Research Papers

Intelligent Fault Tolerant Energy Management System With Layered Architecture for a Photovoltaic Power Plant

[+] Author and Article Information
Mansour Selseleh Jonban

Department of Mechatronics,
College of Engineering,
Ahar Branch,
Islamic Azad University,
Ahar, Iran
e-mail: m-selselehjonban@iau-ahar.ac.ir

Adel Akbarimajd

Electrical Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili,
Ardabil, Iran
e-mail: akbarimajd@uma.ac.ir

Javad Javidan

Electrical Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili,
Ardabil, Iran
e-mail: javidan@uma.ac.ir

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: Including Wind Energy and Building Energy Conservation. Manuscript received December 22, 2013; final manuscript received June 10, 2014; published online July 29, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Santiago Silvestre.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(1), 011004 (Jul 29, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: SOL-13-1374; doi: 10.1115/1.4027931 History: Received December 22, 2013; Revised June 10, 2014

Increasing of renewable power plants has raised the need for intelligent energy management systems (EMSs). The aim of management system is to reduce energy absorbed from fossil sources. In this paper a layered behavioral based architecture named subsumption is employed for energy management in PV based power plant with storage devices and active load. In the proposed architecture components of the plant including SC, PV, battery, and the grid are organized in different layers. Each layer is implemented as a behavioral rule that can independently perceive and act in the environment. There is a hierarchy in the layers where lower layers have more priority and can inhibit higher layers. The layers use a simple protocol to communicate with management unit. Using this approach, a simple, fast, extensible, and fault tolerant EMS is achieved.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Cohen, D. A., 2008, “Gridagents: Intelligent Agent Applications for Integration of Distributed Energy Sources Within Distribution Systems,” Power and Energy Society General Meeting—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Cent ury, 2008 IEEE, Pittsburgh, PA, July 20–24, pp. 1–5.
Sycara, K., 1998, “Multiagent Systems,” AI Mag., 19(2), pp. 79–92.
Dias, M. B., and Stentz, A., 2002, “Opportunistic Optimization for Market-Based Multirobot Control,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'02), Lausanne, Switzerland, 3, pp. 2714–2720.
Zlot, R., and Stentz, A., 2005, “Market-Based Multirobot Coordination for Complex Tasks,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 25(1), pp.73–101. [CrossRef]
Song, T., Yan, X., Liang, A., Chen, K., and Guan, H., 2009, “A Distributed Bidirectional Auction Algorithm for Multirobot Coordination,” Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Research Challenges in Computer Science, Shanghai, China, Dec. 28–29, pp. 145–148.
Nanjanath, M., and Gini, M., 2006, “Auctions for Task Allocation to Robots,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 550–557.
Matarić, M. J., Sukhatme, G. S., and Ostergaard, E. H., 2003, “Multi-Robot Task Allocation in Uncertain Environments,” Autonom. Rob., 14(2–3), pp. 255–263. [CrossRef]
Jiang, Z., 2006, “Agent-Based Control Framework for Distributed Energy Resources Microgrids,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, Hongkong, China, Dec. 18–22, pp. 646–652.
Russell, S. J., and Norvig, P., 2003, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Dixon, J., Moran, L., Rodriguez, J., and Domke, R., 2005, “Reactive Power Compensation Technologies: State of the Art Review,” Proc. IEEE, 93(12), pp. 2144–2164. [CrossRef]
Hao, S., 2003, “A Reactive Power Management Proposal for Transmission Operators,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 18(4), pp. 1374–1381. [CrossRef]
Tolbert, L. M., Hairong, Q., and Peng, F. Z., 2001, “Scalable Multi-Agent System for Realtime Electric Power Management,” Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vancouver, BC, July 15–19, Vol. 3, pp. 1676–1679. [CrossRef]
Dong, F., Chowdhury, B. H., Crow, M. L., and Acar, L., 2005, “Improving Voltage Stability by Reactive Power Reserve Management,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 20(1), pp. 338–345. [CrossRef]
Lum, R., Kotak, D. B., and Gruver, W. A., 2005, “Multi-Agent Coordination of Distributed Energy Systems,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Waikoloa, HI, Oct. 10–12, Vol. 3, pp. 2584–2589.
Dimeas, A. L., and Hatziargyriou, N. D., 2005, “A MAS Architecture for Microgrids Control,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems, Arlington, VA, Nov. 6–10, pp. 402–406.
Gomez-Gualdron, J. G., and Velez-Reyes, M., 2006, “Simulating a Multi-Agent Based Self-Reconfigurable Electric Power Distribution System,” Proceedings of the IEEE Workshops on Computers in Power Electronics, Troy, NY, July 16–19, pp. 1–7.
Pant, P., Schoder, K., and Feliachi, A., 2007, “An Integrated Electric Shipboard Power System Testbed,” Proceedings IEEE on Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, Arlington, VA, May 21–23, pp. 438–442.
Baxevanos, I. S., and Labridis, D. P., 2007, “Implementing Multiagent Systems Technology for Power Distribution Network Control and Protection Management,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 22(1), pp. 433–442. [CrossRef]
