0
Research Papers

Geometrical Parameters Influencing the Aerodynamic Efficiency of a Small-Scale Self-Pitch High-Solidity VAWT

[+] Author and Article Information
Carlos M. Xisto

Division of Fluid Dynamics,
Department of Applied Mechanics,
Chalmers University of Technology,
Gothenburg SE-41296, Sweden
e-mail: carlos.xisto@chalmers.se

José C. Páscoa

Departamento de Engenharia Electromecânica,
Universidade da Beira Interior,
Covilhã 6200, Portugal
e-mail: pascoa@ubi.pt

Michele Trancossi

Department of Engineering and Mathematics,
Sheffield Hallam University,
Sheffield, South Yorkshire S1 1WB, UK
e-mail: m.trancossi@shu.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received April 16, 2015; final manuscript received February 12, 2016; published online March 9, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Yves Gagnon.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(3), 031006 (Mar 09, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1096; doi: 10.1115/1.4032794 History: Received April 16, 2015; Revised February 12, 2016

In this paper, four key design parameters with a strong influence on the performance of a high-solidity variable pitch vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) operating at low tip-speed-ratio (TSR) are addressed. To this aim, a numerical approach, based on a finite-volume discretization of two-dimensional (2D) unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) equations, on a multiple sliding mesh, is proposed and validated against experimental data. The self-pitch VAWT design is based on a straight-blade Darrieus wind turbine with blades that are allowed to pitch around a feathering axis, which is also parallel to the axis of rotation. The pitch angle amplitude and periodic variation are dynamically controlled by a four-bar linkage system. We only consider the efficiency at low and intermediate TSR; therefore, the pitch amplitude is chosen to be a sinusoidal function with a considerable amplitude. The results of this parametric analysis will contribute to define the guidelines for building a full-size prototype of a small-scale wind turbine of increased efficiency.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Eriksson, S. , Bernhoff, H. , and Leijon, M. , 2008, “ Evaluation of Different Turbine Concepts for Wind Power,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 12(5), pp. 1419–1434. [CrossRef]
Pope, K. , Dincer, I. , and Naterer, G. , 2010, “ Energy and Exergy Efficiency Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Axis Wind Turbines,” Renewable Energy, 35(9), pp. 2102–2113. [CrossRef]
Xisto, C. M. , Pascoa, J. C. , Leger, J. , and Trancossi, M. , 2014, “ Wind Energy Production Using an Optimized Variable Pitch Vertical Axis Rotor,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-38966.
Benedict, M. , Lakshminarayan, V. , Pino, J. , and Chopra, I. , 2015, “ Aerodynamics of a Small-Scale Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine With Dynamic Blade Pitching,” AIAA J., (in press).
Madsen, H. , and Lundgren, K. , 1980, The Voith-Schneider Wind Turbine: Some Theoretical and Experimental Results on the Aerodynamics of the Voith-Schneider Wind Turbine, Institute of Industrial Constructions and Energy Technology, Aalborg University Centre, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pawsey, N. C. K. , 2002, “ Development and Evaluation of Passive Variable-Pitch Vertical Axis Wind Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
Duquette, M. M. , and Visser, K. D. , 2003, “ Numerical Implications of Solidity and Blade Number on Rotor Performance of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 125(4), pp. 425–432. [CrossRef]
Mohamed, M. , 2012, “ Performance Investigation of H-Rotor Darrieus Turbine With New Airfoil Shapes,” Energy, 47(1), pp. 522–530. [CrossRef]
Roh, S.-C. , and Kang, S.-H. , 2013, “ Effects of a Blade Profile, the Reynolds Number, and the Solidity on the Performance of a Straight Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 27(11), pp. 3299–3307. [CrossRef]
Chougule, P. , and Nielsen, S. , 2014, “ Overview and Design of Self-Acting Pitch Control Mechanism for Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Using Multi Body Simulation Approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 524(1), p. 012055.
Ahmadi-Baloutaki, M. , Carriveau, R. , and Ting, D. S.-K. , 2014, “ Straight-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Rotor Design Guide Based on Aerodynamic Performance and Loading Analysis,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 228(7), pp. 742–759. [CrossRef]
Tjiu, W. , Marnoto, T. , Mat, S. , Ruslan, M. H. , and Sopian, K. , 2015, “ Darrieus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine for Power Generation I: Assessment of Darrieus {VAWT} Configurations,” Renewable Energy, 75, pp. 50–67. [CrossRef]
Leger, J. A. , Páscoa, J. C. , and Xisto, C. M. , 2015, “ Analytical Modeling of a Cyclorotor in Hovering State,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 229(12), pp. 2163–2177. [CrossRef]
Hwang, S. , Min, Y. , Lee, H. , and Kim, J. , 2008, “ Development of a Four-Rotor Cyclocopter,” J. Aircr., 45(6), pp. 2151–2157. [CrossRef]
Benedict, M. , 2010, “ Fundamental Understanding of the Cycloidal-Rotor Concept for Micro Air Vehicle Applications,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Benedict, M. , Ramasamy, M. , and Chopra, I. , 2010, “ Improving the Aerodynamic Performance of Micro-Air-Vehicle-Scale Cycloidal Rotor: An Experimental Approach,” J. Aircr., 47(4), pp. 1117–1125. [CrossRef]
Benedict, M. , Jarugumilli, T. , and Chopra, I. , 2013, “ Effect of Rotor Geometry and Blade Kinematics on Cycloidal Rotor Hover Performance,” J. Aircr., 50(5), pp. 1340–1352. [CrossRef]
