0
Research Papers

Photovoltaic Technology Selection Using Analytical Hierarchical Process

[+] Author and Article Information
Shafique Muhammad

University of Engineering and Technology Taxila,
Taxila 47050, Pakistan
e-mail: shafiq2136@yahoo.com

Tahir Mahmood

Associate Professor
Department of Electrical and Electronics
University of Engineering and Technology Taxila,
Taxila 47050, Pakistan
e-mail: tahir010@yahoo.com

Muhammad Ahmad Choudhry

Professor
Dean of Electrical and Electronics Department,
University of Engineering and Technology Taxila,
Taxila 47050, Pakistan
e-mail: dr.ahmad@uettaxila.edu.pk

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received August 4, 2014; final manuscript received December 8, 2014; published online February 18, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Santiago Silvestre.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(2), 021018 (Apr 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: SOL-14-1224; doi: 10.1115/1.4029543 History: Received August 04, 2014; Revised December 08, 2014; Online February 18, 2015

While suffering from looming power crisis, high level of annual average solar irradiance makes the Pakistan ideally suitable for photovoltaic technologies. Deciding for a photovoltaic (PV) technology definitely requires a comprehensive research because output characteristics of each of the five major PV technologies depend on different technical as well as environmental characteristics (including solar irradiation, cell’s temperature, humidity, dust accumulation, angle of incidence, solar spectrum, wind’s speed, wind’s direction, and shading). Only one technology can perform best in a specific geographical location. In addition, before installing any PV generation facility, preferences of the decision-making authority and the attributes of the selected installation area must be considered. To address such a complex decision making problem, PV technology alternatives are ranked by use of an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) in which all the decision-making factors are arranged in a hierarchical tree showing their level of influence in the decision-making. A PV technology for installation is devised after a detailed pairwise comparison, for a specific location of Pakistan with respect to (w.r.t.) the government’s perspective. Useful guidelines with detailed comparison among five major PV technologies make this work a reference guide for the policy making institutes in particular and customer/entrepreneur in general.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Adnan, S., Khan, A. H., Haider, S., and Mahmood, R., 2012, “Solar Energy Potential in Pakistan,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 4(3), p. 032701. [CrossRef]
Kuthanazhi, V., and Rao, A. B., 2012, “Selection of Photovoltaic Modules for Off-Grid Rural Application Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process (ARP),” 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC, Austin, TX, pp. 002888–002893.
Zahid, M., and Rasul, G., 2011, “Thermal Classification of Pakistan,” Atmos. Clim. Sci., 1(4), pp. 206–213. [CrossRef]
Saaty, T. L., 2008, “Decision Making With the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1(1), pp. 83–98. [CrossRef]
RETScreen International, Clean Energy Decision Support Centre, 2005, “Photovoltaic Project Analysis,” Clean Energy Project Analysis RETScreen Engineering and Cases, 3rd ed., Minister of Natural Resources, Varennes, Quebec, Canada, pp. 171–216.
Mohring, H.-D., and Stellbogen, D., 2008, “Annual Energy Harvest of PV System-Advantages and Drawbacks of Different PV Technologies,” 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, Sept. 1–5, pp. 2781–2785.
Makrides, G., Zinsser, B., Norton, M., and Georghiou, G. E., 2012, “Performance of Photovoltaics Under Actual Operating Conditions,” Third Generation Photovoltaics, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. [CrossRef]
Ndiaye, A., Kébé, C. M. F., Ndiaye, P. A., Charki, A., Kobi, A., and Sambou, V., 2013, “Impact of Dust on the Photovoltaic (PV) Modules Characteristics After an Exposition Year in Sahelian Environment: The Case of Senegal,” Int. J. Phys. Sci., 8(21), pp. 1166–1173. [CrossRef]
Qasem, H., Betts, T. R., Müllejans, H., AlBusairi, H., and Gottschalg, R., 2011, “Dust Effect on PV Modules,” 7th Photovoltaic Science Application and Technology Conference, PVSAT-7 and Exhibition, Edinburgh, UK, Apr. 6–8.
Ettah, E. B., Udoimuk, A. B., Obiefuna, J. N., and Opara, F. E., 2012, “The Effect of Relative Humidity on the Efficiency of Solar Panels in Calabar, Nigeria,” Univers. J. Manage. Soc. Sci., 2(3), pp. 8–11.
Arvizu, D. E., 2013, Renewable Energy: Capturing the Potential, World Future Energy Summit Abu Dhabi, NREL U.S. Department of Energy.
IEA-ETSAP and IRENA, “Solar Photovoltaics-Technology Brief,” Accessed Jan. 2013, http://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/IRENA-ETSAP%20Tech%20Brief%20E11%20Solar %20PV.pdf
Chu, Y., 2011, “Review and Comparison of Different Solar Energy Technologies,” Global Energy Network Institute (GENI), San Diego, CA.
Marigo, N., Foxon, T. J., and Pearson, P. J., 2011, “Comparing Innovation Systems for Solar Photovoltaics in the United Kingdom and in China,” Imperial Centre for Energy Policy and Technology (ICEPT).
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2012, “Solar Photovoltaics,” Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series, Volume 1: Power Sector.
Masson, G., Latour, M., Rekinger, M., Theologitis, I.-T., and Papoutsi, M., Global Market Outlook for Photovoltaics 2013-2017, European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA).
Doni, A., Dughiero, F., and Lorenzoni, A., 2010, “A Comparison Between Thin Film and C-Si PV Technologies for MW Size Applications,” 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC, Honolulu, HI, June 20–25, pp. 002380–002385. [CrossRef]
McDonald, N. C., and Pearce, J. M., 2010, “Producer Responsibility and Recycling Solar Photovoltaic Modules,” Energy Policy, 38(11), pp. 7041–7047. [CrossRef]
Jordan, D. C., and Kurtz, S. R., 2013, “Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—An Analytical Review,” Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl., 21(1), pp. 12–29. [CrossRef]
Coyle, G., 2011, “The Not-So-Green Renewable Energy: Preventing Waste Disposal of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Panels,” Golden Gate Univ. Environ. Law J. 329, 4(2), pp. 1–33.
Fthenakis, V. M., 2003, “Overview of Potential Hazards,” Practical Handbook of Photovoltaics: Fundamentals and Applications, Elsevier Advanced Technologies, UK.
Zielnik, A., 2013, “Validating Photovoltaic Module Reliability Tests,” Solar America Board for Codes and Standards (SoABCS).
“Solar Panel Manufacturers,” Accessed Nov. 15, 2013. Available at: http://www.enfsolar.com/directory/panel
“Solar Panels China,” Accessed Nov. 15, 2013. Available at: http://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel?page=1

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Hierarchical structure of attributes [2]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In