0
Research Papers

S-Ethane Brayton Power Conversion Systems for Concentrated Solar Power Plant

[+] Author and Article Information
Luis Coco Enríquez, Javier Muñoz-Antón

Department of Energy Engineering,
Technical University of Madrid—UPM,
Madrid 28040, Spain

José María Martínez-Val Peñalosa

Professor
Department of Energy Engineering,
Technical University of Madrid—UPM,
Madrid 28040, Spain

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received June 12, 2015; final manuscript received November 23, 2015; published online December 29, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Mary Jane Hale.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 138(1), 011012 (Dec 29, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: SOL-15-1180; doi: 10.1115/1.4032143 History: Received June 12, 2015; Revised November 23, 2015

The objective of this investigation is the comparison between supercritical ethane (s-ethane, C2H6) and supercritical carbon dioxide (s-CO2) Brayton power cycles for line-focusing concentrated solar power plants (CSP). In this study, CSP are analyzed with linear solar collectors (parabolic trough (PTC) or linear Fresnel (LF)), direct molten salt (MS), or direct steam generation (DSG) as heat transfer fluids (HTF), and four supercritical Brayton power cycles configurations: simple Brayton cycle (SB), recompression cycle (RC), partial cooling with recompression cycle (PCRC), and recompression with main compression intercooling cycle (RCMCI). All Brayton power cycles were assessed with two working fluids: s-CO2 and s-ethane. As a main result, we confirmed that s-ethane Brayton power cycles provide better net plant performance than s-CO2 cycles for turbine inlet temperatures (TITs) from 300 °C to 550 °C. As an example, the s-ethane RCMCI plant configuration net efficiency is ∼42.11% for TIT = 400 °C, and with s-CO2 the plant performance is ∼40%. The CSP Brayton power plants were also compared with another state-of-the-art CSP with DSG in linear solar collectors and a subcritical water Rankine power cycle with direct reheating (DRH), and a maximum plant performance between ∼40% and 41% (TIT = 550 °C).