Xisto, C. M. , Páscoa, J. C. , Leger, J. A. , Masarati, P. , Quaranta, G. , Morandini, M. , Gagnon, L. , Schwaiger, M. , and Wills, D. , 2014, “ Numerical Modelling of Geometrical Effects in the Performance of a Cycloidal Rotor,” 11th World Conference on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI), Barcelona, Spain, July 20-25, p. 1848.
ANSYS, “ ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide,” ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Xisto, C. M. , Páscoa, J. C. , Abdollahzadeh, M. , Leger, J. A. , Schwaiger, M. , and Wills, D. , 2014, “ PECyT—Plasma Enhanced Cycloidal Thruster,” 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, July 28–30, AIAA Paper No. 2014-3854.
Xisto, C. M. , Pascoa, J. C. , and Leger, J. , 2014, “ Cycloidal Rotor Propulsion System With Plasma Enhanced Aerodynamics,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-38291.
Gagnon, L. , Quaranta, G. , Morandini, M. , Masarati, P. , Lanz, M. , Xisto, C. M. , and Pascoa, J. C. , 2014, “ Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Analysis of a Cycloidal Rotor,” AIAA Paper No. 2014-2450.
Trancossi, M. , Dumas, A. , Xisto, C. M. , Páscoa, J. C. , and Andrisani, A. , 2014, “ Roto-Cycloid Propelled Airship Dimensioning and Energetic Equilibrium,” SAE Paper No. 2014-01-2107.
Hansen, M. O. , and Sørerensen, D. N. , 2001, “ CFD Model for Vertical Axis Wind Turbine,” European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition (EWEC '01), Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2–7.
Edwards, J. M. , Angelo Danao, L. , and Howell, R. J. , 2012, “ Novel Experimental Power Curve Determination and Computational Methods for the Performance Analysis of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 134(3), p. 031008. [CrossRef]
Ferreira, C. J. S. , Bijl, H. , van Bussel, G. , and van Kuik, G. , 2007, “ Simulating Dynamic Stall in a 2D VAWT: Modeling Strategy, Verification and Validation With Particle Image Velocimetry Data,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 75(1), p. 012023.
Ferreira, C. J. S. A. , van Zuijlen, A. , Bijl, H. , van Bussel, G. , and van Kuik, G. , 2010, “ Simulating Dynamic Stall in a Two-Dimensional Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine: Verification and Validation With Particle Image Velocimetry Data,” Wind Energy, 13(1), pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
Ferreira, C. J. S. A. , van Bussel, G. J. W. , van Kuik, G. A. M. , and Scarano, F. , 2011, “ On the Use of Velocity Data for Load Estimation of a VAWT in Dynamic Stall,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 133(1), p. 011006. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R. , and Rumsey, C. L. , 2007, “ Effective Inflow Conditions for Turbulence Models in Aerodynamic Calculations,” AIAA J., 45(10), pp. 2544–2553. [CrossRef]
Sanyer, W. , 2011, “ The Development of a Wind Turbine for Residential Use,” Master's thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Goett, H. J. , and Bullivant, W. K. , 1938, “ Tests of NAC A 0009, 0012, and 0018 Airfoils in the Full-Scale Tunnel,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, NACA Technical Report No. 647.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Variable pitch VAWT with a four-bar linkage pitching system and (b) comparison between the velocity vectors at low TSR between a variable and fixed pitch VAWT. Vt=Ω R is the tip-speed velocity, and VR=Vwind2+Vt2 is the resultant velocity on the blade. One can observe that, in the backward region of the VAWT (Ψ=270 deg), the angle of attack, α, is higher for the fixed pitch VAWT (α1>α2).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two-dimensional numerical domain used for computing the IAT21-L3 rotor test case, a close-up of the rotor and blade grid is also displayed. The grid is composed by three circular zones, which are separated by sliding-mesh interfaces. The same numerical configuration and boundary conditions are used throughout this paper.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The results obtained for the validation test case in  log10−log10 plots: (a) variation of thrust with rotational speed and (b) variation of power with rotational speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The results obtained for the airfoil thickness: (a) power coefficient variation with TSR and (b) power coefficient variation with airfoil thickness for different TSRs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The results obtained for the variation of the number of blades: (a) power coefficient variation with TSR and (b) power coefficient variation with the number of blades for different TSRs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The results obtained for the variation of blade chord length: (a) power coefficient variation with TSR and (b) power coefficient variation with the blade chord length for different TSRs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The results obtained for variation of the pitching axis location: (a) power coefficient variation with TSR and (b) power coefficient variation with the pitching axis location for different TSRs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison between the proposed and conventional design: (a) power coefficient variation with TSR (F—fixed pitch and V—variable pitch, for θ0 = 5 deg, 15 deg, and 30 deg) and (b) power coefficient variation with the azimuthal position of one blade for λ = 0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Instantaneous contour plots of velocity magnitude (λ = 0.5) computed after five revolutions in the (a) proposed design (c = 0.25 m; N = 4; NACA0018; x′/c= 0.35; and θ0 = 30 deg) and (b) conventional rotor with a fixed pitch of 5 deg. Instantaneous contour plots for the nondimensional vorticity, ωz*=ωz c/Uwind, with super imposed streamlines: (c) proposed design and (d) conventional rotor.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In