Huang, K., Cartes, D. A., and Srivastava, S. K., 2007, “A Multiagent-Based Algorithm for Ring-Structured Shipboard Power System Reconfiguration,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C, 37(5), pp. 1016–1021. [CrossRef]
Zhou, G., Krarti, M., and Henze, G. P., 2005, “Parametric Analysis of Active and Passive Building Thermal Storage Utilization,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 127(1), pp. 37–46. [CrossRef]
Abras, S., Pesty, S., Ploix, S., and Jacomino, M., 2010, Advantages of MAS for the Resolution of a Power Management Problem in Smart Home, Vol. 70, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 269–278.
El-Shater, T. F., Eskander, M. N., and El-Hagry, M. T., 2006, “Energy Flow and Management of a Hybrid Wind/PV/Fuel Cell Generation System,” Energy Convers. Manage., 47(9–10), pp. 1264–1280. [CrossRef]
Cirrincione, M., Cossentino, M., Gaglio, S., Hilaire, V., Koukam, A., Pucci, M., Sabatucci, L., and Vitale, G., 2009, “Intelligent Energy Management System,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Cardiff, Wales, June 23–26, pp.232–237.
Basso, G., Hilaire, V., Lauri, F., Roche, R., and Cossentino, M., 2011, “A MAS-Based Simulator for the Prototyping of Smart Grids,” Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2011), Maastricht, Netherlands, pp.1–15.
Pipattanasomporn, M., Feroze, H., and Rahman, S., 2099, “Multi-Agent Systems in a Distributed Smart Grid: Design and Implementation,” Proceedings of the IEEE/PES on Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, Mar. 15–18, pp. 1–8.
Lagorse, J., Paire, D., and Miraoui, A., 2010, “A Multi-Agent System for Energy Management of Distributed Power Sources,” Renewable Energy, 35(1), pp. 174–182. [CrossRef]
Erickson, R. W., and Maksimovic, D., 2001, Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic, Secaucus, NJ.
Maiti, D., Acharya, A., Chakraborty, M., Konar, A., and Janarthanan, R., 2008, “Tuning PID and PI/λDδ Controllers Using the Integral Time Absolute Error Criterion,” Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability, ICIAFS 2008, Colombo, Sri Lanka, Dec. 12–14, pp. 457–462.
Brooks, R. A., 1986, “A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot,” IEEE J. Rob. Autom., 2(1), pp. 14–23. [CrossRef]
Toal, D., Flanagan, C., Jones, C., and Strunz, B., 1996, “Subsumption Architecture for the Control of Robots,” Proceedings of the 13th Irish Manufacturing Conference (IMC-13), Limerick, Ireland, pp.703–711.
Rosenblatt, J. K., and Payton, D. W., 1989, “A Fine-Grained Alternative to the Subsumption Architecture for Mobile Robot Control,” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, DC, Vol. 2, pp. 317–323.
Yufeng, M., and Qingxia, L., 2010, “A Mobile Public Information System Based on Subsumption Architecture,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Chengdu, China, July 9–11, Vol. 1, pp. 331–334.
Rustemli, S., and Dincer, F., 2011, “Modeling of Photovoltaic Panel and Examining Effects of Temperature in Matlab/Simulink,” Electron. Electr. Eng., 109(3), pp. 35–40. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Vertical layering. (a) One pass control and (b) two pass control.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Horizontal layering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Diagram of the surveyed electrical system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Control structure of the converters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Canonical model of DC to DC converter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Regulator system small-signal block diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Brooks's subsumption architecture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

System layering with subsumption architecture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The subsumption architecture for current sharing by the SC agent

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The subsumption architecture for current sharing by the PV agent

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The subsumption architecture for current sharing with the battery agent

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The overall structure of system control. Dashed lines show communicating channels among agents. Dotted lines show commends sent by agent to devises.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Simulated model of the system. The presented subsumption architecture in Fig. 8 has been implemented in EMS box.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Results of the management system (variations of voltage and current of agents are shown)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Contribution of gents in voltage controlling task

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Variations of the PV current during fault tolerance tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Variations of the battery current during fault tolerance tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Variations of the battery SOC during fault tolerance tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Variations of grid current during fault tolerance tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

DC bus voltage during fault tolerance tests



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In