0
Research Papers

Energy Efficient Two-Phase Microcooler Design for a Concentrated Photovoltaic Triple Junction Cell

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexander Reeser

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: reeser@umd.edu

Peng Wang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: wangp2007@gmail.com

Gad Hetsroni

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,
Technion City,
Haifa, Israel
e-mail: hetsroni@tx.technion.ac.il

Avram Bar-Cohen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: abc@umd.edu

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 8, 2013; final manuscript received April 3, 2014; published online May 2, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Santiago Silvestre.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 136(3), 031015 (May 02, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: SOL-13-1011; doi: 10.1115/1.4027422 History: Received January 08, 2013; Revised April 03, 2014

The potential application of an R134a-cooled two-phase microcooler for thermal management of a triple junction solar cell (CPV), under concentration of 2000 suns, is presented. An analytical model for the triple-junction solar cell temperature based on prediction of two-phase flow boiling in microchannel coolers is developed and exercised with empirical correlations from the open literature for the heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, and critical heat flux. The thermofluid analysis is augmented by detailed energy modeling relating the solar energy harvest to the “parasitic” work expended to provide the requisite cooling, including pumping power and the energy consumed in the formation and fabrication of the microcooler itself. Three fin thicknesses, between 100 μm and 500 μm, a variable number of fins, between 0 and 9, and 5 channel heights between 0.25 mm and 3 mm, are examined for a R134a flow rate of 0.85 g/s to determine the energy efficient microcooler design for a 10 mm × 10 mm triple junction CPV cell.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Pérez-Higueras, P., Mũnoz, E., Almonacid, G., and Vidal, P. G., 2011, “High Concentrator PhotoVoltaics Efficiencies: Present Status and Forecast,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 15, pp. 1810–1815. [CrossRef]
Radziemska, E., 2003, “Thermal Performance of Si and GaAs Based Solar Cells and Modules: A Review,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 29, pp. 407–424. [CrossRef]
Royne, A., Dey, C. J., and Mills, D. R., 2005, “Cooling of Photovoltaic Cells Under Concentrated Illumination: A Critical Review,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 86, pp. 451–483. [CrossRef]
Hana, X., Wang, Y., Zhu, L., Xiang, H., and Zhang, H., 2011, “Reliability Assessment of Silicone Coated Silicon Concentrator Solar Cells by Accelerated Aging Tests for Immersing in De-ionized Water,” Sol. Energy, 85, pp. 2781–2788. [CrossRef]
Cao, M., Butler, S., Benoit, J. T., Jiang, Y., Radhakrishnan, R., Chen, Y., and Bendapudi, S., 2008, “Horne Thermal Stress Analysis/Life Prediction of Concentrating Photovoltaic Module,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 130, pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Zhu, L., Boehm, R., Wang, Y., Halford, C., and Sun, Y., 2011, “Water Immersion Cooling of PV Cells in a High Concentration System,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 95, pp. 538–545. [CrossRef]
Han, X., Wang, Y., and Zhu, L., 2011, “Electrical and Thermal Performance of Silicon Concentrator Solar Cells Immersed in Dielectric Liquids,” Appl. Energy, 88, pp. 4481–4489. [CrossRef]
Royne, A., and Dey, C. J., 2007, “Design of a Jet Impingement Cooling Device for Densely Packed PV Cells Under High Concentration,” Sol. Energy, 81, pp. 1014–1024. [CrossRef]
Kessel, T. V., Abduljabar, A., Alyahya, A., Alyousef, B., Badahdah, A., Khonkar, H., Kirchner, P., Martin, Y., Manzer, D., Moumen, N., Prabhakar, A., Picunko, T., Sandstrom, R., Al-Saaedi, Y., Wacaser, B., and Guha, S., 2010, “Multi Receiver Concentrator Photovoltaic Testing at Extreme Concentrations,” Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2010, IEEE, New York, pp. 000498–000502.
