Research Papers

A Thermodynamic and Cost Analysis of Solar Syngas From the Zn/ZnO Cycle

[+] Author and Article Information
Julia Haltiwanger Nicodemus

Engineering Studies,
Lafayette College,
Easton, PA 18042
e-mail: nicodemj@lafayette.edu

Morgan McGuinness

Math and Physics,
Lafayette College,
Easton, PA 18042

Rijan Maharjan

Mechanical Engineering,
Lafayette College,
Easton, PA 18042

From NREL solar resource data.

Based on CCPC+TR=C/9.43×10-5, derived from Ref. [2].

Peters et al. [16], Figs. 13 and 14, p. 627.

Based on EIA data and the lower heating value of natural gas.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: Including Wind Energy and Building Energy Conservation. Manuscript received July 25, 2014; final manuscript received August 1, 2014; published online August 25, 2014. Editor: Gilles Flamant.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(1), 011012 (Aug 25, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: SOL-14-1214; doi: 10.1115/1.4028189 History: Received July 25, 2014; Revised August 01, 2014

We present a thermodynamic and cost analysis of synthesis gas (syngas) production by the Zn/ZnO solar thermochemical fuel production cycle. A mass, energy, and entropy balance over each step of the Zn/ZnO syngas production cycle is presented. The production of CO and H2 is considered simultaneously across the range of possible stoichiometric combinations, and the effects of irreversibilities due to both recombination in the quenching process following dissociation of ZnO and incomplete conversion in the fuel production step are explored. In the cost analysis, continuous functions for each cost component are presented, allowing estimated costs of syngas fuel produced at plants between 50 and 500 MWth. For a solar concentration ratio of 10,000, a dissociation temperature of 2300 K, and a CO fraction in the syngas of 1/3, the maximum cycle efficiency is 39% for an ideal case in which there is no recombination in the quencher, complete conversion in the oxidizer, and maximum heat recovery. In a 100 MWth plant, the cost to produce syngas would be $0.025/MJ for this ideal case. The effect of heat recuperation, recombination in the quencher, and incomplete conversion on efficiency and cost are explored. The effects of plant size and feedstock costs on the cost of solar syngas are also explored. The results underscore the importance improving quencher and oxidizer processes to reduce costs. However, even assuming the ideal case, the predicted cost of solar syngas is 5.5 times more expensive than natural gas on an energy basis. The process will therefore require incentive policies that support early implementation in order to become economically competitive.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wilhelm, D., Simbeck, D., Karp, A., and Dickenson, R., 2001, “Syngas Production for Gas-to-Liquid Applications: Technologies, Issues and Outlook,” Fuel Process. Technol., 71(1–3), pp. 139–148. [CrossRef]
Steinfeld, A., 2002, “Solar Hydrogen Production via a Two-Step Water-Splitting Thermochemical Cycle Based on Zn-Zno Redox Reactions,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27(6), pp. 611–619. [CrossRef]
Venstrom, L., and Davidson, J. H., 2011, “Splitting Water and Carbon Dioxide via the Heterogeneous Oxidation of Zinc Vapor: Thermodynamic Considerations,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 133(1), p. 011017. [CrossRef]
Loutzenhiser, P. G., and Steinfeld, A., 2011, “Solar Syngas Production From Co2 and H2O in a Two-Step Thermochemical Cycle via zn/zno Redox Reactions: Thermochemical Cycle Analysis,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(19), pp. 12141–12147. [CrossRef]
Charvin, P., Abanades, S., Lemont, F., and Flamant, G., 2008, “Analysis of Solar Chemical Processes for Hydrogen Production From Water Splitting Thermochemical Cycles,” Energy Convers. Manage., 49(6), pp. 1547–1556. [CrossRef]
Kromer, M., Roth, K., Takata, R., and Chin, P., 2011, “Support for Cost Analyses on Solar-Driven High Temperature Thermochemical Water-Splitting Cycles,” TIAX, LLC, Report No. #D0535.
Bale, C. W., “Fact Thermochemical Database,” http://www.crct.polymtl.ca/fact/
Loutzenhiser, P. G., Barthel, F., Stamatiou, A., and Steinfeld, A., 2011, “Co2 Reduction With Zn Particles in a Packed-Bed Reactor,” AIChE J., 57(9), pp. 2529–2534. [CrossRef]
