Research Papers

Thermo-Economic Optimization of Solar CCHP Using Both Genetic and Particle Swarm Algorithms

[+] Author and Article Information
Sepehr Sanaye

Energy Systems Improvement Laboratory (ESIL),
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Iran University of Science
and Technology (IUST),
Narmak, Tehran 16844, Iran

Hassan Hajabdollahi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan,
Rafsanjan, Iran
e-mail: Hajabdollahi@iust.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 7, 2012; final manuscript received October 30, 2013; published online July 29, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Werner Platzer.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 137(1), 011001 (Jul 29, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: SOL-12-1221; doi: 10.1115/1.4027932 History: Received September 07, 2012; Revised October 30, 2013

A combined cooling, heating and power generation (CCHP) system is modeled and optimized. The heat demand in this plant can provide by prime mover, backup boiler, and solar panels. Both the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are used to find the maximum of actual annual benefit (AAB) as an objective function. The design parameters or decision variables are capacity of prime mover, their number as well as their partial load (PL), backup boiler and storage tank heating capacity, the number of solar panels, types of electrical and absorption chiller as well as the electric cooling ratio. Both genetic and PSO algorithms are converged with maximum 0.6% difference. As a result, a diesel engine with nominal power of 350 kW combined with 255 solar panels is selected in the optimum situation. In addition, the optimization results show that the advantage of absorption chiller than the electrical chiller due to the extra availability of heat by the prime mover at the warm season in residential area. Finally, the effect of electric cooling ratio, number of solar panels and solar panels investment cost on objective function are investigated and results are reported.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Fumo, N., Mago, P. J., and Chamra, L. M., 2009, “Emission Operational Strategy for Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power Systems,” Appl. Energy, 86(11), pp. 2344–2350. [CrossRef]
Abdollahi, Gh., and Meratizaman, M., 2011, “Multi-Objective Approach in Thermo Environomic Optimization of a Small-Scale Distributed CCHP System With Risk Analysis,” Energy Build., 43(11), pp. 3144–3153. [CrossRef]
Mago, P. J., and Chamra, L. M., 2009, “Analysis and Optimization of CCHP Systems Based on Energy, Economical, and Environmental Considerations,” Energy Build., 41(10), pp. 1099–1106. [CrossRef]
Ebrahimi, M., Keshavarz, A., and Jamali, A., 2012, “Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Micro-Steam CCHP Cycle for a Residential Building,” Energy Build., 45, pp. 202–210. [CrossRef]
Sanaye, S., Meybodi, M. A., and Shokrollahi, S., 2008, “Selecting the Prime Movers and Nominal Powers in Combined Heat and Power Systems,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 28(10), pp. 1177–1188. [CrossRef]
Sanaye, S., and Ardali, M. R., 2009, “Estimating the Power and Number of Micro Turbines in Small-Scale Combined Heat and Power Systems,” Appl. Energy, 86(6), pp. 895–903. [CrossRef]
Kong, X. Q., Wang, R. Z., Li, Y., and Huang, X. H., 2009, “Optimal Operation of a Micro-Combined Cooling, Heating and Power System Driven by a Gas Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 50(3), pp. 530–538. [CrossRef]
Jiang-Jiang, W., Chun-Fa, Z., and You-Yin, J., 2010, “Multi-Criteria Analysis of Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Systems in Different Climate Zones in China,” Appl. Energy, 87(4), pp. 1247–1259. [CrossRef]
Fumo, N., Mago, P. J., and Chamra, L. M., 2009, “Analysis of Cooling, Heating, and Power Systems Based on Site Energy Consumption,” Appl. Energy, 86(6), pp. 928–932. [CrossRef]
Fumo, N., and Chamra, L. M., 2010, “Analysis of Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power Systems Based on Source Primary Energy Consumption,” Appl. Energy, 87(6), pp. 2023–2030. [CrossRef]
Wang, J., Zhai, Z., Jing, Y., and Zhang, C., 2010, “Particle Swarm Optimization for Redundant Building Cooling Heating and Power System,” Appl. Energy, 87(12), pp. 3668–3679. [CrossRef]
Tichi, S. G., Ardehali, M. M., and Nazari, M. E., 2010, “Examination of Energy Price Policies in Iran for Optimal Configuration of CHP and CCHP Systems Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm,” Energy Policy, 38(10), pp. 6240–6250. [CrossRef]