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kolb, G. J. , 2011, “ An Evaluation of Possible Next-Generation High Temperature Molten-Salt Power Towers,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2011-9320.
Kelly, B. , 2010, “ Advanced Thermal Storage for Central Receivers With Supercritical Coolants,” Abengoa Solar, Madrid, Spain, Report No. DE-FG36-08GO18149.
Pacheco, J. E. , Wolf, T. , and Muley, N. , 2013, “ Incorporating Supercritical Steam Turbines Into Advanced Molten-Salt Power Tower Plants: Feasibility and Performance,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAN2013-1960.
Coco-Enríquez, L. , Muñoz-Antón, J. , and Martínez-Val, J. M. , 2014, “ Supercritical Steam Power Cycle for Line-Focus Solar Power Plants,” 4th International Conference on Nuclear and Renewable Energy Resources NURER, Antalya, Turkey, Oct. 26–29.
Perez, J. A. , Driscoll, M. , and Hejzlar, P. , 2008, “ Evaluation of Ethane as a Power Conversion System Working Fluid for Fast Reactors,” B.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Rovira, A. , Muñoz-Anton, J. , Montes, M. J. , and Martinez-Val, J. M. , 2013, “ Optimization of Brayton Cycles for Low-to-Moderate Grade Thermal Energy Sources,” Energy, 55, pp. 403–416. [CrossRef]
Rovira, A. , Rubbia, C. , Valdés, M. , and Martínez-Val, J. M. , 2014, “ Thermodynamic Cycles Optimised for Medium Enthalpy Units of Concentrating Solar Power,” Energy, 67, pp. 176–185. [CrossRef]
Angelino, G. , 1967, “ Perspectives for the Liquid Phase Compression Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 89(2), pp. 229–237. [CrossRef]
Petr, V. , and Kolovratnik, M. , 1997, “ A Study on Application of a Closed Cycle COB 2B Gas Turbine in Power Engineering,” Department of Fluid Dynamics and Power Engineering, Division of Power Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, Report No. Z-523/97.
Dostal, V. , Driscoll, M. J. , and Hejzlar, P. , 2004, “ A Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Report No. MIT-ANP-TR-100.
Dostal, V. , Hejzlar, P. , and Driscoll, M. J. , 2006, “ The Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle: Comparison to Other Advanced Power Cycles,” Nucl. Tech., 154(3), pp. 283–301. [CrossRef]
Sienicki, J. J. , and Moisseytsev, A. , 2014, “ Recent Developments in s-CO2 Cycle Dynamic Modeling and Analysis at ANL,” 4th International Symposium—Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 9–10.
Rahner, K. D. , 2014, “ s-CO2 Brayton Loop Transient Modeling,” 4th International Symposium—Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 9–10.
Wright, S. A. , Radel, R. F. , Vernon, M. E. , Rochau, G. E. , and Pickard, P. S. , 2010, “ Operation and Analysis of a Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle,” Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2010-0171.
Turchi, C. S. , and Dyreby, J. , 2012, “ Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Configurations for Use in Concentrating Solar Power Systems,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68932.
Seidel, W. , 2010, “ Model Development and Annual Simulation of the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle for Concentrating Solar Power Applications,” Master's thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Gavic, D. , 2012, “ Investigation of Water, Air, and Hybrid Cooling for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycles,” Master's thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Dyreby, J. , 2014, “ Modeling the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle With Recompression,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Turchi, C. S. , Ma, Z. , Neises, T. W. , and Wagner, M. J. , 2013, “ Thermodynamic Study of Advanced Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles for Concentrating Solar Power Systems,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 135(4), p. 041007. [CrossRef]
Neises, T. W. , and Turchi, C. S. , 2014, “ Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles: Design Considerations for Concentrating Solar Power,” 4th International Symposium—Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 9–10.
Roine, A. , 2002, Outokumpu HSC Chemistry for Windows: Chemical Reactions and Equilibrium Software With Extensive Thermodynamical Database, Outokumpu Research Oy, Pori, Finland, Report No. 02103-ORC-T.
Perez, J. A. , 2008, “ Evaluation of Ethane as a Power Conversion System Working Fluid for Fast Reactors,” B.S. thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Span, R. , and Wagner, W. , 1996, “ A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region From the Triple-Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 25(6), pp. 1509–1596. [CrossRef]
Buecker, D. , and Wagner, W. , 2006, “ A Reference Equation of State for the Thermodynamic Properties of Ethane for Temperatures From the Melting Line to 675 K and Pressures up to 900 MPa,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 35(1), pp. 205–266. [CrossRef]
Halimi, B. , and Suh, K. Y. , 2012, “ Computational Analysis of Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle Power Conversion System for Fusion Reactor,” Energy Convers. Manage., 63, pp. 38–43. [CrossRef]
Ericson, J. , 1884, “ The Sun Motor and the Sun's Temperature,” Nature, 29(740), pp. 217–223. [CrossRef]
Zarza, E. , Valenzuela, L. , Leon, J. , Weyers, H. D. , Eickhoff, M. , Eck, M. , and Hennecke, K. , 2002, “ The DISS Project: Direct Steam Generation in Parabolic Trough Systems. Operation and Maintenance Experience and Update on Project Status,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 126–133. [CrossRef]
Zarza, E. , Rojas, M. E. , González, L. , Caballero, J. M. , and Rueda, F. , 2006, “ INDITEP: The First Pre-Commercial DSG Solar Power Plant,” Sol. Energy J., 80(10), pp. 1270–1276. [CrossRef]
Eck, M. , Benz, N. , Feldhoff, J. F. , Gilon, Y. , Hacker, Z. , Müller, T. , Riffelmann, K.-J. , Silmy, K. , and Tislaric, D. , 2008, “ The Potential of Direct Steam Generation in Parabolic Troughs—Results of the German Project DIVA,” 14th International Symposium on Concentrated Solar Power and Chemical Energy Technologies, Las Vegas, NV, Mar. 4–7.
Bernhard, R. , Laabs, H. J. , de Lalaing, J. , Eck, M. , Eickhoff, M. , Pottler, K. , Morin, G. , Heimsath, A. , Georg, A. , and Häberle, A. , 2008, “ Linear Fresnel Collector Demonstration on the PSA. Part I—Design, Construction and Quality Control,” 14th International SolarPACES Symposium, Las Vegas, NV, Mar. 3–7.
Bernhard, R. , Lalaing, J. , Kistner, R. , Eck, M. , Eickhoff, M. , Feldhoff, J. F. , Heimsath, A. , Hülsey, H. , and Morin, G. , 2009, “ Linear Fresnel Collector Demonstration at the PSA—Operation and Investigation,” 15th International SolarPACES Symposium, Berlin, Germany, Sept. 14–18.
