0
Research Papers

Transient Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Solar Based Integrated System

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Rabbani

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: musharaf.rabbani@uoit.ca

T. A. H. Ratlamwala

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: tahir.ratlamwala@uoit.ca

I. Dincer

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: ibrahim.dincer@uoit.ca

1Present address: SZABIST, 90 and 100 Clifton Campus, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 2, 2013; final manuscript received June 8, 2014; published online August 25, 2014. Editor: Gilles Flamant.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(1), 011010 (Aug 25, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-13-1354; doi: 10.1115/1.4028072 History: Received December 02, 2013; Revised June 08, 2014

The present study focuses on transient energy and exergy analyses of an integrated heliostat field, gas-turbine cycle and organic Rankine cycle system capable of generating power and heat in a carbon-free manner. A parametric study is carried out to ascertain the effect of varying the exit temperature of salt and the pressure ratio (PR) on the net work output, rate of heat lost from the receiver, and energy and exergy efficiencies for 365 days of the year and from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. The results are obtained for the city of Toronto, Canada and indicate that the net work output increases from 1481 to 3339 kW with a rise in the exit salt temperature from 1200 to 1600 K. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated system vary from 0.72 to 0.78 and 0.36 to 0.46, respectively, with a rise in the exit salt temperature. The energy and exergy efficiencies vary from 0.68 to 0.73 and 0.35 to 0.39, respectively, with an increase in the PR from 10 to 20.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kribus, A., Zaibel, R., Carey, D., Segal, A., and Karni, J., 1998, “A Solar-Driven Combined Cycle Power Plant,” Sol. Energy, 62(2), pp. 121–129. [CrossRef]
Wu, S. Y., Xiao, L., Cao, Y., and Li, Y. R., 2010, “A Parabolic Dish/AMTEC Solarthermal Power System and Its Performance Evaluation,” Appl. Energy, 87(2), pp. 452–462. [CrossRef]
Ratlamwala, T. A. H., Dincer, I., and Gadalla, M. A., 2012, “Energy and Exergy Analyses of an Integrated Solar-Based Desalination Quadruple Effect Absorption System for Freshwater and Cooling Production,” Int. J. Energy Res., 37(18), pp. 1569–1579. [CrossRef]
Alkhamis, A. I., and Sherif, S. A., 1997, “Feasibility Study of a Solar-Assisted Heating/Cooling System for an Aquatic Centre in Hot and Humid Climates,” Int. J. Energy Res., 21(9), pp. 823–839. [CrossRef]
Ratlamwala, T. A. H., Dincer, I., and Aydin, M., 2012, “Energy and Exergy Analyses and Optimization Study of an Integrated Solar Heliostat Field System for Hydrogen Production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(24), pp. 18704–18712. [CrossRef]
Xu, C., Wang, Z., Li, X., and Sun, F., 2011, “Energy and Exergy Analysis of Solar Power Tower Plants,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 31(17–18), pp. 3904–3913. [CrossRef]
Garcia, I. L., Alvarez, J. L., and Blanco, D., 2011, “Performance Model for Parabolic Trough Solar Thermal Power Plants With Thermal Storage: Comparison to Operating Plant Data,” Sol. Energy, 85(10), pp. 2443–2460. [CrossRef]
Kalogirou, S. A., 2004, “Solar Thermal Collectors and Applications,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 30(3), pp. 231–295. [CrossRef]
Huang, W., Hu, P., and Chen, Z., 2012, “Performance Simulation of a Parabolic Trough Solar Collector,” Sol. Energy, 86(2), pp. 746–755. [CrossRef]
Schicktanz, M. D., Schmidt, C., and Fedrizzi, R., 2014, “Classification of Rating Methods for Solar Heating and Cooling Systems,” Energy Procedia, 48, pp. 1676–1687. [CrossRef]
Xu, Q., Li, L., Li, H., Huang, W., and Li, Y., 2014, “Performance Comparison of Solar Parabolic Trough System With Glass and Film Reflector,” Energy Conver. Manage., 85, pp. 581–590. [CrossRef]
Barigozzi, G., Bonetti, G., Perdichizzi, F. A., and Ravelli, S., 2012, “Thermal Performance Prediction of a Solar Hybrid Gas Turbine,” Sol. Energy, 86(7), pp. 2116–2127. [CrossRef]
Le-Roux, W. G., Bello-Ochende, T., and Meyer, J. P., 2012, “Thermodynamic Optimisation of the Integrated Design of a Small-Scale Solar Thermal Brayton Cycle,” Int. J. Energy Res., 36(11), pp. 1088–1104. [CrossRef]
Gupta, M. K., and Kaushik, S. C., 2010, “Exergy Analysis and Investigation for Various Feed Water Heaters of Direct Steam Generation Solar–Thermal Power Plant,” Renewable Energy, 35(6), pp. 1228–1235. [CrossRef]
Saidur, R., BoroumandJazi, G., Mekhlif, S., and Jameel, M., 2012, “Exergy Analysis of Solar Energy Applications,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 16(1), pp. 350–356. [CrossRef]
Ratlamwala, T. A. H., Gadalla, M. A., and Dincer, I., 2011, “Performance Assessment of an Integrated PV/T and Triple Effect Cooling System for Hydrogen and Cooling Production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(17), pp. 11282–11291. [CrossRef]
Suresh, M. V. J. J., Reddy, K. S., and Kolar, A. K., 2010, “4-E (Energy, Exergy, Environment, and Economic) Analysis of Solar Thermal Aided Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Energy Sustainable Dev., 14(4), pp. 267–279. [CrossRef]
Zhai, H., Dai, Y. J., Wu, J. Y., and Wang, R. Z., 2009, “Energy and Exergy Analyses on a Novel Hybrid Solar Heating, Cooling and Power Generation System for Remote Areas,” Appl. Energy, 86(9), pp. 1395–1404. [CrossRef]
Iqbal, M., 1983, An Introduction to Solar Radiation, Academic Press, Toronto, Canada.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of an integrated system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Effect of increase in the exit temperature of molten salt from the receiver and day of the year on the rate of heat lost from the receiver (a) at 10:00 am, (b) at 12:00 pm, and (c) at 2:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Effect of increase in the exit temperature of molten salt from the receiver and day of the year on the net power generated by the integrated system (a) at 10:00 am, (b) at 12:00 pm, and (c) at 2:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of increase in the exit temperature of molten salt from the receiver and day of the year on (a) the energy efficiency and (b) the exergy efficiency of the integrated system at 12:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of increase in the exit temperature of molten salt from the receiver on the energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated system on 180th day of the year and at 12:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of increase in the PR and day of the year on the mass flow rate of the Rankine cycle (a) at 10:00 am, (b) at 12:00 pm, and (c) at 2:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of increase in the PR and day of the year on the net work output from the integrated system (a) at 10:00 am, (b) at 12:00 pm, and (c) at 2:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of increase in the PR and day of the year on (a) the energy efficiency and (b) the exergy efficiency of the integrated system at 12:00 pm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of increase in the PR on the energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated system on 180th day of the year at 12:00 pm

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In