Kessel, T. V., Abduljabar, A., Khonkar, H., Moumen, N., Sandstrom, R., Al-Saaedi, Y., Martin, Y., and Guha, S., 2009, “Concentrator Photovoltaic Reliability Testing at Extreme Concentrations up to 2000 Suns,” Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2009, New York, pp. 001020–001023.
Iyengar, M., and Bar-Cohen, A., 2003, “Least-Energy Optimization of Forced Convection Plate-Fin Heat Sinks,” IEEE, Components and Packaging Technologies, IEEE Transactions, 28(1), pp. 62–70. [CrossRef]
Copeland, D., 2000, “Optimization of Parallel Plate Heat Sinks for Forced Convection,” Proceedings of 16th IEEE SEMI-THERM Symp (SEMI-THERMAL 2000), San Jose, CA, 2000, IEEE, New York, pp. 266–272.
Gnielinski, V., 1976, “New Equations for Heat and Mass Transfer in Turbulent Pipe and Channel Flow,” Int. Chem. Eng., 16, pp. 359–368.
Kakac, S., 1987, “The Effect of Temperature Dependent Fluid Properties on Convective Heat Transfer,” Handbook of Single-Phase Convective Heat Transfer, Wiley, New York.
White, F., 2003, “Viscous Flow in Ducts” Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 350.
Mei, F., Parida, P. R., Meng, J. W., and Ekkad, S. V., 2008, “Fabrication, Assembly, and Testing of Cu-and Al-Based Microchannel Heat Exchangers,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 17, pp. 869–881. [CrossRef]
Chen, J., 1966, “Correlation for Boiling Heat Transfer to Saturated Fluids in Convective Flow,” I&EC Process Des. Dev., 5(3), pp. 322–329. [CrossRef]
Rahim, E., Revellin, R., Thome, J., and Bar-Cohen, A., 2011, “Characterization and Prediction of Two-Phase Flow Regimes in Miniature Tubes,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 37, pp. 12–23. [CrossRef]
Wang, P., McCluskey, F. P., and Bar-Cohen, A., 2011, “Evaluation of Two-Phase Cold Plate for Cooling Electric Vehicle Power Electronics,” 2011 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Volume 11: Nano and Micro Materials, Devices and Systems; Microsystems Integration:823–835. ASME Denver, CO, November 11–17, 2011, Paper No. IMECE2011-64330, pp. 823–835. [CrossRef]
Qu, W., and Mudawar, I., 2004, “Measurement and Correlation of Critical Heat Flux in Two-Phase Microchannel Heat Sinks,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, pp. 2045–2059. [CrossRef]
Muller-Steinhagen, H., and Heck, K., 1986, “A Simple Friction Pressure Drop Correlation for Two-Phase Flow in Pipes,” Chem. Eng. Process., 20, pp. 297–308. [CrossRef]
Zivi, S. M., 1964, “Estimation of Steady-State Steam Void-Fraction by Means of the Principle of Minimum Entropy Production,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 86, pp. 247–252. [CrossRef]
Olson, J. M., Friedman, D. J., and Kurtz, S., 2003, “High-Efficiency III-V Multijunction Solar Cells,” Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, Chap. 9.
Jones, R., 2011, private communication.
Reeser, A., 2013, “Energy Efficient Two-Phase Cooling for Concentrated Photovoltaic Arrays,” Master's thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Thermal resistance model: (a) solar cell; (b) thermal interface material; (c) microcooler; (d) adiabatic cover plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of CHF as a function of exit vapor quality

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Single-phase and two-phase effective heat transfer coefficient; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Single-phase and two-phase pressure drop; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Single-phase and two-phase pumping power; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Solar cell base temperature common to single-phase and two-phase cooling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Solar energy harvest for a R134a-cooled two-phase microcooler; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Single-phase and two-phase coefficient of performance; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Single-phase and two-phase total coefficient of performance (COPT); R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pumping work percentage versus number of channels; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of COPT, pumping power, and solar energy harvest at constant cell base temperature; R134a flow rate: 0.85 g/s

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In