Research Papers

Structural Dynamics Testing and Analysis for Design Evaluation and Monitoring of Heliostats

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Todd Griffith

Engineering Sciences Center,
Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800,
Albuquerque, NM 87185-1124
e-mail: dgriffi@sandia.gov

Adam C. Moya, Clifford K. Ho

Concentrating Solar Technologies Department,
P.O. Box 5800,
Albuquerque, NM 87185-1127

Patrick S. Hunter

Engineering Sciences Center,
Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800,
Albuquerque, NM 87185-0557

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received June 19, 2012; final manuscript received September 2, 2014; published online October 23, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Markus Eck.

The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(2), 021010 (Oct 23, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: SOL-12-1160; doi: 10.1115/1.4028561 History: Received June 19, 2012; Revised September 02, 2014

Heliostat vibrations due to wind loading can degrade optical pointing accuracy while fatiguing the structural components. This paper reports the use of structural dynamic measurements for design evaluation and monitoring of heliostat vibrations. A heliostat located at the national solar thermal testing facility (NSTTF) at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, has been instrumented to measure its modes of vibration, strain and displacements under wind loading. The information gained from these tests will be used to evaluate and improve structural models that predict the motions/deformations of the heliostat due to gravitational and dynamic wind loadings. These deformations can cause optical errors and motions that degrade the performance of the heliostat. The main contributions of this work include: (1) demonstration of the role of structural dynamic tests (also known as modal tests) to provide a characterization of the important dynamics of the heliostat structure as they relate to durability and optical accuracy, (2) the use of structural dynamic tests to provide data to evaluate and improve the accuracy of computer-based design models, and (3) the selection of sensors and data-processing techniques that are appropriate for long-term monitoring of heliostat motions. This work also demonstrates the first measurements of rigid body modes of vibration associated with heliostat drive (azimuth and elevation) mechanisms, which are important structural dynamic response characteristics in dynamic design of heliostats.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Griffith, D. T., Moya, A. C., Ho, C. K., and Hunter, P. S., 2011, “Structural Dynamics Testing and Analysis for Design Evaluation and Monitoring of Heliostats,” ASME, Paper No. ES2011–54222. [CrossRef]
Christian, J. M., and Ho, C. K., 2010, “Finite Element Modeling of Concentrating Solar Collectors for Evaluation of Gravity Loads, Bending, and Optical Characterization,” ASME, Paper No. ES2010-90050. [CrossRef]
Moya, A. C., and Ho, C. K., 2011, “Modeling and Validation of Heliostat Deformation Due to Static Loading,” ASME, Paper No. ES2011-54216. [CrossRef]
Gong, B., Li, Z., Wang, Z., and Wanga, Y., 2012, “Wind-Induced Dynamic Response of Heliostat,” Renewable Energy, 38(1), pp. 206–213. [CrossRef]
Peterka, J. A., and Derickson, R. G., 1992, “Wind Load Design Methods for Ground-Based Heliostats and Parabolic Dish Collectors,” Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report No. SAND-92-7009.
Craig, R. R., and Kurdila, A. J., 2006, Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics, 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Ewins, D. J., 2000, Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application, 2nd ed., Research Studies Press, Ltd., Baldock, Hertfordshire, England.
Mayes, R. L., and Klenke, S. E., 1999, “The SMAC Modal Parameter Extraction Package,” Proceedings of the 17th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, Feb. 8–11, pp. 812–818.
Menicucci, A. R., Ho, C. K., and Griffith, D. T., 2012, “High Performance Computing for Static and Dynamic Analyses of Heliostats for Concentrating Solar Power,” Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Forum (WREF 2012), Denver, CO, May 13–17, pp. 645–651.
Moya, A., Ho, C., Sment, J., Griffith, D. T., Christian, J., and Allen, M. S., 2013, “Modal Analysis and Dynamic Monitoring of a Concentrating Solar Heliostat,” Proceedings of the 31st International Modal Analysis Conference, Garden Grove, CA, Feb. 11–14, pp. 543–551.
Ho, C., Griffith, D. T., Sment, J., Moya, A. C., Christian, J. M., Yuan, J. K., and Hunter, P. S., 2012, “Dynamic Testing and Analysis of Heliostats to Evaluate Impacts of Wind on Optical Performance and Structural Fatigue,” Proceedings of Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems (SolarPACES) 2012 Conference, Marrakech, Morocco, Sept. 11–14, p. 22695.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Aerial view of Sandia 5-MWt central receiver test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A heliostat located at the Sandia CRTF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Description of heliostat major structural elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Eight lowest frequency pretest analysis mode shapes for vertical configuration: (a) yoke bending in-plane, (b) yoke bending out-of-plane, (c) first torque tube bending, (d) second torque tube bending, (e) yoke bending (out-of-plane, out-of-phase), (f) in-plane bending (1), (g) in-plane bending (2), and (h) in-plane bending (3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Wind speed measurement near site

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Hammer excitation during testing: (a) truss excitation and (b) yoke excitation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Instrumented impact hammers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Accelerometer mountings with cable: (a) truss mounted accelerometer and (b) yoke mounted accelerometer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Instrumentation layout for preliminary modal test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Test configurations: 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 deg (from left to right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of numerical and experimental mode shapes for first torque tube bending mode 4 in Table 3)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In