Sargent, and Lundy, 2003, “Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts,” National Renewable Energy Lab, Report No. NREL/SR-550-34440.
Kolb, G. J., Jones, S. A., Donnelley, M. W., Gorman, D., Thomas, R., Davenport, R., and Lumia, R., 2007, “Heliostat Cost Reduction Study,” Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report No. SAND2007-3293.
Kraupl, S., and Wieckert, C., 2007, “Economic Evaluation of the Solar Carbothermic Reduction of Zno by Using a Single Sensitivity Analysis and a Monte-Carlo Risk Analysis,” Energy, 32, pp. 1134–1147. [CrossRef]
2013. Coyote Lakes Road, Yermo, CA 92398: 640 Acres, for Commercial Use, With Water and Electricity. Real Estate Listing, July, www.zillow.com
Kistler, B., 1986, “A User's Manual for DELSOL3: A Computer Code for Calculating the Optical Performance and Optimal System Design for Solar Thermal Central Receiver Plants,” Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia Report No. SAND86-8018.
Weimer, A., Perkins, C., Lichty, P., Funke, H., Zartman, J., and Hirsch, D., 2009, “Development of a Solar-Thermal Zno/Zn Water-Splitting Thermochemical Cycle,” University of Colorado and NREL, Final Report to NREL (DE-PS36-03GO93007-Subcontract-05-SHGR-006).
Turchi, C., and Heath, G., 2013, “Molten Salt Power Tower Cost Model for the System Advisor Model (SAM),” NREL, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-5500-57625.
Peters, M., Timmerhaus, K., and Ronald, W., 2003, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
Tribe, M. A., and Alpine, R. L. W., 1986, “Scale Economies and the “0.6 rule”,” Eng. Costs Prod. Econ.10(4), pp. 271–278. [CrossRef]
Vogel, W., and Kalb, H., 2010, Large-Scale Solar Thermal Power, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
Gstoehl, D., Brambilla, A., Schunk, L. O., and Steinfeld, A., 2008, “A Quenching Apparatus for the Gaseous Products of the Solar Thermal Dissociation of zno,” J. Mater. Sci., 43(14), pp. 4729–4736. [CrossRef]
Murphy, R., and Jaccard, M., 2011, “Modeling Efficiency Standards and a Carbon Tax: Simulations for the US Using a Hybrid Approach,” Energy J., 32(1), pp. 37–54.
Nicodemus, J. H., and McGuinness, M., 2014, “Carbon-Neutral Solar Syngas: Cost and Policy Considerations,” Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society Solar 2014 Conference, San Francisco, CA, July 6–10.
Brown, F. L., 2008, “The Evolution of Markets for Water Rights and Bulk Water,” New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute.
Walton, B., 2010, “The Price of Water: A Comparison of Water Rates, Usage in 30 U.S. Cities,” http:// www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/the-price-of-water-a-comparison-of-water-rates-usage-in-30-u-s-cities/
Rubin, E. S., 2001, Introduction to Engineering and the Environment, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Haltiwanger, J. F., Davidson, J. H., and Wilson, E. J., 2010, “Renewable Hydrogen From the Zn/Zno Solar Thermochemical Cycle: A Cost and Policy Analysis,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 132(4), p. 041011. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Model flow diagram of the solar thermochemical cycle for syngas production via ZnO dissociation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Oxidation temperature dependence of cycle efficiency for multiple CO:H2 ratios for the “ideal” case and the “realistic” case, both with and without heat recuperation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cost of syngas as a function of the plant size for the ideal case (α = 1, β = 1) and the realistic case (α = 0.8, β = 0.61), both with heat recuperation (dashed lines) and without heat recuperation (solid lines)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fuel cost versus solar resource (beam radiation) 50 MW, 100 MW, 250 MW, and 500 MW plants

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cost of syngas over a range of possible feedstock CO2 costs for a 100 MWth (solid lines) and a 500 MWth (dashed lines) plant for a feedstock water cost of $0.01/l (thin lines) and $0.1/l (thick lines)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Sensitivity of the cost of syngas to a ±1% change in component and financing assumptions




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In