Kalogirou, S. A., 2004, “Optimization of Solar Systems Using Artificial Neural-Networks and Genetic Algorithms,” Appl. Energy, 77(4), pp. 383–405. [CrossRef]
Sayyaadi, H., and Abdollahi, G., 2013, “Application of the Multi-Objective Optimization and Risk Analysis for the Sizing of a Residential Small-Scale CCHP System,” Energy Build., 60, pp. 330–344. [CrossRef]
Sanaye, S., and Nasab, A. M., 2012, “Modeling and Optimizing a CHP System for Natural Gas Pressure Reduction Plant,” Energy, 40(1), pp. 358–369. [CrossRef]
Tahani, M., Javan, S., and Biglari, M., 2013, “A Comprehensive Study on Waste Heat Recovery From Internal Combustion Engines Using Organic Rankine Cycle,” Therm. Sci, 17(2), pp. 611–624. [CrossRef]
Underwood, C. P., 2003, HVAC Control Systems: Modelling, Analysis and Design, Taylor & Francis.
Abdalla, F. K., and Wilson, P., 2001, “Assessment of Domestic Evacuated Tube Direct Solar Waterheater,” Proceedings of ISES Solar World Congress, Adelaide, Australia, Nov. 25–Dec. 2.
ASHRAE HANDBOOK, 1999, Cogeneration Systems and Engine and Turbine Drives, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, Chap. S7.
Li, H., Nalim, R., and Haldi, P. A., 2006, “Thermal-Economic Optimization of a Distributed Multi-Generation Energy System—A Case Study of Beijing,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 26(7), pp. 709–719. [CrossRef]
Boyce, M. P., 2002, Handbook for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants, ASME Press, New York.
Catalogue of CHP Technologies, 2008, US Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership, February.
Duffy, J., and Beckman, W., 1991, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, Wiley, New York.
Torres, A. M. D., and Rodríguez, L. G., 2010, “Analysis and Optimization of the Low-Temperature Solar Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC),” Energy Convers. Manage., 51(12), pp. 2846–2856. [CrossRef]
Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Holland, J. H., 1975, Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R., 1995, “Particle Swarm Optimization,” Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer, pp. 760–766.
“Web Site of Iranian Fuel Conservation Organization,” www.ifco.org


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a solar assisted combine cooling, heating, and power generation system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Hourly variation of ambient temperature during a year for studied case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Hourly demand of electricity, cooling and heating loads during a year for studied case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The cost of buying electricity and buying natural gas as a function of electricity and gas consumption

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Orientation of panel optimum angle and monthly average of received radiation during a year

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Hourly received radiation in the optimum angle during a year for studied case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Power and heat produced by diesel engine versus PL (points indicate the actual data and lines indicate the curve fitting)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The sum of energy in Fig. 7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Total demand electricity (electricity demand plus electrical chiller), buying electricity, electricity demand load and cogeneration generated electricity during a year in optimum case-for more clarity, the hourly results are replaced by average of results in each 15 days

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Heating load demand, heat generated by diesel engine, stored heat, heat generated by solar panels and boiler in optimum case; for more clarity, the hourly results are replaced by average of results in each 15 days

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Variation of AAB versus electric cooling ratio for optimum point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Variation of AAB versus the number of solar panels for optimum point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Percent of variation in optimum AAB in terms of percent of variation in solar panels investment cost for optimum point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Convergence of the objective function versus iterations using GA and PSO for six random runs




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In