Krüger, D. , Krüger, J. , Pandian, Y. , O'Connell, B. , Feldhoff, J. F. , Karthikeyan, R. , Hempel, S. , Muniasamy, K. , Hirsch, T. , Eickhoff, M. , and Hennecke, K. , 2012, “ Experiences With Direct Steam Generation at the Kanchanaburi Solar Thermal Power Plant,” 18th SolarPACES Conference, Marrakech, Morocco, Sept. 11–14.
Khenissi, A. , 2014, “ Return of Experience on Transient Behaviour at the DSG Solar Thermal Power Plant in Kanchanaburi Thailand,” SolarPaces 2014, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–19.
Feldhoff, J. F. , Eickhoff, M. , Karthikeyan, R. , Krüger, J. , Alonso, J. L. , and Meyer-Grünefeldt, M. , 2012, “ Concept Comparison and Test Facility Design for the Analysis of Direct Steam Generation in Once-Through Mode,” SolarPACES 2012 Conference, Marrakech, Morocco, Sept. 11–14.
Feldhoff, J. F. , Eickhoff, M. , Keller, L. , Alonso, J. L. , Meyer-Grünefeldt, M. , Valenzuela, L. , Pernpeintner, J. , and Hirsch, T. , 2013, “ Status and First Results of the DUKE Project—Component Qualification of New Receivers and Collectors,” SolarPaces 2013, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 17–20.
Feldhoff, J. F. , 2014, “ A Practical Guide to Solar Once-Through Boiler Control,” SolarPaces 2014, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–19.
Feldhoff, J. F. , 2014, “ Transient Models and Characteristics of One-Through Line Focus Systems,” SolarPaces 2014, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–19.
EPRI, 2008, “ Boiler Material for USC Pulverized Coal (PC) Plants,” G8 Cleaner Fossil Fuels Workshop, Electric Power Research Institute, Stu Dalto, Director, Generation, IEA Secretariat, Paris, France, Jan. 17–18.
Hirsch, T. , and Khenissi, A. , 2013, “ A Systematic Comparison on Power Block Efficiencies for CSP Plants With Direct Steam Generation,” SolarPaces 2013, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 17–20.
Coco-Enríquez, L. , Muñoz-Antón, J. , and Martínez-Val, J. M. , 2013, “ Innovations on Direct Steam Generation in Linear Fresnel Collectors,” SolarPaces 2013, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 17–20.
Maccari, A. , 2014, “ Archimede Solar Energy Molten Salt Parabolic Trough Demo Plant: A Step Ahead Towards the New Frontiers of CSP,” SolarPaces 2014, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–19.
Matino, F. , 2014, “ Molten Salt Receivers Operated on Parabolic Trough Demo Plant and in Laboratory Conditions,” SolarPaces 2014, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–19.
Morin, G. , 2014, “ Molten Salt as Heat Transfer Fluid in a Linear Fresnel Collector Commercial Application Backed by Demonstration,” SolarPaces 2014, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–19.
Coco-Enríquez, L. , Muñoz-Antón, J. , and Martínez-Val, J. M. , 2014, “ Integration Between Direct Steam Generation in Linear Solar Collectors and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Power cycles,” 4th International Conference on Nuclear and Renewable Energy Resources NURER, Antalya, Turkey, Oct. 26–29.
Turchi, C. , Bing, C. , and Lausten, M. , 2014, “ 10 MW Supercritical CO2 Turbine Test,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. CODE-EE0001589.
Burkholder, F. , and Kutscher, C. , 2009, “ Heat Loss Testing of Schott's 2008 PTR70 Parabolic Trough Receiver,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-550-45633.
Novatec Solar, 2013, “ SAM Linear Fresnel Solar Boiler Model, SAM Webinar,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory SAM Webinar 2013, July 23.
Dyreby, J. , Klein, S. , Nellis, G. , and Reindl, D. , 2014, “ Design Considerations for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycles With Recompression,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(10), p. 101701. [CrossRef]
Kwon, J. G. , Park, H. S. , Kim, T. H. , and Kim, M. H. , 2014, “ Numerical Analysis of a Fin Arrangement for an Optimal Design of Airfoil Fin PCHE,” 4th International Symposium—Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 9–10.
Carlson, M. D. , Kruizenga, A. K. , Schalansky, C. , and Fleming, D. F. , 2014, “ Sandia Progress on Advanced Heat Exchangers for S-CO2 Brayton Cycles,” 4th International Symposium—Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 9–10.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

MS SF with SB cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

MS SF partial cooling with recompression (PCRC)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

DSG SF with recirculation mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

DSG SF and subcritical Rankine power cycle with DRH

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Line-focusing solar power plant efficiency1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Line-focusing solar power plant efficiency (see footnote no. 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Line-focusing solar power plant efficiency2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Line-focusing solar power plant efficiency (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Line-focusing solar power plant efficiency (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Line-focusing solar power plant efficiency (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

SB s-ethane plant efficiency and pressure drop in power cycle HXs (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

RC s-ethane plant efficiency and pressure drop in power cycle HXs (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

PCRC s-ethane plant efficiency and pressure drop in power cycle HXs (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

RCMCI s-ethane plant efficiency and pressure drop in power cycle HXs (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

SB s-ethane plant net efficiency versus compressor inlet temperature (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

RC s-ethane plant net efficiency versus compressor inlet temperature (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

PCRC s-ethane plant net efficiency versus compressor inlet temperature (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

RCMCI s-ethane net efficiency and CIT (see footnote no. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

LF effective aperture area (m2) versus TIT, fixed 50 MWe net power output3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

PTC effective aperture area (m2) versus TIT, fixed 50 MWe net power output (see footnote no. 3)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In