0
Research Papers

Comparisons of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Wake Interaction Models

[+] Author and Article Information
Jordan M. Wilson, Cole J. Davis

Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372

Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy

Associate Professor
Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372
e-mail: vskaran@colostate.edu

Paul R. Heyliger

Professor
Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372

1Present address: Quest Integrity Group, Boulder, CO 80301.

2Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received December 18, 2013; final manuscript received September 8, 2014; published online November 17, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Yves Gagnon.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(3), 031001 (Jun 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-13-1373; doi: 10.1115/1.4028914 History: Received December 18, 2013; Revised September 08, 2014; Online November 17, 2014

In this study, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations are performed using the k-ε and k-ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence closure schemes to investigate the interactions of horizontal-axis wind turbine (HAWT) models in the neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). A comparative study of actuator disk, actuator line, and full rotor models of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 5 MW reference turbine is presented. The open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code openfoam 2.1.0 and the commercial software ansysfluent 13.0 are used for simulations. Single turbine models are analyzed for turbulent structures and wake resolution in the downstream region. To investigate the influence of the incident wind field on very large turbine blades, a high-resolution full rotor simulation is carried out for a single turbine to determine blade pressure distributions. Finally, simulations are performed for two inline turbines spaced 5 diameters (5D) apart. The research presented in this study provides an intercomparison of three dominant HAWT models operating at rated conditions in a neutral ABL using an RANS framework. Furthermore, the pressure distributions of the highly resolved full rotor model (FRM) will be useful for future aeroelastic structural analysis of anisotropic composite blade materials.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ball, J., 2011, “Wind Power Hits a Trough,” Wall St. J., Apr. 5, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704629104576190812458488694?mod=_newsreel_3
USDOE, 2008, “20 Percent Wind Energy by 2030,” United States Department of Energy, Technical Report No. DOE/GO-102008-2567.
Meyers, J., and Meneveau, C., 2012, “Optimal Turbine Spacing in Fully Developed Wind Farm Boundary Layers,” Wind Energy, 15(2), pp. 305–317. [CrossRef]
Porté-Agel, F., Wu, Y.-T., Lu, H., and Conzemius, R. J., 2011, “Large-Eddy Simulation of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow Through Wind Turbines and Wind Farms,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 99(4), pp. 154–168. [CrossRef]
Calaf, M., Meneveau, C., and Meyers, J., 2010, “Large Eddy Simulation Study of Fully Developed Wind-Turbine Array Boundary Layers,” Phys. Fluids, 22(1), p. 015110 [CrossRef]
Churchfield, M. J., Moriarty, P. J., Vijayakumar, G., and Brasseur, J. G., 2010, “Wind Energy-Related Atmospheric Boundary Layer Large-Eddy Simulation Using OpenFOAM,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Technical Report No. NREL/CP-500-48905.
Sørensen, J. N., and Shen, W. Z., 2002, “Numerical Modeling of Turbine Wakes,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124(2), pp. 393–399. [CrossRef]
Jones, W., and Launder, B., 1972, “The Prediction of Laminarization With a Two-Equation Model of Turbulence,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(2), pp. 301–314. [CrossRef]
Parente, A., Gorlé, C., Beeck, J. v., and Benocci, C., 2011, “Improved k-ε Model and Wall Function Formulation for the RANS Simulation of ABL Flows,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 99(4), pp. 267–278. [CrossRef]
Vermeer, L. J., Sørensen, J. N., and Crespo, A., 2003, “Wind Turbine Wake Aerodynamics,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 39(67), pp. 467–510. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R., 1994, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D. C., 1988, “Re-Assessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models,” AIAA J., 26(11), pp. 1299–1310. [CrossRef]
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scoot, G., 2009, “Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
Sørensen, J. N., and Myken, A., 1992, “Unsteady Actuator Disc Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 39(1–3), pp. 139–149. [CrossRef]
Madsen, H. A., 1996, “A CFD Analysis for the Actuator Disc Flow Compared With Momentum Theory Results,” Proceedings of the 10th IEA Symposium of Aerodynamics and Wind Turbines, Edinburgh, UK, Dec. 16–17, pp. 109–124.
Balogh, M., Parente, A., and Benocci, C., 2012, “RANS Simulation of ABL Flow Over Complex Terrains Applying an Enhanced k-ε Model and Wall Function Formulation: Implementation and Comparison for Fluent and OpenFOAM,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 104–106, pp. 360–368. [CrossRef]
Parente, A., Gorlé, C., van Beeck, J., and Benocci, C., 2011, “A Comprehensive Modelling Approach for the Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer: Consistent Inflow Conditions, Wall Functions and Turbulence Model,” Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 140(3), pp. 411–428. [CrossRef]
Kasmi, A. E., and Masson, C., 2008, “An Extended k-ε Model for Turbulent Flow Through Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(1), pp. 103–122. [CrossRef]
Rodi, W., 1987, “Examples of Calculation Methods for Flow and Mixing in Stratified Fluids,” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 92(C5), pp. 5305–5328. [CrossRef]
