Research Papers

Modeling of a Solar Receiver for Superheating Sulfuric Acid

[+] Author and Article Information
Justin L. Lapp

German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Cologne 51147, Germany
e-mail: Justin.Lapp@dlr.de

Alejandro Guerra-Niehoff

German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Cologne 51147, Germany
e-mail: Alejandro.Guerra@dlr.de

Hans-Peter Streber

German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Cologne 51147, Germany
e-mail: Hans-Peter.Streber@dlr.de

Dennis Thomey

German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Cologne 51147, Germany
e-mail: Dennis.Thomey@dlr.de

Martin Roeb

German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Cologne 51147, Germany
e-mail: Martin.Roeb@dlr.de

Christian Sattler

German Aerospace Center,
Linder Höhe,
Cologne 51147, Germany
e-mail: Christian.Sattler@dlr.de

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received August 27, 2015; final manuscript received April 8, 2016; published online June 14, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Wojciech Lipinski.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(4), 041013 (Jun 14, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1278; doi: 10.1115/1.4033594 History: Received August 27, 2015; Revised April 08, 2016

A volumetric solar receiver for superheating evaporated sulfuric acid is developed as part of a 100 kW pilot plant for the hybrid sulfur (HyS) cycle. The receiver, which uses silicon carbide foam as a heat transfer medium, heats evaporated sulfuric acid using concentrated solar energy to temperatures of 1000 °C or greater, which are required for the downstream catalytic reaction to split sulfur trioxide into oxygen and sulfur dioxide. Multiple parallel approaches for modeling and analysis of the receiver are used to design the prototype. Focused numerical modeling and thermodynamic analysis are applied to answer individual design and performance questions. Numerical simulations focused on fluid flow are used to determine the best arrangement of inlets, while thermodynamic analysis is used to evaluate the optimal dimensions and operating parameters. Finally, a numerical fluid mechanics and heat transfer model is used to predict the temperature field within the receiver. Important lessons from the modeling efforts are given, and their impacts on the design of a prototype are discussed.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Brecher, L. E. , Spewock, S. , and Warde, C. J. , 1977, “ The Westinghouse Sulfur Cycle for the Thermochemical Decomposition of Water,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2(1), pp. 7–15. [CrossRef]
Kolb, G. J. , and Diver, R. B. , 2008, “ Screening Analysis of Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Concepts,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2008-1900.
Broggi, A. , Langenkamp, H. , Mertel, G. , and van Velzen, D. , 1982, “ Decomposition of Sulfuric Acid by the Cristina Process: A Status Report,” Hydrogen Energy Progress IV: Proceedings of the World Hydrogen Energy Conference IV, Pasadena, CA, June 13–17, T. N. Veziroglu , W. D. Van Vorst , and J. H. Kelley , Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 611–621.
Kolb, G. , Diver, R. B. , and Siegel, N. , 2007, “ Central-Station Solar Hydrogen Power Plant,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 129(2), pp. 179–183. [CrossRef]
General Atomics, 1985, “ Decomposition of Sulfuric Acid Using Solar Thermal Energy,” Report No. GA-A17573.
General Atomics, 1986, “ High-Pressure Catalytic Metal Reactor in a Simulated Solar Central Receiver,” Technical Report No. GA-A18285.
Roeb, M. , Monnerie, N. , Houaijia, A. , Thomey, D. , and Sattler, C. , 2013, “ Solar Thermal Water Splitting,” Renewable Hydrogen Technologies, L. M. Gandía , G. Arzamendi , and P. M. Diéguez , eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomey, D. , de Oliveira, L. , Säck, J. P. , Roeb, M. , and Sattler, C. , 2012, “ Development and Test of a Solar Reactor for Decomposition of Sulphuric Acid in Thermochemical Hydrogen Production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(21), pp. 16615–16622. [CrossRef]
