Kruizenga, A. M. , 2013, “ Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycles for Solar-Thermal Energy,” Appl. Energy, 111, pp. 957–970. [CrossRef]
Garg, P. , Kumar, P. , and Srinivasan, K. , 2013, “ Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle for Concentrated Solar Power,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, 76, pp. 54–60. [CrossRef]
Dunham, M. T. , and Iverson, B. D. , 2014, “ High-Efficiency Thermodynamic Power Cycles for Concentrated Solar Power Systems,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 30, pp. 758–770. [CrossRef]
Kolb, G. J. , 2011, “ An Evaluation of Possible Next-Generation High-Temperature Molten-Salt Power Towers,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2011-9320. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2014/ph241/dunham1/docs/119320.pdf
Romero, M. , Buck, R. , and Pacheco, J. E. , 2002, “ An Update on Solar Central Receiver Systems, Projects, and Technologies,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 98–108. [CrossRef]
Kolb, G. J. , Ho, C. K. , Mancini, T. R. , and Gary, J. A. , 2011, “ Power Tower Technology Roadmap and Cost Reduction Plan,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2011-2419. http://www.ezklein.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TowerRoadmap-track-changes-EZKleins-contribution.pdf
Garimella, S. V. , Singhal, V. , and Liu, D. , 2006, “ On-Chip Thermal Management With Microchannel Heat Sinks and Integrated Micropumps,” Proc. IEEE, 94(8), pp. 1534–1548. [CrossRef]
Fronk, B. M. , and Garimella, S. , 2011, “ Water-Coupled Carbon Dioxide Microchannel Gas Cooler for Heat Pump Water Heaters: Part I—Experiments,” Int. J. Refrig., 34(1), pp. 7–16. [CrossRef]
Fronk, B. M. , and Garimella, S. , 2011, “ Water-Coupled Carbon Dioxide Microchannel Gas Cooler for Heat Pump Water Heaters: Part II—Model Development and Validation,” Int. J. Refrig., 34(1), pp. 17–28. [CrossRef]
Khan, M. G. , and Fartaj, A. , 2011, “ A Review on Microchannel Heat Exchangers and Potential Applications,” Int. J. Energy Res., 35(7), pp. 553–582. [CrossRef]
L'Estrange, T. , Truong, E. , Rasouli, E. , Narayanan, V. , Rymal, C. , Apte, S. , and Drost, K. , 2015, “ High Flux Microscale Solar Thermal Receiver for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles,” ASME Paper No. ICNMM2015-48233.
Rymal, C. , Apte, A. V. , Narayanan, V. , and Drost, K. , 2013, “ Numerical Design of a High-Flux Microchannel Solar Receiver,” ASME Paper No. ES2013-18353.
Schenk, R. , Hessel, V. , Hofmann, C. , Kiss, J. , Löwe, H. , and Ziogas, A. , 2004, “ Numbering-Up of Micro Devices: A First Liquid-Flow Splitting Unit,” Chem. Eng. J., 101(1–3), pp. 421–429. [CrossRef]
Yao, Z. , Wang, Z. , Lu, Z. , and Wei, X. , 2009, “ Modeling and Simulation of the Pioneer 1 MW Solar Thermal Central Receiver System in China,” Renewable Energy, 34(1), pp. 2437–2446. [CrossRef]
Yu, Q. , Wang, Z. , Xu, E. , Li, X. , and Guo, M. , 2012, “ Modeling and Dynamic Simulation of the Collector and Receiver System of 1 MWe DAHAN Solar Thermal Power Tower Plant,” Renewable Energy, 43(1), pp. 18–29. [CrossRef]
He, Y. L. , Cui, F. Q. , Cheng, Z. D. , Li, Z. Y. , and Tao, W. Q. , 2013, “ Numerical Simulation of Solar Radiation Transmission Process for the Solar Tower Power Plant: From the Heliostat Field to the Pressurized Volumetric Receiver,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 61(2), pp. 583–595. [CrossRef]
Fernández, P. , and Miller, F. J. , 2015, “ Performance Analysis and Preliminary Design Optimization of a Small Particle Heat Exchange Receiver for Solar Tower Power Plants,” Sol. Energy, 112, pp. 458–468. [CrossRef]
Garbrecht, O. , Al-Sibai, F. , Kneer, R. , and Wieghardt, K. , 2013, “ CFD-Simulation of a New Receiver Design for a Molten Salt Solar Power Tower,” Sol. Energy, 90, pp. 94–106. [CrossRef]
