Research Papers

Improvement of Radiative Performances of High Temperature Solar Particle Receivers Using Coated Particles and Mixtures

[+] Author and Article Information
Freddy Ordóñez

Processes, Materials and Solar,
Energy Laboratory,
7 rue du Four Solaire,
Font-Romeu-Odeillo 66120, France
e-mail: f.ordonez.m@gmail.com

Cyril Caliot

Processes, Materials and Solar,
Energy Laboratory,
7 rue du Four Solaire,
Font-Romeu-Odeillo 66120, France
e-mail: cyril.caliot@promes.cnrs.fr

Françoise Bataille

Department of Mathematics,
Florida State University,
1017 Academic Way,
Tallahassee, FL 32306

Guy Lauriat

Laboratoire de Modélisation et Simulation
Multi Echelle,
Université Paris-Est,
5, Bvd Descartes,
Marne-la-Vallée 77454, France

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received February 5, 2014; final manuscript received September 1, 2014; published online October 8, 2014. Editor: Gilles Flamant.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(2), 021009 (Oct 08, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-14-1048; doi: 10.1115/1.4028562 History: Received February 05, 2014; Revised September 01, 2014

The use of HfB2, ZrB2, HfC, ZrC, W, and SiC particles in a high temperature solar particle receiver (SPR) is analyzed. The SPR is modeled as a 1D slab of spherical particles dispersion, submitted to a concentrated and collimated solar flux (q0 = 1500 kW/m2). The temperature inside the SPR is taken constant (T = 1300 K), as for a well-stirred receiver. For the W and SiC, the refractive indexes reported in the literature are retained while the real and imaginary parts of the refractive indexes of the others materials are obtained from available reflectance data, using the Kramers–Kronig (KK) relationships. Three SPR configurations are considered: a homogeneous medium with only one kind of particles, a medium with a mixture of two materials and a medium with coated particles. The three configuration results are compared with those obtained using particles made with an ideal material. For the first configuration, the lowest radiative losses are found using small particles of sizes close to d = 2 μm. For the second configuration, non-noticeable improvements are found by the use of mixtures of the studied materials. For the third configuration, when the SiC is used as mantle, the radiative losses decrease to approach the ideal minimum. The best combination corresponds to a particle with a core of W coated by SiC. Improvements of 2.6% and 2.8% may be achieved using coating thickness of 50 nm with particles of d = 2 μm and d = 100 μm, respectively. The use of coated particles may thus lead to significant improvements in the radiative performances of a SPR working at high temperature.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hunt, A., 1978, “Small Particle Heat Exchanger,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Technical Report No. LBL-7841.
Abdelrahman, M., Fumeaux, P., and Suter, P., 1979, “Study of Solid–Gas Suspensions Used for Direct Absorption of Concentrated Solar Radiation,” Sol. Energy, 22(1), pp. 45–48. [CrossRef]
Tan, T., and Chen, Y., 2010, “Review of Study on Solid Particle Solar Receivers,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14(1), pp. 265–276. [CrossRef]
Hunt, A., and Miller, F., 2010, “Small Particle Heat Exchanger Receivers for Solar Thermal Power,” SolarPaces: Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Perpignan, France, Sept. 21–24.
Falcone, P., Noring, J., and Hruby, J., 1985, “Assessment of a Solid Particle Receiver for a High Temperature Solar Central Receiver System,” Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report No. SAND85-8208.
Hruby, J., 1986, “A Technical Feasibility Study of a Solid Particle Solar Central Receiver for High Temperature Applications,” Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report No. SAND86-8211.
Stahl, K., Griffin, J., Matson, B., and Pettit, R., 1986, “Optical Characterization of Solid Particle Solar Central Receiver Materials,” Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report No. SAND85-1215.
Kitzmiller, K., and Miller, F., 2010, “Thermodynamic Cycles for Small Particle Heat Exchange Receiver Used in Concentrating Solar Power Plants,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., 133(3), p. 031014. [CrossRef]
Bertocchi, R., Karni, J., and Kribus, A., 2004, “Experimental Evaluation of a Non-Isothermal High Temperature Solar Particle Receiver,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 687–700. [CrossRef]
Ordóñez, F., Caliot, C., Bataille, F., and Lauriat, G., 2014, “Optimisation of the Optical Particle Properties for a High Temperature Solar Particle Receiver,” Sol. Energy, 99, pp. 299–311. [CrossRef]
Ávila-Marín, A., 2011, “Volumetric Receivers in Solar Thermal Power Plants With Central Receiver System Technology: A Review,” Sol. Energy, 85(5), pp. 891–910. [CrossRef]
Sani, E., Mercatelli, L., Fontani, D., Sans, J., and Sciti, D., 2011, “Hafnium and Tantalum Carbides for High Temperature Solar Receivers,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 3(6), p. 063107. [CrossRef]
