Research Papers

Techniques to Measure Solar Flux Density Distribution on Large-Scale Receivers

[+] Author and Article Information
Marc Röger

German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Solar Research,
Plataforma Solar de Almería,
Tabernas 04200, Spain
e-mail: marc.roeger@dlr.de

Patrik Herrmann

Technical University of Darmstadt,
Reactive Flows and Diagnostics,
Darmstadt 64287, Germany

Steffen Ulmer, Miriam Ebert, Christoph Prahl

German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Solar Research,
Plataforma Solar de Almería,
Tabernas 04200, Spain

Felix Göhring

German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Solar Research,
Cologne 51147, Germany

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)

Flux And Temperature MEasurement System (FATMES)

Scanning Camera and Target Measurment System (SCATMES)

French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 1, 2012; final manuscript received March 7, 2014; published online May 2, 2014. Editor: Gilles Flamant.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 136(3), 031013 (May 02, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: SOL-12-1062; doi: 10.1115/1.4027261 History: Received March 01, 2012; Revised March 07, 2014

Flux density measurement applied to central receiver systems delivers the spatial distribution of the concentrated solar radiation on the receiver aperture, measures receiver input power, and monitors and might control heliostat aimpoints. Commercial solar tower plants have much larger aperture surfaces than the receiver prototypes tested in earlier research and development (R&D) projects. Existing methods to measure the solar flux density in the receiver aperture face new challenges regarding the receiver size. Also, the requirements regarding costs, accuracy, spatial resolution, and measuring speed are different. This paper summarizes existent concepts, presents recent research results for techniques that can be applied to large-scale receivers and assesses them against a catalog of requirements. Direct and indirect moving bar techniques offer high measurement accuracy, but also have the disadvantage of large moving parts on a solar tower. In the case of external receivers, measuring directly on receiver surfaces avoids moving parts and allows continuous measurement but may be not as precise. This promising technique requires proper scientific evaluation due to specific reflectance properties of current receiver materials. Measurement-supported simulation techniques can also be applied to cavity receivers without installing moving parts. They have reasonable uncertainties under ideal conditions and require comparatively low effort.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Thalhammer, E., 1979, “Heliostat Beam Characterization System—Update,” I.S.A. Reprint 79-692, ISA-79 National Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, Illinois.
von Tobel, G., Schelders, Ch., and Real, M., 1982, “Concentrated Solar Flux Measurements at the IEA-SSPS Solar Central Receiver Power Plant,” Tabernas—Almería, Spain, Final Report, Swiss.
Schiel, W., 1985, “500 kW-Solarturmkraftwerk—Teil I: Mess-Grössen und Messsystem,” Brennstoff-Wärme-Kraft (BWK) 6/85, S. 266–268.
Neumann, A., and Monterreal, R., 1992, “Measurement of Concentrated Solar Radiation With the HERMES II System at the PSA,” 6th International Symposium on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, Mojacar, Spain, Sept. 28–Oct. 2.
Lüpfert, E., Heller, P., Ulmer, S., Monterreal, R., and Fernández, J., 2000, “Concentrated Solar Radiation Measurement With Video Image Processing and Online Fluxgage Calibration,” Solar Thermal 2000 International Conference, Sydney, Australia, Mar. 8–10.
Imenes, A., Stein, W., Hinkley, J., Benito, R., Bolling, R., Schramek, P., and Ulmer, S., 2006, “Ray Tracing and Flux Mapping as a Design and Research Tool at the National Solar Energy Centre,” ANZSES 2006 Conference (Australia and New Zealand Solar Energy Society), Canberra, Australia, Sept. 13–15, Paper No. S06-81.
Neumann, A., and Groer, U., 1996, “Experimenting With Concentrated Sunlight Using the DLR Solar Furnace,” Solar Energy, 58, pp. 181–190. [CrossRef]
Kröger, K., Kaluza, J., and Neumann, A., 2000, “First Application of the Flux Mapping System SCATMES for Secondary Concentrator Performance Analysis,” Solar Thermal 2000 International Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Giral, J., Boulet, N., and Hernandez, G., 2000, “OBELIX: Flux Mapping System Using a Video Camera,” Proceedings of the 14th Task III Meeting Within IEA SolarPACES on Solar Technology and Applications, Sydney, Australia SolarPACES Technical Report No. III-2/00.
Johnston, G., 1994, “Focal Region Characterizations of Paraboloidal Dishes at the Australian National University,” Proceedings of Seventh International Symposium on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, Moscow, Sept. 26–30.
Ulmer, S., Reinalter, W., Heller, P., Lüpfert, E., and Martinez, D., 2002, “Beam Characterization and Improvement With a Flux Mapping System for Dish Concentrators,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 182–188. [CrossRef]