Rodríguez-Sánchez, M. R. , Marugan-Cruz, C. , Acosta-Iborra, A. , and Santana, D. , 2014, “ Comparison of Simplified Heat Transfer Models and CFD Simulations for Molten Salt External Receiver,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 73(1), pp. 993–1005. [CrossRef]
Besarati, S. M. , Yogi Goswami, D. , and Stefanakos, E. K. , 2015, “ Development of a Solar Receiver Based on Compact Heat Exchanger Technology for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 137(3), p. 031018. [CrossRef]
Haynes International, 2016, “ Haynes® 230® Alloy,” Haynes International, Inc., Kokomo, IN. http://haynesintl.com/docs/default-source/pdfs/new-alloy-brochures/high-temperature-alloys/230-brochure.pdf
Klein, S. A. , 2014, “ F-Chart Software,” EES, Madison, WI.
Bergman, T. , Lavine, A. , Incropera, F. , and Dewitt, D. , 2011, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, Wiley, Holboken, NJ.
Churchill, S. W. , and Chu, H. H. S. , 1975, “ Correlating Equations for Laminar and Turbulent Free Convection From a Vertical Plate,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 18(11), pp. 1323–1329. [CrossRef]
Span, R. , and Wagner, W. , 1996, “ A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region From the Triple-Point Temperature of 1100 K at Pressure up to 800 MPa,” J. Phys Chem. Ref. Data, 25(6), pp. 1509–1596. [CrossRef]
Koşar, A. , Mishra, C. , and Peles, Y. , 2005, “ Laminar Flow Across a Bank of Low Aspect Ratio Micro Pin Fins,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 127(3), pp. 419–430. [CrossRef]
Qu, W. , and Siu-Ho, A. , 2008, “ Liquid Single-Phase Flow in an Array of Micro-Pin-Fins—Part I: Heat Transfer Characteristics,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 130(12), p. 122402. [CrossRef]
Zukauskas, A. , 1972, “ Heat Transfer From Tubes in Cross Flow,” Adv. Heat Transfer, 8, pp. 93–160.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of numbering-up concept of multiple unit cells in parallel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

One-dimensional thermal network resistance model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two-dimensional thermal network resistance model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Calculated thermal efficiency of 2 cm × 2 cm unit cell compared with the data of L'Estrange et al. [15] with a fluid inlet temperature of 400 °C, outlet temperature of 650 °C, pressure of 83.5 bar, and absorptivity of 0.83

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Calculated thermal efficiency of 1 m × 0.08 m unit cell as a function of incident solar flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Surface temperature and contribution of convection and reradiation to total unit cell (1 m × 0.08 m) heat loss as a function of incident solar flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of a thermal efficiency and sCO2 convective heat transfer coefficient for a scaled module (single large unit cell) and numbered-up module (multiple parallel unit cells) with a total heat transfer area of 0.96 m2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Schematic of the conceptual central receiver surface area tuned to a solar flux profile of a specific heliostat field

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Schematic of top view of the receiver cross section for (a) receiver design #1 (baseline), (b) receiver design #2, and (c) receiver design #3, each with ten modules in height and a total of 250 individual 0.96 m2 modules

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Module thermal efficiency versus compass direction for the baseline receiver design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of incident energy and thermal energy transferred to sCO2 for three central receiver designs considered




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In