Launder, B. E., and Spalding, D. B., 1974, “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3(2), pp. 269–289. [CrossRef]
Crespo, A., Manuel, F., Moreno, D., Fraga, E., and Hernández, J., 1985, “Numerical Analysis of Wind Turbine Wakes,” Proceedings of the Delphi Workshop on Wind Energy Applications, Greece, May 20–22, pp. 15–25.
Gorlé, C., Beeck, J. v., Rambaud, P., and Tendeloo, G. V., 2009, “CFD Modelling of Small Particle Dispersion: The Influence of the Turbulence Kinetic Energy in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer,” Atmos. Environ., 43(3), pp. 673–681. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D. C., 1993, Turbulence Modelling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc., La Canada Fltrdg, CA.
Hargreaves, D. M., and Wright, N. G., 2007, “On the Use of the kε Model in Commercial CFD Software to Model the Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 95(5), pp. 355–369. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R., 2009, “Review of the Shear-Stress Transport Turbulence Model Experience From an Industrial Perspective,” Int. J. Comp. Fluid Dyn., 23(4), pp. 305–316. [CrossRef]
Tossas, L. A. M., and Leonardi, S., 2013, “Wind Turbine Modeling for Computational Fluid Dynamics,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Technical Report No. NREL/SR-5000-55054.
Sørensen, N. N., and Johansen, J., 2007, “Upwind, Aerodynamics and Aero-Elasticity, Rotor Aerodynamics in Atmospheric Shear Conditions,” EWEA, 2007 European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Milan, Italy, May 7–10.
OpenCFD, 2014, OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox–User Guide.
ANSYS, 2010, ANSYS FLUENT User's Guide, Canonsburg, PA.
Richards, P. J., and Hoxey, R. P., 1993, “Appropriate Boundary Conditions for Computations Wind Engineering Models Using the k-ε Turbulence Model,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 46–47, pp. 145–153. [CrossRef]
Yang, Y., Gu, M., Chen, S., and Jin, X., 2009, “New Inflow Boundary Conditions for Modelling the Neutral Equilibrium Atmospheric Boundary Layer in Computational Wind Engineering,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 97(2), pp. 88–95. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R., and Rumsey, C. L., 2007, “Effective Inflow Conditions for Turbulence Models in Aerodynamic Calculations,” AIAA J., 45(10), pp. 2544–2553. [CrossRef]
Ferziger, J. H., and Milovan, P., 1996, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin.
Sørensen, J. N., and Kock, C. W., 1995, “A Model for Unsteady Rotor Aerodynamics,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 58(3), pp. 259–275. [CrossRef]
Churchfield, M. J., Lee, S., Moriarty, P. J., Martinez, L. A., Leonardi, S., Vijayakumar, G., and Brasseur, J. G., 2012, “Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Plant Aerodynamics,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Technical Report No. NREL/CP-500-53554.
Martinez, L. A., Leonardi, S., Churchfield, M. J., and Moriarty, P. J., 2012, “A Comparison of Actuator Disc and Actuator Line Wind Turbine Models and Best Practices for Their Use,” AIAA Paper No. 2012-0900. [CrossRef]
Stovall, T., Pawlas, G., and Moriarty, P. J., 2010, “Wind Farm Wake Simulations in OpenFOAM,” AIAA Paper No. 2010-825. [CrossRef]
Bazilevs, Y., Hsu, M.-C., Akkerman, I., Wright, S., Takizawa, K., Henicke, B., Spielman, T., and Tezduyar, T. E., 2011, “3D Simulation of Wind Turbine Rotors at Full Scale. Part I: Geometry Modeling and Aerodynamics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 65(1–3), pp. 207–235. [CrossRef]
Bazilevs, Y., Hsu, M.-C., Kiendl, J., Wüchner, R., and Bletzinger, K.-U., 2011, “3D Simulation of Wind Turbine Rotors at Full Scale. Part II: Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling With Composite Blades,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 65(1–3), pp. 236–253. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of two inline turbines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Vertical profiles of mean streamwise velocity (left) and turbulent kinetic energy (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Grid independence study for (a) ADM, (b) ALM, and (c) FRM rotor models. Mean streamwise velocity (u¯) is measured 0.5D downstream. The number of cells is calculated over a circular region centered at the rotor hub with a diameter of 150 m (coinciding with the sliding mesh surface of the FRM).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Computational grid for FRM simulations of two turbines with 5D spacing (left) and grid of a sliding mesh domain for a turbine rotor enclosed (right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contours of streamwise velocity (m/s) for single turbine models. ADM (top), ALM (center), FRM (bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of downstream vertical profiles of streamwise velocity (m/s) for (a) ADM, (b) ALM, and (c) FRM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contours of turbulence intensity for single turbine models. ADM (top), ALM (center), FRM (bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Grid independence study of maximum turbine blade pressure compared to the theoretical maximum Bernoulli pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contours of pressure (Pa) along blade surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Contours of streamwise velocity (m/s) for inline turbines spaced 5D apart. ADM (top), ALM (center), FRM (bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of downstream vertical profiles of streamwise velocity (m/s) for (a) 0.5D downstream and (b) 4D downstream for first and second turbines (T1 and T2, respectively)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Contours of turbulence intensity for inline turbines spaced 5D apart. ADM (top), ALM (center), FRM (bottom).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In