Ulmer, S., 2004, “Messung der Strahlungsflussdichte-Verteilung Von Punktkonzentrierenden Solarthermischen Kraftwerken,” Ph.D. dissertation, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf.
Ulmer, S., Lüpfert, E., Pfänder, M., and Buck, R., 2004, “Calibration Corrections of Solar Tower Flux Density Measurements,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 925–933. [CrossRef]
Strachan, J. W., and Houser, R. M., 1993, “Testing and Evaluation of Large-Area Heliostats for Solar Thermal Applications,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, SAND92-1381, UC-235.
Ho, C., and Khalsa, S., 2012, “A Photographic Flux Mapping Method for Concentrating Solar Collectors and Receivers,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 134(4), p. 041004. [CrossRef]
Pacheco, J., Houser, R., and Neumann, A., 1994, “Concepts to Measure Flux and Temperature for External Central Receivers,” Joint Solar Engineering Conference, ASME, pp. 595–603.
Ballestrín, J., and Monterreal, R., 2004, “Hybrid Heat Flux Measurement System for Solar Central Receiver Evaluation,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 915–924. [CrossRef]
Yogev, O., Gleckman, P., and Rozler, M., 2009, “High-Heat Solar Flux Scanner,” Proceedings of SolarPACES 2009, Berlin, Germany, Sept. 15–18.
Elsayed, M. M., Fathalah, K. A., and Al-Rabghi, O. M., 1995, “Measurements of Solar Flux Density Distribution on a Plane Receiver due to a Flat Heliostat,” Sol. Energy, 54(6), pp. 403–411. [CrossRef]
Osuna, R., Morillo, R., Jiménez, J. M., and Fernández-Quero, V., 2006, “Control and Operation Strategies in PS10 Solar Plant,” Proceedings 13th Solar PACES, Sevilla, Spain, Jun. 20–23.
Lewandowski, A., Bingham, C., Rouzine, M., and Rouzine, A., 2000, “Testing of a Wire Analyzer for Flux Distribution,” Solar Thermal 2000 International Conference, Sydney, Australia, Mar. 8–10.
Kaluza, J., and Neumann, A., 2001, Comparative Measurements of Different Solar Flux Gauge Types,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 123(3), pp. 251–255. [CrossRef]
Ballestrín, J., Estrada, C. A., Rodríguez-Alonso, M., Pérez-Rábago, C., Langley, L. W., and Barnes, A., 2006, “Heat Flux Sensors: Calorimeters or Radiometers?,” Sol. Energy, 80, pp. 1314–1320. [CrossRef]
Göhring, F., Bender, O., Röger, M., Nettlau, J., and Schwarzbözl, P., 2011, “Flux Density Measurement on Open Volumetric Receivers,” Proceedings of SolarPACES 2011, Granada, Spain, Sept. 20–23.
Belhomme, B., Pitz-Paal, R., Schwarzbözl, P., and Ulmer, S., 2009, “New Fast Ray Tracing Tool for High-Precision Simulation of Heliostat Fields,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 131(3), p. 031002. [CrossRef]
Amsbeck, L., Denk, T., Ebert, M., Gertig, C., Heller, P., Herrmann, P., Jedamski, J., John, J., Pitz-Paal, R., Prosineĉki, T., Rehn, J., Reinalter, W., and Uhlig, R., 2010, “Test of a Solar-Hybrid Microturbine System and Evaluation of Storage Deployment,” Proceedings of SolarPACES 2010, Perpignan, France, Sept. 21–24.
Ulmer, S., März, T., Prahl, C., Reinalter, W., and Belhomme, B., 2011, “Automated High Resolution Measurement of Heliostat Slope Errors,” Sol. Energy, 85, pp. 681–687. [CrossRef]
Neumann, A., Witzke, A., Jones, S., and Schmitt, G., 2002, “Representative Terrestrial Solar Brightness profiles,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 198–204. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Possible mechanisms of linear moving bars (left: horizontal bar and right: vertical bar)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Grabbed CCD image (a1), deskewed and unwinded gray value image in false colors (a2), and image after application of brightness correction matrix and calibration (a3). Image (b) shows the moving bar measurement as reference (open volumetric receiver PSA, ∼225 kW, 13.12.07, 13:20 h).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Normalized BRDF values of a volumetric ceramic receiver as a function of zenith and azimuth angle. Comparison of laboratory gonioreflectometer measurements (sketch left and half markers) and measurements with heliostat groups of solar field (full markers, also see Fig. 4).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized BRDF value for each heliostat of the CESA-1 heliostat field at PSA, assuming a plane volumetric air receiver at 84 m height, 30 deg inclined, and camera position at the rear of the field

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Procedure of scanning part of the focus over a stripe-shaped, fixed target

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flux density distributions on radiation shield plane in kW/m2 during test 1 (PSA, 19.05.10, 12:50 h, 46 heliostats). Ray tracing simulation (a1). Measurement directly on radiation shield after application of correction matrix and calibration (a2).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Moving bar reference measurement shifted to radiation shield plane for test 1, PSA, 19.05.10, 12:50 h

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Requirements to reach the design specifications. The fields marked in gray show the different measurement objectives.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In