Ávila-Marín, A. L. , 2011 “ Volumetric Receivers in Solar Thermal Power Plants With Central Receiver System Technology: A Review,” Sol. Energy, 85(5), pp. 891–910. [CrossRef]
Veeraragavan, A. , Lenert, A. , Yilbas, B. , Al-Dini, S. , and Wang, E. N. , 2012, “ Analytical Model for the Design of Volumetric Solar Flow Receivers,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 55(4), pp. 556–564. [CrossRef]
Ahlbrink, N. , Belhomme, B. , and Pitz-Paal, R. , 2009, “ Modeling and Simulation of a Solar Tower Power Plant With Open Volumetric Air Receiver,” 7th Modelica Conference, Como, Italy, Sept. 20–22, pp. 685–693.
Skocypec, R. D. , Boehm, R. F. , and Chavez, J. M. , 1988, “ Heat Transfer Modeling of the IEA/SSPS Volumetric Receiver,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 111(2), pp. 138–143. [CrossRef]
Muir, J. F. , Hogan, R. E. , Skocypec, R. D. , and Buck, R. , 1993, “ The CAESAR Project: Experimental and Modeling Investigations of Methane Reforming in a Catalytically Enhanced Solar Absorption Receiver on a Parabolic Dish,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND92-2131.
Wu, Z. , Caliot, C. , Flamant, G. , and Wang, Z. , 2011, “ Coupled Radiation and Flow Modeling in Ceramic Foam Volumetric Solar Air Receivers,” Sol. Energy, 85(9), pp. 2374–2385. [CrossRef]
Villafán-Vidales, H. I. , Abanades, S. , Caliot, C. , and Romero-Paredes, H. , 2011, “ Heat Transfer Simulation in a Thermochemical Solar Reactor Based on a Volumetric Porous Receiver,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 31(16), pp. 3377–3386. [CrossRef]
Hischier, I. , Hess, D. , Lipiński, W. , Modest, M. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2010, “ Heat Transfer Analysis of a Novel Pressurized Air Receiver for Concentrated Solar Power Via Combined Cycles,” ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., 1(4), p. 041002. [CrossRef]
He, Y. L. , Cheng, Z. D. , Cui, F. Q. , Li, Y. , and Li, D. , 2012, “ Numerical Investigations on a Pressurized Volumetric Receiver: Solar Concentrating and Collecting Modeling,” Renewable Energy, 44, pp. 368–379. [CrossRef]
Crocker, A. , and Miller, F. , 2011, “ Coupled Fluid Flow and Radiative Modeling for a Small Particle Solar Receiver,” AIAA Paper No. 2011-5902.
Becker, M. , Fend, Th. , Hoffschmidt, B. , Pitz-Paal, R. , Reutter, O. , Stamatov, V. , Steven, M. , and Trimis, D. , 2005, “ Theoretical and Numerical Investigation of Flow Stability in Porous Materials Applied as Volumetric Solar Receivers,” Sol. Energy, 80(10), pp. 1241–1248. [CrossRef]
Roeb, M. , Thomey, D. , Graf, D. , Sattler, C. , Poitou, S. , Pra, F. D. B. , Tochon, P. , Mansilla, C. C. , Robin, J. C. , LeNaour, F. , Allen, R. W. K. , Elder, R. H. , Atkin, I. , Karagiannakis, G. , Agrafiotis, C. , Konstandopoulos, A. G. , Musella, M. , Hähner, P. , Giaconia, A. , Sau, S. , Tarquini, P. , Haussener, S. , Steinfeld, A. , Martinez, S. , Canadas, I. , Orden, A. , Ferrato, M. , Hinkley, J. T. , Lahoda, E. , and Wong, B. , 2011, “ Hycycles: A Project on Nuclear and Solar Hydrogen Production by Sulphur-Based Thermochemical Cycles,” Int. J. Nucl. Hydrogen Prod. Appl., 2(3), pp. 202–226.
Noglik, A. , Roeb, M. , Sattler, C. , and Pitz-Paal, R. , 2011, “ Modeling of a Solar Receiver-Reactor for Sulfur-Based Thermochemical Cycles for Hydrogen Generation,” Int. J. Energy Res., 35(5), pp. 449–458. [CrossRef]
Haussener, S. , Thomey, D. , Roeb, M. , and Steinfeld, A. , 2012, “ Multi-Scale Modeling of a Solar Reactor for the High-Temperature Step of a Sulphur-Iodine-Based Water Splitting Cycle,” ASME Paper No. HT2012-58323.
Noglik, A. , Roeb, M. , Sattler, C. , and Pitz-Paal, R. , 2011, “ Numerical Analysis of Operation Conditions and Design Aspects of a Sulfur Trioxide Decomposer for Solar Energy Conversion,” Int. J. Energy Res., 36(6), pp. 798–808. [CrossRef]