Sani, E., Mercatelli, L., Jafrancesco, D., Sans, J., and Sciti, D., 2012, “Ultra-High Temperature Ceramics for Solar Receivers: Spectral and High Temperature Emittance Characterization,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publications, 7, p. 012052. [CrossRef]
Maag, G., Lipinski, W., and Steinfeld, A., 2009, “Particle Gas Reacting Flow Under Concentrated Solar Irradiation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52(21–22), pp. 4997–5004. [CrossRef]
Steinfeld, A., and Palumbo, R., 2001, “Solar Thermochemical Process Technology,” Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Vol. 15, R. A.Meyers, ed., Academic Press, pp. 237–256.
Joseph, J., Wiscombe, W., and Weinman, J., 1976, “The Delta-Eddington Approximation for Radiative Flux Transfer,” J. Atmos. Sci., 33(12), pp. 2452–2459. [CrossRef]
Tien, C., and Drolen, B., 1987, “Thermal Radiation in Particulate Media With Dependent and Independent Scattering,” Annu. Rev. Numer. Fluid Mech. Heat Transfer, 1, pp. 1–32. [CrossRef]
Modest, M., 2003, Radiative Heat Transfer, 2nd ed. Academic, New York.
Chandrasekhar, S., 1960, Radiative Transfer, Dover, New York.
Meador, W., and Weaver, W., 1979, “Two-Stream Approximation to Radiative Transfer in Planetary Atmospheres: An Unified Description of Existing Methods and New Improvement,” J. Atmos. Sci., 37(3), pp. 630–643. [CrossRef]
Bohren, C., and Huffman, D., 1983, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, New York.
Toon, O., and Ackerman, T., 1981, “Algorithms for the Calculation of Scattering by Stratified Spheres,” Appl. Opt., 20(20), pp. 3657–3660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dombrovsky, L., and Baillis, D., 2010, Thermal Radiation in Disperse Systems: An Engineering Approach, Begellhouse Inc., West Redding, CT.
Pégourié, B., 1988, “Optical Properties of Alpha Silicon Carbide,” Astron. Astrophys., 194(1–2), pp. 335–339.
Palik, E., 1985, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Elsevier Science & Technology, New York.
Wooten, F., 1972, Optical Properties of Solids, Academic, New York.
Ohta, K., and Ishida, H., 1988, “Comparison Among Several Numerical Integration Methods for Kramers–Kronig Transformation,” Appl. Spectrosc., 42(6), pp. 952–957. [CrossRef]
Bigelow, M., Lepeshkin, N., Shin, H., and Boyd, R., 2006, “Propagation of Smooth and Discontinuous Pulses Through Materials With Very Large or Very Small Group Velocities,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 18(11), pp. 3117–3126. [CrossRef]
Klein, H., Karni, J., Ben-Zvi, R., and Bertocchi, R., 2007, “Heat Transfer in a Directly Solar Receiver/Reactor for Solid–Gas Reactions,” Sol. Energy, 81(10), pp. 1227–1239. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a 1D, isothermal, homogeneous SPR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of the spectral radiative losses for the SPR model using the optimized ideal material reported by Ordóñez et al. [10]. MC means Monte Carlo method and TS means two-stream method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Normal reflectance for four UHTCs suggested as selective materials to be used in high temperature SPRs. The solar spectrum is shown in the insets (black continuous line). (Reproduced by permission from Sani et al. Copyright 2012 by Sani et al.) [13].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Real and imaginary parts of the refractive index (a) and (b) for the hafnium diboride, hafnium carbide, and silicon carbide, (c) and (d) for the zirconium diboride, zirconium carbide, and tungsten

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Real and imaginary part of the refractive indexes for an ideal material that minimize the radiative losses. In circles obtained with the Lorenz–Mie theory and the PSO algorithm. In continuous line computed from the reflectivity using the KK dispersion relations. In both cases the solar flux is taken as the blackbody emission at 5777 K normalized to q0 = 1500 kW/m2. The temperature profile is constant at T = 1300 K.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normal reflectivity computed from the two computed refractive indexes shown in Fig. 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Radiative losses of a SPR using different mixtures of materials of two sizes: (a) d = 2 μm, (b) d = 100 μm. In both subfigures a mixing ratio of 1 means a 100% SiC medium.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Radiative losses of a SPR using coated particles. W and UHTCs are used for the core and SiC for the mantle. In both subfigures, a core/mantle ratio of 1 means that no coating exist.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparisons of the absorption Mie-efficiency (Qabs) (a), scattering Mie-efficiency (Qsca) (b) and asymmetry factor (g) for W, SiC, and W coated with SiC particles in regard of the optimized ideal material for a particle diameter d = 100 μm




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In