Schwan, S. P. , 2014, “ Strömungssimulation Solarreceiver. Optimierung der Einströmung in den Solarreceiver des Sol2Hy2-Projekts,” Master's project report, Cologne University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany.
Fend, T. , Hoffschmidt, B. , Pitz-Paal, R. , Reutter, O. , and Rietbrock, P. , 2002, “ Porous Materials as Open Volumetric Solar Receivers: Experimental Determination of Thermophysical Properties,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 823–833.
Chase, M. W. , 1998, “ NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Mongraph 9.
Modest, M. F. , 2003, Radiative Heat Transfer, 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Heraeus, “ Standard Optics Information: HOQ 310,” Last accessed May 12, 2014, http://optics.heraeus-quarzglas.com/media/webmedia_local/datenbltter/O434M_HOQ.pdf
Liessmann, G. , Schmidt, W. , and Reiffarth, S. , 1995, Data Compilation of the Sächsische Olefinwerke, Sächsische Olefinwerke AG, Böhlen, Germany.
Reid, R. C. , Prausnitz, J. M. , and Sherwood, T. K. , 1987, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wassiljewa, A. , 1904, “ Wärmeleitung in Gasgemischen,” Physik Z, 5(22), pp. 737–742.
Wilke, C. R. , 1950, “ A Viscosity Equation for Gas Mixtures,” J. Chem. Phys., 18(4), pp. 517–519. [CrossRef]
Jang, B.-K. , and Sakka, Y. , 2007, “ Thermophysical Properties of Porous SiC Ceramics Fabricated by Pressureless Sintering,” Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 8(7–8), pp. 655–659. [CrossRef]
Patnaik, P. , 2002, Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Haussener, S. , 2010, “ Tomography-Based Determination of Effective Heat and Mass Transport Properties of Complex Multi-Phase Media,” Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Pilot-plant arrangement for the decomposition step of the HyS cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Preliminary receiver design rendering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Sample results from isothermal fluid flow modeling of the receiver, showing resulting (a) velocity streamlines, (b) relative (to average) axial fluid velocity entering absorber, and (c) relative axial velocity on a centerline slice through the absorber. Cases shown are for (1) single tangential gas inlet of 40 mm diameter and (2) single radial gas inlet of 80 mm diameter. Results are from Ref. [24].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Solved fluid and solid temperatures along absorber axial direction for 1 l min−1 acid mixture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of varied solar flux on system temperatures. Boxgiven to show operating window based on fluid outlet temperatures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Parametric study of receiver diameter, resulting in varied component temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation in receiver component temperatures with varied values of δCSP, the fraction of incident radiation on the absorber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Analysis domain with key dimensions, given in centimeter. The inlet pipe enters the receiver radially.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Velocity vectors, shaded by temperature in Kelvin, showing flow through the receiver for the case of uniform solar absorption

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Fluid temperature contours in Kelvin, for cases of (a) uniform absorber heat source, (b) nonuniform parabolic heat source, and (c) nonuniform linear heat source

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Fluid temperature contours in Kelvin, for varying gas flow rates, corresponding to (a) 0.5, (b) 1.0, and (c) 1.5 l min−1 liquid flow rate. Note that temperature scales are not identical.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Average gas temperatures measured at the receiver outlet for varying liquid acid mixture flow rates and power absorbed by the silicon carbide absorber




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In